Ahmed Ali Aziz, Muhammad Ali Aziz, Nosheen Omar, Rida Zahid, Muhammad Amir, Rehan Shah, Ijlal Akbar Ali
{"title":"急性胰腺炎住院结局的性别差异:回顾性分析","authors":"Ahmed Ali Aziz, Muhammad Ali Aziz, Nosheen Omar, Rida Zahid, Muhammad Amir, Rehan Shah, Ijlal Akbar Ali","doi":"10.7759/cureus.86371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common gastrointestinal condition that frequently necessitates hospitalization. The aim of our study is to investigate whether gender affects the outcomes of adult patients hospitalized with AP. Methods Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database 2020 and the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes, we performed a retrospective study of adult patients admitted with AP. We compared inpatient outcomes of AP between males and females. The primary outcome was all-cause inpatient mortality. Secondary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), total healthcare cost utilization, incidence of acute renal failure (ARF), sepsis, shock, and the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. We used STATA Version 16.1 to perform the statistical analyses. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess if gender was an independent predictor for these outcomes and to adjust for any confounders. Results A total of 252,595 adult patients were admitted for AP in 2020. The mean age was 50.89 years, and 139,180 (55.1 %) of the patients were males. Female patients had a higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease (9.26% vs 8.47%, P < 0.01), congestive heart failure (6.48% vs 5.69%, P < 0.01), and obesity (23.37% vs 17.39%, P < 0.01). Male patients had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus type 2 (27.32% vs 24.68%, P < 0.01), diabetes mellitus type 1 (1.32% vs 1.25%, P = 0.5), liver cirrhosis (1.81% vs 1.75%, P = 0.61), and smoking/tobacco use (39.38% vs 29.28%, P < 0.01). Females had significantly lower likelihood of in-hospital mortality (aOR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.51-0.82, P < 0.01), ARF (aOR 0.72, 95% CI: 0.68-0.76, P < 0.01), sepsis (aOR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.63-0.75, P < 0.01), and shock (aOR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.62-0.89, P < 0.01) than males. There was no statistically significant difference between LOS, total hospitalization charges, and ICU admission between the two genders. Conclusions We found that females had significantly improved clinical outcomes, including lower mortality, ARF, sepsis, and shock, as compared to males. There was no statistical difference between the two genders in LOS, total hospitalization charges, and ICU admission. Further prospective studies are needed to accurately understand these differences to guide clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 6","pages":"e86371"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender-Related Differences in Hospitalization Outcomes of Acute Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Ali Aziz, Muhammad Ali Aziz, Nosheen Omar, Rida Zahid, Muhammad Amir, Rehan Shah, Ijlal Akbar Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.7759/cureus.86371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common gastrointestinal condition that frequently necessitates hospitalization. The aim of our study is to investigate whether gender affects the outcomes of adult patients hospitalized with AP. Methods Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database 2020 and the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes, we performed a retrospective study of adult patients admitted with AP. We compared inpatient outcomes of AP between males and females. The primary outcome was all-cause inpatient mortality. Secondary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), total healthcare cost utilization, incidence of acute renal failure (ARF), sepsis, shock, and the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. We used STATA Version 16.1 to perform the statistical analyses. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess if gender was an independent predictor for these outcomes and to adjust for any confounders. Results A total of 252,595 adult patients were admitted for AP in 2020. The mean age was 50.89 years, and 139,180 (55.1 %) of the patients were males. Female patients had a higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease (9.26% vs 8.47%, P < 0.01), congestive heart failure (6.48% vs 5.69%, P < 0.01), and obesity (23.37% vs 17.39%, P < 0.01). Male patients had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus type 2 (27.32% vs 24.68%, P < 0.01), diabetes mellitus type 1 (1.32% vs 1.25%, P = 0.5), liver cirrhosis (1.81% vs 1.75%, P = 0.61), and smoking/tobacco use (39.38% vs 29.28%, P < 0.01). Females had significantly lower likelihood of in-hospital mortality (aOR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.51-0.82, P < 0.01), ARF (aOR 0.72, 95% CI: 0.68-0.76, P < 0.01), sepsis (aOR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.63-0.75, P < 0.01), and shock (aOR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.62-0.89, P < 0.01) than males. There was no statistically significant difference between LOS, total hospitalization charges, and ICU admission between the two genders. Conclusions We found that females had significantly improved clinical outcomes, including lower mortality, ARF, sepsis, and shock, as compared to males. There was no statistical difference between the two genders in LOS, total hospitalization charges, and ICU admission. Further prospective studies are needed to accurately understand these differences to guide clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cureus\",\"volume\":\"17 6\",\"pages\":\"e86371\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178571/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cureus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.86371\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.86371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:急性胰腺炎(AP)是一种常见的胃肠道疾病,经常需要住院治疗。本研究的目的是探讨性别是否会影响成年AP住院患者的预后。方法使用全国住院患者样本(NIS)数据库2020和国际疾病分类第十版临床修改(ICD-10-CM)代码,我们对成年AP住院患者进行了回顾性研究。我们比较了男性和女性AP住院患者的预后。主要结局是全因住院病人死亡率。次要结局是住院时间(LOS)、医疗保健总成本利用、急性肾功能衰竭(ARF)发生率、败血症、休克和入住重症监护病房(ICU)的需要。我们使用STATA Version 16.1进行统计分析。进行多变量逻辑回归分析,以评估性别是否是这些结果的独立预测因子,并调整任何混杂因素。结果2020年共收治成年AP患者252595例。平均年龄50.89岁,男性139180例(55.1%)。女性患者的慢性肾脏疾病患病率(9.26%比8.47%,P < 0.01)、充血性心力衰竭患病率(6.48%比5.69%,P < 0.01)、肥胖患病率(23.37%比17.39%,P < 0.01)较高。男性患者2型糖尿病(27.32%比24.68%,P < 0.01)、1型糖尿病(1.32%比1.25%,P = 0.5)、肝硬化(1.81%比1.75%,P = 0.61)、吸烟/吸烟(39.38%比29.28%,P < 0.01)患病率较高。女性住院死亡率(aOR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.51-0.82, P < 0.01)、ARF (aOR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.68-0.76, P < 0.01)、败血症(aOR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.63-0.75, P < 0.01)和休克(aOR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.62-0.89, P < 0.01)的可能性均显著低于男性。男女患者LOS、住院总费用、ICU住院率差异无统计学意义。我们发现,与男性相比,女性的临床结果有显著改善,包括更低的死亡率、ARF、败血症和休克。男女住院时间、住院总费用、ICU住院率差异无统计学意义。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来准确地了解这些差异,以指导临床实践。
Gender-Related Differences in Hospitalization Outcomes of Acute Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Analysis.
Background Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common gastrointestinal condition that frequently necessitates hospitalization. The aim of our study is to investigate whether gender affects the outcomes of adult patients hospitalized with AP. Methods Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database 2020 and the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes, we performed a retrospective study of adult patients admitted with AP. We compared inpatient outcomes of AP between males and females. The primary outcome was all-cause inpatient mortality. Secondary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), total healthcare cost utilization, incidence of acute renal failure (ARF), sepsis, shock, and the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. We used STATA Version 16.1 to perform the statistical analyses. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess if gender was an independent predictor for these outcomes and to adjust for any confounders. Results A total of 252,595 adult patients were admitted for AP in 2020. The mean age was 50.89 years, and 139,180 (55.1 %) of the patients were males. Female patients had a higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease (9.26% vs 8.47%, P < 0.01), congestive heart failure (6.48% vs 5.69%, P < 0.01), and obesity (23.37% vs 17.39%, P < 0.01). Male patients had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus type 2 (27.32% vs 24.68%, P < 0.01), diabetes mellitus type 1 (1.32% vs 1.25%, P = 0.5), liver cirrhosis (1.81% vs 1.75%, P = 0.61), and smoking/tobacco use (39.38% vs 29.28%, P < 0.01). Females had significantly lower likelihood of in-hospital mortality (aOR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.51-0.82, P < 0.01), ARF (aOR 0.72, 95% CI: 0.68-0.76, P < 0.01), sepsis (aOR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.63-0.75, P < 0.01), and shock (aOR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.62-0.89, P < 0.01) than males. There was no statistically significant difference between LOS, total hospitalization charges, and ICU admission between the two genders. Conclusions We found that females had significantly improved clinical outcomes, including lower mortality, ARF, sepsis, and shock, as compared to males. There was no statistical difference between the two genders in LOS, total hospitalization charges, and ICU admission. Further prospective studies are needed to accurately understand these differences to guide clinical practice.