虚弱和谵妄:老年人的致命组合

Jay Acharya , Radcliffe Lisk , Rashid Mahmood , Amir Manzoor , Francesca Young , Mitveer Gill , Keefai Yeong , Kevin Kelly , Jonathan Robin , David Fluck , Christopher Henry Fry , Thang Sieu Han
{"title":"虚弱和谵妄:老年人的致命组合","authors":"Jay Acharya ,&nbsp;Radcliffe Lisk ,&nbsp;Rashid Mahmood ,&nbsp;Amir Manzoor ,&nbsp;Francesca Young ,&nbsp;Mitveer Gill ,&nbsp;Keefai Yeong ,&nbsp;Kevin Kelly ,&nbsp;Jonathan Robin ,&nbsp;David Fluck ,&nbsp;Christopher Henry Fry ,&nbsp;Thang Sieu Han","doi":"10.1016/j.aggp.2025.100180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Frailty and delirium commonly coexist in acutely ill older adults, but they are variably measured. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and the 4AT scores are advocated as standardised tools to assess these conditions. We have developed risk categories based on these scales to predict mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two-graph ROC curve analysis derived thresholds at 5.5 for CFS and 1 for 4AT for predicting mortality, from which three composite <em>Risk-Categories</em> were created: “<em>Low-Risk</em>” represents low scores for both CFS (1–6) and 4AT (0); <em>Intermediate-Risk”</em> represents either high CFS (7–9) or high 4AT (1–12) scores; and <em>High-Risk</em>” represents both high CFS and 4AT scales. These <em>Risk-Categories</em> were used to predict in-hospital or 30-day mortality using logistic regression, and up to 27 months since admission using Cox regression; adjusted for age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, anticholinergic burden and polypharmacy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 1192 patients (57.1 % women) of mean age 86.1 yr (SD=7.1) consecutively admitted to a hospital. Compared to those in the “<em>Low-Risk</em>” category (reference), in-hospital mortality odds-ratios (ORs; 95 %CI) were greater for those in the “<em>Intermediate-Risk”</em> category: OR=1.74 (1.11–2.72), and “<em>High-Risk</em>” category: OR=2.72 (1.47–5.02). Corresponding values for within 30-day mortality were: OR=1.75 (1.18–2.60) and OR=3.03 (1.76–5.21). Risk of death within 27 months of admission was increased in the “<em>High-Risk</em>” category: hazard ratio=1.46 (1.14–1.87). The association of CFS and mortality was partially mediated by 4AT.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Mortality in hospital was approximately doubled in “<em>Intermediate-Risk</em>” and tripled in “<em>High-Risk</em>” patients, which persisted after discharge. These risk categories are a useful tool for identifying high-risk patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100119,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frailty and delirium: A fatal combination in older adults\",\"authors\":\"Jay Acharya ,&nbsp;Radcliffe Lisk ,&nbsp;Rashid Mahmood ,&nbsp;Amir Manzoor ,&nbsp;Francesca Young ,&nbsp;Mitveer Gill ,&nbsp;Keefai Yeong ,&nbsp;Kevin Kelly ,&nbsp;Jonathan Robin ,&nbsp;David Fluck ,&nbsp;Christopher Henry Fry ,&nbsp;Thang Sieu Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aggp.2025.100180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Frailty and delirium commonly coexist in acutely ill older adults, but they are variably measured. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and the 4AT scores are advocated as standardised tools to assess these conditions. We have developed risk categories based on these scales to predict mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two-graph ROC curve analysis derived thresholds at 5.5 for CFS and 1 for 4AT for predicting mortality, from which three composite <em>Risk-Categories</em> were created: “<em>Low-Risk</em>” represents low scores for both CFS (1–6) and 4AT (0); <em>Intermediate-Risk”</em> represents either high CFS (7–9) or high 4AT (1–12) scores; and <em>High-Risk</em>” represents both high CFS and 4AT scales. These <em>Risk-Categories</em> were used to predict in-hospital or 30-day mortality using logistic regression, and up to 27 months since admission using Cox regression; adjusted for age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, anticholinergic burden and polypharmacy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 1192 patients (57.1 % women) of mean age 86.1 yr (SD=7.1) consecutively admitted to a hospital. Compared to those in the “<em>Low-Risk</em>” category (reference), in-hospital mortality odds-ratios (ORs; 95 %CI) were greater for those in the “<em>Intermediate-Risk”</em> category: OR=1.74 (1.11–2.72), and “<em>High-Risk</em>” category: OR=2.72 (1.47–5.02). Corresponding values for within 30-day mortality were: OR=1.75 (1.18–2.60) and OR=3.03 (1.76–5.21). Risk of death within 27 months of admission was increased in the “<em>High-Risk</em>” category: hazard ratio=1.46 (1.14–1.87). The association of CFS and mortality was partially mediated by 4AT.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Mortality in hospital was approximately doubled in “<em>Intermediate-Risk</em>” and tripled in “<em>High-Risk</em>” patients, which persisted after discharge. These risk categories are a useful tool for identifying high-risk patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950307825000621\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950307825000621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虚弱和谵妄通常共存于老年急性病患者,但其测量结果各不相同。临床虚弱量表(CFS)和4AT评分被提倡作为评估这些状况的标准化工具。我们根据这些量表制定了风险分类来预测死亡率。方法双图ROC曲线分析得出预测死亡率的阈值CFS为5.5,4AT为1,由此创建了三个综合风险类别:“低风险”表示CFS(1 - 6)和4AT(0)得分均较低;“中度风险”代表高CFS(7-9)或高4AT(1-12)评分;和高风险”代表高CFS和4AT量表。这些风险分类使用逻辑回归预测住院或30天死亡率,使用Cox回归预测入院后27个月死亡率;调整了年龄、性别、Charlson合并症指数、抗胆碱能负担和多种药物。结果连续住院1192例,女性占57.1%,平均年龄86.1岁(SD=7.1)。与“低风险”类别(参考)的患者相比,住院死亡率比值(ORs;95% CI)在“中度风险”类别中更大:OR=1.74(1.11-2.72),“高风险”类别:OR=2.72(1.47-5.02)。相应的30天内死亡率值分别为OR=1.75(1.18 ~ 2.60)和OR=3.03(1.76 ~ 5.21)。入院后27个月内的“高风险”类别死亡风险增加:风险比=1.46(1.14-1.87)。CFS与死亡率的关联部分由4AT介导。结论“中危”患者住院死亡率约为2倍,“高危”患者住院死亡率约为3倍,出院后仍持续存在。这些风险分类是识别高危患者的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frailty and delirium: A fatal combination in older adults

