最新的有利组织学Wilms肿瘤风险分层:未来儿童肿瘤组临床试验的基本原理

IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Daniel J. Benedetti, Nicholas G. Cost, Peter F. Ehrlich, Nicholas Evageliou, Elizabeth Fialkowski, Lauren N. Parsons, Kelly L. Vallance, Lindsay A. Renfro, Andrew L. Hong, Jennifer H. Aldrink, Luke Pater, Arnold C. Paulino, Jesse K. Sandberg, Ethan A. Smith, Amy L. Treece, Jeffrey S. Dome, James I. Geller, Elizabeth A. Mullen
{"title":"最新的有利组织学Wilms肿瘤风险分层:未来儿童肿瘤组临床试验的基本原理","authors":"Daniel J. Benedetti, Nicholas G. Cost, Peter F. Ehrlich, Nicholas Evageliou, Elizabeth Fialkowski, Lauren N. Parsons, Kelly L. Vallance, Lindsay A. Renfro, Andrew L. Hong, Jennifer H. Aldrink, Luke Pater, Arnold C. Paulino, Jesse K. Sandberg, Ethan A. Smith, Amy L. Treece, Jeffrey S. Dome, James I. Geller, Elizabeth A. Mullen","doi":"10.1038/s41585-025-01055-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Patients with Wilms tumour have benefited from the results of decades of large collaborative clinical trials, leading to improved care. In the National Wilms Tumor Study Group and now Children’s Oncology Group (COG) trials, risk stratification evolved and expanded with each generation of studies and, therefore, ensuring that each patient receives the appropriate therapy has become increasingly complex. A new risk stratification system has been developed that forms the basis of the upcoming COG favourable-histology Wilms tumour (FHWT) study. Topics of diagnostic and prognostic uncertainty, such as the findings of tumour pulmonary emboli or extra-abdominal lymphadenopathy at diagnosis, will be integrated into the central review determination of staging of FHWT by committee consensus to facilitate clinical classification for therapeutic studies. Clear documentation of the elements of current risk stratification are of particular importance as refinement of the classification of patients with FHWT continues in an effort to optimize research, personalize treatment and provide an educational resource.</p>","PeriodicalId":19088,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Urology","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Updated favourable-histology Wilms tumour risk stratification: rationale for future Children’s Oncology Group clinical trials\",\"authors\":\"Daniel J. Benedetti, Nicholas G. Cost, Peter F. Ehrlich, Nicholas Evageliou, Elizabeth Fialkowski, Lauren N. Parsons, Kelly L. Vallance, Lindsay A. Renfro, Andrew L. Hong, Jennifer H. Aldrink, Luke Pater, Arnold C. Paulino, Jesse K. Sandberg, Ethan A. Smith, Amy L. Treece, Jeffrey S. Dome, James I. Geller, Elizabeth A. Mullen\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41585-025-01055-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Patients with Wilms tumour have benefited from the results of decades of large collaborative clinical trials, leading to improved care. In the National Wilms Tumor Study Group and now Children’s Oncology Group (COG) trials, risk stratification evolved and expanded with each generation of studies and, therefore, ensuring that each patient receives the appropriate therapy has become increasingly complex. A new risk stratification system has been developed that forms the basis of the upcoming COG favourable-histology Wilms tumour (FHWT) study. Topics of diagnostic and prognostic uncertainty, such as the findings of tumour pulmonary emboli or extra-abdominal lymphadenopathy at diagnosis, will be integrated into the central review determination of staging of FHWT by committee consensus to facilitate clinical classification for therapeutic studies. Clear documentation of the elements of current risk stratification are of particular importance as refinement of the classification of patients with FHWT continues in an effort to optimize research, personalize treatment and provide an educational resource.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Urology\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-025-01055-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-025-01055-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Wilms肿瘤患者受益于数十年大型合作临床试验的结果,从而改善了护理。在国家Wilms肿瘤研究小组和现在的儿童肿瘤小组(COG)的试验中,风险分层随着每一代研究的发展和扩展,因此,确保每个患者接受适当的治疗变得越来越复杂。一种新的风险分层系统已经被开发出来,形成了即将到来的COG有利组织学Wilms肿瘤(FHWT)研究的基础。诊断和预后不确定的主题,如诊断时发现的肿瘤肺栓塞或腹外淋巴结病,将通过委员会共识纳入FHWT分期的中心审查确定,以促进临床治疗研究的分类。随着FHWT患者分类的不断细化,以优化研究、个性化治疗和提供教育资源,明确当前风险分层要素的文件尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Updated favourable-histology Wilms tumour risk stratification: rationale for future Children’s Oncology Group clinical trials

Patients with Wilms tumour have benefited from the results of decades of large collaborative clinical trials, leading to improved care. In the National Wilms Tumor Study Group and now Children’s Oncology Group (COG) trials, risk stratification evolved and expanded with each generation of studies and, therefore, ensuring that each patient receives the appropriate therapy has become increasingly complex. A new risk stratification system has been developed that forms the basis of the upcoming COG favourable-histology Wilms tumour (FHWT) study. Topics of diagnostic and prognostic uncertainty, such as the findings of tumour pulmonary emboli or extra-abdominal lymphadenopathy at diagnosis, will be integrated into the central review determination of staging of FHWT by committee consensus to facilitate clinical classification for therapeutic studies. Clear documentation of the elements of current risk stratification are of particular importance as refinement of the classification of patients with FHWT continues in an effort to optimize research, personalize treatment and provide an educational resource.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Reviews Urology
Nature Reviews Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
123
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews Urology is part of the Nature Reviews portfolio of journals.Nature Reviews' basic, translational and clinical content is written by internationally renowned basic and clinical academics and researchers. This journal targeted readers in the biological and medical sciences, from the postgraduate level upwards, aiming to be accessible to professionals in any biological or medical discipline. The journal features authoritative In-depth Reviews providing up-to-date information on topics within a field's history and development. Perspectives, News & Views articles, and the Research Highlights section offer topical discussions and opinions, filtering primary research from various medical journals. Covering a wide range of subjects, including andrology, urologic oncology, and imaging, Nature Reviews provides valuable insights for practitioners, researchers, and academics within urology and related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信