经阴道超声与导管静脉造影鉴别盆腔静脉功能不全的准确性比较。

Daxina Bhatt, Shaneel Patel, David Riding, Katja Norse, Stephen Butterfield, Dare Seriki, Ganapathy Anantha-Krishnan, Jonathan Ghosh
{"title":"经阴道超声与导管静脉造影鉴别盆腔静脉功能不全的准确性比较。","authors":"Daxina Bhatt, Shaneel Patel, David Riding, Katja Norse, Stephen Butterfield, Dare Seriki, Ganapathy Anantha-Krishnan, Jonathan Ghosh","doi":"10.1177/02683555251353550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveChronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a debilitating condition affecting a quarter of premenopausal women and has been associated with pelvic vein incompetence (PVI). Catheter venography (CV) is the standard investigation, although transvaginal duplex (TVDU) ultrasound has emerged as a promising alternative. The accuracy of TVDU compared to CV is undefined and the optimal reflux time measured by TVDU to diagnose PVI is unknown. This study aimed to establish the diagnostic accuracy of TVDU in those with suspected PVI.MethodsThis cohort study included women enrolled into a randomised controlled trial comparing pelvic vein embolisation to no treatment, who underwent both TVDU and CV. Three consultant vascular interventional radiologists, blinded to TVDU results, independently reviewed catheter venograms. Reflux in bilateral ovarian and internal iliac veins was reported as a binary outcome. Pelvic reflux times, in both supine and semi-standing positions, were retrieved from TVDU reports. Diagnostic accuracy of TVDU was assessed using CV as the comparator. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were calculated.Results124 pelvic veins were analysed in 31 women. For a diagnostic reflux time threshold of 500 ms, TVDU had a sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 78% (AUI 0.71,95%CI 0.66-0.76). For a threshold of 700 ms, TVDU had a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 78% (AUI 0.76,95%CI 0.71-0.80). For a threshold of 700 ms, TVDU performed semi-standing had a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 78% (AUC of 0.78,95%CI 0.72-0.84) as compared to TVDU performed supine which had a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 78% (AUC 0.74,95%CI 0.67-0.80).ConclusionsTVDU demonstrates good diagnostic accuracy for PVI using a 700 ms reflux time threshold. Performing the test in a semi-standing position optimises accuracy. TVDU has potential as a diagnostic tool and may eliminate unnecessary invasive investigations, thus preserving catheter venography for intention to treat.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"2683555251353550"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of transvaginal duplex ultrasound compared to catheter venography for the identification of pelvic vein incompetence.\",\"authors\":\"Daxina Bhatt, Shaneel Patel, David Riding, Katja Norse, Stephen Butterfield, Dare Seriki, Ganapathy Anantha-Krishnan, Jonathan Ghosh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02683555251353550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveChronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a debilitating condition affecting a quarter of premenopausal women and has been associated with pelvic vein incompetence (PVI). Catheter venography (CV) is the standard investigation, although transvaginal duplex (TVDU) ultrasound has emerged as a promising alternative. The accuracy of TVDU compared to CV is undefined and the optimal reflux time measured by TVDU to diagnose PVI is unknown. This study aimed to establish the diagnostic accuracy of TVDU in those with suspected PVI.MethodsThis cohort study included women enrolled into a randomised controlled trial comparing pelvic vein embolisation to no treatment, who underwent both TVDU and CV. Three consultant vascular interventional radiologists, blinded to TVDU results, independently reviewed catheter venograms. Reflux in bilateral ovarian and internal iliac veins was reported as a binary outcome. Pelvic reflux times, in both supine and semi-standing positions, were retrieved from TVDU reports. Diagnostic accuracy of TVDU was assessed using CV as the comparator. