{"title":"以气道炎症测量和生物成像为指导的重症哮喘综合管理策略的临床缓解。","authors":"Santi Nolasco,Melanie Kjarsgaard,Sylvia Lauks,Owen Treleaven,Terence Ho,Chynna Huang,Katherine Radford,Taylor Swindall,Carmen Venegas Garrido,Anurag Bhalla,Sarita Thawanaphong,Yonni Friedlander,Lindsey Dyment,Michael Surette,Michael Trus,Roma Sehmi,Ehsan Haider,Nader Khalidi,Doron D Sommer,Susan Waserman,Manali Mukherjee,Sarah Svenningsen,Gerard Cox,Parameswaran Nair","doi":"10.1164/rccm.202412-2438oc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale: Clinical remission is a multicomponent treatment goal in severe asthma. However, only about 30% of patients achieve clinical remission when treatment decisions are guided using blood eosinophil and FeNO levels. Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of a comprehensive, individualized treatment strategy in achieving clinical remission over 24 months in patients with severe asthma. Methods: Treatment strategies-including anti-inflammatory therapies, biologics, antibiotics, immunomodulators, and bronchial thermoplasty-were guided by clinical assessment, airway physiology, airway inflammometry, and bioimaging. Clinical remission was defined as no exacerbations for 24 months, no oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, and partly/well-controlled symptoms, with or without lung function criteria. Measurements and Main Results: One-hundred seventy-eight patients with severe asthma were evaluated. Of these, 88.2% were treated with biologics alone or in combination with other strategies; 20.2% were treated with antibiotics, hypertonic saline, and/or immunoglobulins; and 9% underwent bronchial thermoplasty after controlling the inflammatory component. After 24 months, 89.9% of patients were exacerbation-free, 83.1% were OCS-free, 78.1% had partly/well-controlled symptoms, and 84.8% had preserved lung function. Clinical remission was achieved in 66.3% of patients based on the three primary criteria and in 61.6% when including FEV1% decline ≤5% from baseline. However, when the most stringent criteria were applied (ACQ-5 ≤0.75 and FEV1 ≥80%), the clinical remission rate was 29.1%. Residual disease activity was driven primarily by airway infections and airway hyperresponsiveness rather than T2 inflammation. Conclusions: By using a comprehensive set of biomarkers and employing a management strategy tailored to individual pathobiology, a high proportion of patients with severe asthma can achieve clinical remission, depending on the definitions used. Nonetheless, recurrent airway infections, mucus, and airway hyperresponsiveness remain key unmet needs in severe asthma.","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Remission by a Comprehensive Severe Asthma Management Strategy Guided by Airway Inflammometry and Bioimaging.\",\"authors\":\"Santi Nolasco,Melanie Kjarsgaard,Sylvia Lauks,Owen Treleaven,Terence Ho,Chynna Huang,Katherine Radford,Taylor Swindall,Carmen Venegas Garrido,Anurag Bhalla,Sarita Thawanaphong,Yonni Friedlander,Lindsey Dyment,Michael Surette,Michael Trus,Roma Sehmi,Ehsan Haider,Nader Khalidi,Doron D Sommer,Susan Waserman,Manali Mukherjee,Sarah Svenningsen,Gerard Cox,Parameswaran Nair\",\"doi\":\"10.1164/rccm.202412-2438oc\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rationale: Clinical remission is a multicomponent treatment goal in severe asthma. However, only about 30% of patients achieve clinical remission when treatment decisions are guided using blood eosinophil and FeNO levels. Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of a comprehensive, individualized treatment strategy in achieving clinical remission over 24 months in patients with severe asthma. Methods: Treatment strategies-including anti-inflammatory therapies, biologics, antibiotics, immunomodulators, and bronchial thermoplasty-were guided by clinical assessment, airway physiology, airway inflammometry, and bioimaging. Clinical remission was defined as no exacerbations for 24 months, no oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, and partly/well-controlled symptoms, with or without lung function criteria. Measurements and Main Results: One-hundred seventy-eight patients with severe asthma were evaluated. Of these, 88.2% were treated with biologics alone or in combination with other strategies; 20.2% were treated with antibiotics, hypertonic saline, and/or immunoglobulins; and 9% underwent bronchial thermoplasty after controlling the inflammatory component. After 24 months, 89.9% of patients were exacerbation-free, 83.1% were OCS-free, 78.1% had partly/well-controlled symptoms, and 84.8% had preserved lung function. Clinical remission was achieved in 66.3% of patients based on the three primary criteria and in 61.6% when including FEV1% decline ≤5% from baseline. However, when the most stringent criteria were applied (ACQ-5 ≤0.75 and FEV1 ≥80%), the clinical remission rate was 29.1%. Residual disease activity was driven primarily by airway infections and airway hyperresponsiveness rather than T2 inflammation. Conclusions: By using a comprehensive set of biomarkers and employing a management strategy tailored to individual pathobiology, a high proportion of patients with severe asthma can achieve clinical remission, depending on the definitions used. Nonetheless, recurrent airway infections, mucus, and airway hyperresponsiveness remain key unmet needs in severe asthma.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202412-2438oc\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202412-2438oc","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical Remission by a Comprehensive Severe Asthma Management Strategy Guided by Airway Inflammometry and Bioimaging.
Rationale: Clinical remission is a multicomponent treatment goal in severe asthma. However, only about 30% of patients achieve clinical remission when treatment decisions are guided using blood eosinophil and FeNO levels. Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of a comprehensive, individualized treatment strategy in achieving clinical remission over 24 months in patients with severe asthma. Methods: Treatment strategies-including anti-inflammatory therapies, biologics, antibiotics, immunomodulators, and bronchial thermoplasty-were guided by clinical assessment, airway physiology, airway inflammometry, and bioimaging. Clinical remission was defined as no exacerbations for 24 months, no oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, and partly/well-controlled symptoms, with or without lung function criteria. Measurements and Main Results: One-hundred seventy-eight patients with severe asthma were evaluated. Of these, 88.2% were treated with biologics alone or in combination with other strategies; 20.2% were treated with antibiotics, hypertonic saline, and/or immunoglobulins; and 9% underwent bronchial thermoplasty after controlling the inflammatory component. After 24 months, 89.9% of patients were exacerbation-free, 83.1% were OCS-free, 78.1% had partly/well-controlled symptoms, and 84.8% had preserved lung function. Clinical remission was achieved in 66.3% of patients based on the three primary criteria and in 61.6% when including FEV1% decline ≤5% from baseline. However, when the most stringent criteria were applied (ACQ-5 ≤0.75 and FEV1 ≥80%), the clinical remission rate was 29.1%. Residual disease activity was driven primarily by airway infections and airway hyperresponsiveness rather than T2 inflammation. Conclusions: By using a comprehensive set of biomarkers and employing a management strategy tailored to individual pathobiology, a high proportion of patients with severe asthma can achieve clinical remission, depending on the definitions used. Nonetheless, recurrent airway infections, mucus, and airway hyperresponsiveness remain key unmet needs in severe asthma.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences.
A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.