{"title":"股票市场对碳排放政策有何反应?2014-2022年的中国经验","authors":"Sarula Bai, Cheol-Won Yang","doi":"10.1002/app5.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As countries around the world move towards carbon neutrality, firms are facing new challenges of policy uncertainty. China is an interesting place to explore this, as it is the largest carbon emitter and is taking strong steps towards carbon neutrality after the Paris Agreement. We investigate the impact of 28 Chinese carbon neutral policies on the stock return and systematic risk during 2014–2022. Event study methodology and modified CAPM (capital asset pricing model) with dummy variable for announcement date are employed. The results show that the electricity & heating, finance, and health sector experiences negative effects, while the mining industry has positive returns. Industries with mixed impacts initially experience negative impacts in the early stages, but turn positive later. Moreover, there is a noticeable trend of decreasing systematic risk in high-energy-consuming industries. This suggests that consistent policy enforcement can reduce the risks stemming from policy uncertainty, which in turn can benefit both firms and investors.</p>","PeriodicalId":45839,"journal":{"name":"Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/app5.70032","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Does the Stock Market React to the Carbon Policy? The Chinese Experience During 2014–2022\",\"authors\":\"Sarula Bai, Cheol-Won Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/app5.70032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>As countries around the world move towards carbon neutrality, firms are facing new challenges of policy uncertainty. China is an interesting place to explore this, as it is the largest carbon emitter and is taking strong steps towards carbon neutrality after the Paris Agreement. We investigate the impact of 28 Chinese carbon neutral policies on the stock return and systematic risk during 2014–2022. Event study methodology and modified CAPM (capital asset pricing model) with dummy variable for announcement date are employed. The results show that the electricity & heating, finance, and health sector experiences negative effects, while the mining industry has positive returns. Industries with mixed impacts initially experience negative impacts in the early stages, but turn positive later. Moreover, there is a noticeable trend of decreasing systematic risk in high-energy-consuming industries. This suggests that consistent policy enforcement can reduce the risks stemming from policy uncertainty, which in turn can benefit both firms and investors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/app5.70032\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/app5.70032\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/app5.70032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
How Does the Stock Market React to the Carbon Policy? The Chinese Experience During 2014–2022
As countries around the world move towards carbon neutrality, firms are facing new challenges of policy uncertainty. China is an interesting place to explore this, as it is the largest carbon emitter and is taking strong steps towards carbon neutrality after the Paris Agreement. We investigate the impact of 28 Chinese carbon neutral policies on the stock return and systematic risk during 2014–2022. Event study methodology and modified CAPM (capital asset pricing model) with dummy variable for announcement date are employed. The results show that the electricity & heating, finance, and health sector experiences negative effects, while the mining industry has positive returns. Industries with mixed impacts initially experience negative impacts in the early stages, but turn positive later. Moreover, there is a noticeable trend of decreasing systematic risk in high-energy-consuming industries. This suggests that consistent policy enforcement can reduce the risks stemming from policy uncertainty, which in turn can benefit both firms and investors.
期刊介绍:
Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies is the flagship journal of the Crawford School of Public Policy at The Australian National University. It is a peer-reviewed journal that targets research in policy studies in Australia, Asia and the Pacific, across a discipline focus that includes economics, political science, governance, development and the environment. Specific themes of recent interest include health and education, aid, migration, inequality, poverty reduction, energy, climate and the environment, food policy, public administration, the role of the private sector in public policy, trade, foreign policy, natural resource management and development policy. Papers on a range of topics that speak to various disciplines, the region and policy makers are encouraged. The goal of the journal is to break down barriers across disciplines, and generate policy impact. Submissions will be reviewed on the basis of content, policy relevance and readability.