Background

Frailty and delirium commonly coexist in acutely ill older adults, but they are variably measured. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and the 4AT scores are advocated as standardised tools to assess these conditions. We have developed risk categories based on these scales to predict mortality.

Methods

Two-graph ROC curve analysis derived thresholds at 5.5 for CFS and 1 for 4AT for predicting mortality, from which three composite Risk-Categories were created: “Low-Risk” represents low scores for both CFS (1–6) and 4AT (0); Intermediate-Risk” represents either high CFS (7–9) or high 4AT (1–12) scores; and High-Risk” represents both high CFS and 4AT scales. These Risk-Categories were used to predict in-hospital or 30-day mortality using logistic regression, and up to 27 months since admission using Cox regression; adjusted for age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, anticholinergic burden and polypharmacy.

Results

There were 1192 patients (57.1 % women) of mean age 86.1 yr (SD=7.1) consecutively admitted to a hospital. Compared to those in the “Low-Risk” category (reference), in-hospital mortality odds-ratios (ORs; 95 %CI) were greater for those in the “Intermediate-Risk” category: OR=1.74 (1.11–2.72), and “High-Risk” category: OR=2.72 (1.47–5.02). Corresponding values for within 30-day mortality were: OR=1.75 (1.18–2.60) and OR=3.03 (1.76–5.21). Risk of death within 27 months of admission was increased in the “High-Risk” category: hazard ratio=1.46 (1.14–1.87). The association of CFS and mortality was partially mediated by 4AT.

Conclusion

Mortality in hospital was approximately doubled in “Intermediate-Risk” and tripled in “High-Risk” patients, which persisted after discharge. These risk categories are a useful tool for identifying high-risk patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信