向可持续经济过渡:一个初步的去增长宏观经济模型

IF 6.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Eric Kemp-Benedict
{"title":"向可持续经济过渡:一个初步的去增长宏观经济模型","authors":"Eric Kemp-Benedict","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The degrowth literature argues that growth in real monetary terms is unsustainable and rejects appeals to decoupling. But it assumes the continued availability of advanced materials and technology. This paper argues that much of the degrowth literature implicitly or explicitly requires an industrial “core.” The paper introduces a stylized three-sector model with a formal convivial economy that predominates in everyday life, together with an industrial core and informal household convivial production. Drawing on prior work by post-Keynesian economists, which showed that positive net profit for the economy as a whole is compatible with a steady-state economy if there is consumption out of wealth, this paper shows that a wealth tax can play the same role and extends the result to a degrowth pathway. This has important policy implications because the viability of degrowth and a steady state no longer rely on a behavioral parameter alone, opening the way for functional finance. The paper presents an explicit balanced degrowth pathway, and then discusses more realistic degrowth pathways.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 108700"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transitioning to a sustainable economy: A preliminary degrowth macroeconomic model\",\"authors\":\"Eric Kemp-Benedict\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The degrowth literature argues that growth in real monetary terms is unsustainable and rejects appeals to decoupling. But it assumes the continued availability of advanced materials and technology. This paper argues that much of the degrowth literature implicitly or explicitly requires an industrial “core.” The paper introduces a stylized three-sector model with a formal convivial economy that predominates in everyday life, together with an industrial core and informal household convivial production. Drawing on prior work by post-Keynesian economists, which showed that positive net profit for the economy as a whole is compatible with a steady-state economy if there is consumption out of wealth, this paper shows that a wealth tax can play the same role and extends the result to a degrowth pathway. This has important policy implications because the viability of degrowth and a steady state no longer rely on a behavioral parameter alone, opening the way for functional finance. The paper presents an explicit balanced degrowth pathway, and then discusses more realistic degrowth pathways.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"volume\":\"237 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108700\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925001831\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925001831","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

反增长的文献认为,以实际货币计算的增长是不可持续的,并拒绝接受脱钩论。但前提是先进材料和技术的持续可用性。本文认为,许多去增长的文献或隐或明地要求一个工业“核心”。本文介绍了一个程式化的三部门模型,其中正式的娱乐经济在日常生活中占主导地位,以及工业核心和非正式的家庭娱乐生产。后凯恩斯主义经济学家先前的研究表明,如果存在财富消费,那么整个经济的正净利润与稳态经济是相容的。本文借鉴了这些研究,表明财富税可以发挥同样的作用,并将结果扩展到去增长途径。这具有重要的政策意义,因为去增长和稳定状态的可行性不再仅仅依赖于行为参数,为功能性金融开辟了道路。本文提出了一个明确的平衡的去生长路径,然后讨论了更现实的去生长路径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transitioning to a sustainable economy: A preliminary degrowth macroeconomic model
The degrowth literature argues that growth in real monetary terms is unsustainable and rejects appeals to decoupling. But it assumes the continued availability of advanced materials and technology. This paper argues that much of the degrowth literature implicitly or explicitly requires an industrial “core.” The paper introduces a stylized three-sector model with a formal convivial economy that predominates in everyday life, together with an industrial core and informal household convivial production. Drawing on prior work by post-Keynesian economists, which showed that positive net profit for the economy as a whole is compatible with a steady-state economy if there is consumption out of wealth, this paper shows that a wealth tax can play the same role and extends the result to a degrowth pathway. This has important policy implications because the viability of degrowth and a steady state no longer rely on a behavioral parameter alone, opening the way for functional finance. The paper presents an explicit balanced degrowth pathway, and then discusses more realistic degrowth pathways.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信