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were calculated.Results124 pelvic veins were analysed in 31 women. For a diagnostic reflux time threshold of 500 ms, TVDU had a sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 78% (AUI 0.71,95%CI 0.66-0.76). For a threshold of 700 ms, TVDU had a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 78% (AUI 0.76,95%CI 0.71-0.80). For a threshold of 700 ms, TVDU performed semi-standing had a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 78% (AUC of 0.78,95%CI 0.72-0.84) as compared to TVDU performed supine which had a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 78% (AUC 0.74,95%CI 0.67-0.80).ConclusionsTVDU demonstrates good diagnostic accuracy for PVI using a 700 ms reflux time threshold. Performing the test in a semi-standing position optimises accuracy. TVDU has potential as a diagnostic tool and may eliminate unnecessary invasive investigations, thus preserving catheter venography for intention to treat.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phlebology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2683555251353550\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phlebology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251353550\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251353550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的慢性盆腔疼痛(CPP)是一种影响四分之一绝经前妇女的衰弱性疾病,与盆腔静脉功能不全(PVI)有关。导管静脉造影(CV)是标准的调查,尽管经阴道双超声(TVDU)已成为一种有前途的选择。与CV相比,TVDU的准确性尚不明确,TVDU测量的诊断PVI的最佳回流时间也未知。本研究旨在确定TVDU对疑似PVI患者的诊断准确性。方法:本队列研究纳入了一项随机对照试验,比较盆腔静脉栓塞与不治疗的妇女,她们接受了TVDU和CV治疗。三位顾问血管介入放射科医师,对TVDU结果不知情,独立审查导管静脉图。双侧卵巢和髂内静脉返流被报道为二元结果。从TVDU报告中检索仰卧位和半站立位的盆腔反流次数。以CV作为比较指标评估TVDU的诊断准确性。计算灵敏度、特异度和ROC曲线下面积(AUC)。结果对31例女性124条盆腔静脉进行了分析。对于500 ms的诊断反流时间阈值,TVDU的敏感性为64%,特异性为78% (AUI 0.71,95%CI 0.66-0.76)。当阈值为700 ms时,TVDU的灵敏度为74%,特异性为78% (AUI 0.76,95%CI 0.71-0.80)。对于700 ms的阈值,半站立时的TVDU的灵敏度为78%,特异性为78% (AUC为0.78,95%CI 0.72-0.84),而仰卧时的TVDU的灵敏度为70%,特异性为78% (AUC 0.74,95%CI 0.67-0.80)。结论stvdu在700 ms反流时间阈值下诊断PVI具有良好的准确性。在半站立状态下进行测试可以优化精度。TVDU具有作为诊断工具的潜力,可以消除不必要的侵入性检查,从而保留导管静脉造影的意向治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy of transvaginal duplex ultrasound compared to catheter venography for the identification of pelvic vein incompetence.

ObjectiveChronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a debilitating condition affecting a quarter of premenopausal women and has been associated with pelvic vein incompetence (PVI). Catheter venography (CV) is the standard investigation, although transvaginal duplex (TVDU) ultrasound has emerged as a promising alternative. The accuracy of TVDU compared to CV is undefined and the optimal reflux time measured by TVDU to diagnose PVI is unknown. This study aimed to establish the diagnostic accuracy of TVDU in those with suspected PVI.MethodsThis cohort study included women enrolled into a randomised controlled trial comparing pelvic vein embolisation to no treatment, who underwent both TVDU and CV. Three consultant vascular interventional radiologists, blinded to TVDU results, independently reviewed catheter venograms. Reflux in bilateral ovarian and internal iliac veins was reported as a binary outcome. Pelvic reflux times, in both supine and semi-standing positions, were retrieved from TVDU reports. Diagnostic accuracy of TVDU was assessed using CV as the comparator. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were calculated.Results124 pelvic veins were analysed in 31 women. For a diagnostic reflux time threshold of 500 ms, TVDU had a sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 78% (AUI 0.71,95%CI 0.66-0.76). For a threshold of 700 ms, TVDU had a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 78% (AUI 0.76,95%CI 0.71-0.80). For a threshold of 700 ms, TVDU performed semi-standing had a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 78% (AUC of 0.78,95%CI 0.72-0.84) as compared to TVDU performed supine which had a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 78% (AUC 0.74,95%CI 0.67-0.80).ConclusionsTVDU demonstrates good diagnostic accuracy for PVI using a 700 ms reflux time threshold. Performing the test in a semi-standing position optimises accuracy. TVDU has potential as a diagnostic tool and may eliminate unnecessary invasive investigations, thus preserving catheter venography for intention to treat.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信