Courtney Celian, Partha Ryali, Valentino Wilson, Adith Srivatsa, James L Patton
{"title":"一项随机试点试验:可穿戴抗重力辅助治疗不能改善慢性中风患者的手臂功能。","authors":"Courtney Celian, Partha Ryali, Valentino Wilson, Adith Srivatsa, James L Patton","doi":"10.1177/15459683251338792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundGravity confounds arm movement ability in post-stroke hemiparesis. Reducing its influence allows effective practice leading to recovery. Yet, there is a scarcity of wearable devices suitable for personalized use across diverse therapeutic activities in the clinic.ObjectiveIn this pilot study, we investigated the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of anti-gravity therapy using the ExoNET device in post-stroke participants.MethodsTwenty chronic stroke survivors underwent six, 45-minute occupational therapy sessions while wearing the ExoNET, randomized into either the treatment (ExoNET tuned to gravity-support) or control group (ExoNET tuned to slack condition). Clinical outcomes were evaluated by a blinded-rater at baseline, post, and 6-week follow-up sessions. Kinetic, kinematic, and patient experience outcomes were also assessed.ResultsNo significant effects were found between the treatment and control groups for Action Research Arm Test, Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity, and Wolf Motor Function Test scores though the treatment group showed an improvement in Box and Blocks scores in the post-intervention session (effect size = 2.1, <i>P</i> = .04). Direct kinetic effects revealed a significant reduction in muscle activity during free exploration with an effect size of (-7.12%, <i>P</i> < .005) but no longitudinal kinetic or kinematic trends. Subject feedback suggested a generally positive perception of the anti-gravity therapy.ConclusionsAnti-gravity therapy with the ExoNET is a safe and feasible treatment for post-stroke rehabilitation. The device provided anti-gravity forces, did not encumber range of motion, and clinical metrics of anti-gravity therapy demonstrated improvements in gross manual dexterity. Further research is required to explore potential benefits in broader clinical metrics.Trial Registration:This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID# NCT05180812).</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"728-741"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Wearable Anti-Gravity Supplement to Therapy Does Not Improve Arm Function in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Pilot Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Courtney Celian, Partha Ryali, Valentino Wilson, Adith Srivatsa, James L Patton\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15459683251338792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundGravity confounds arm movement ability in post-stroke hemiparesis. Reducing its influence allows effective practice leading to recovery. Yet, there is a scarcity of wearable devices suitable for personalized use across diverse therapeutic activities in the clinic.ObjectiveIn this pilot study, we investigated the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of anti-gravity therapy using the ExoNET device in post-stroke participants.MethodsTwenty chronic stroke survivors underwent six, 45-minute occupational therapy sessions while wearing the ExoNET, randomized into either the treatment (ExoNET tuned to gravity-support) or control group (ExoNET tuned to slack condition). Clinical outcomes were evaluated by a blinded-rater at baseline, post, and 6-week follow-up sessions. Kinetic, kinematic, and patient experience outcomes were also assessed.ResultsNo significant effects were found between the treatment and control groups for Action Research Arm Test, Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity, and Wolf Motor Function Test scores though the treatment group showed an improvement in Box and Blocks scores in the post-intervention session (effect size = 2.1, <i>P</i> = .04). Direct kinetic effects revealed a significant reduction in muscle activity during free exploration with an effect size of (-7.12%, <i>P</i> < .005) but no longitudinal kinetic or kinematic trends. Subject feedback suggested a generally positive perception of the anti-gravity therapy.ConclusionsAnti-gravity therapy with the ExoNET is a safe and feasible treatment for post-stroke rehabilitation. The device provided anti-gravity forces, did not encumber range of motion, and clinical metrics of anti-gravity therapy demonstrated improvements in gross manual dexterity. Further research is required to explore potential benefits in broader clinical metrics.Trial Registration:This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID# NCT05180812).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"728-741\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683251338792\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683251338792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Wearable Anti-Gravity Supplement to Therapy Does Not Improve Arm Function in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Pilot Trial.
BackgroundGravity confounds arm movement ability in post-stroke hemiparesis. Reducing its influence allows effective practice leading to recovery. Yet, there is a scarcity of wearable devices suitable for personalized use across diverse therapeutic activities in the clinic.ObjectiveIn this pilot study, we investigated the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of anti-gravity therapy using the ExoNET device in post-stroke participants.MethodsTwenty chronic stroke survivors underwent six, 45-minute occupational therapy sessions while wearing the ExoNET, randomized into either the treatment (ExoNET tuned to gravity-support) or control group (ExoNET tuned to slack condition). Clinical outcomes were evaluated by a blinded-rater at baseline, post, and 6-week follow-up sessions. Kinetic, kinematic, and patient experience outcomes were also assessed.ResultsNo significant effects were found between the treatment and control groups for Action Research Arm Test, Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity, and Wolf Motor Function Test scores though the treatment group showed an improvement in Box and Blocks scores in the post-intervention session (effect size = 2.1, P = .04). Direct kinetic effects revealed a significant reduction in muscle activity during free exploration with an effect size of (-7.12%, P < .005) but no longitudinal kinetic or kinematic trends. Subject feedback suggested a generally positive perception of the anti-gravity therapy.ConclusionsAnti-gravity therapy with the ExoNET is a safe and feasible treatment for post-stroke rehabilitation. The device provided anti-gravity forces, did not encumber range of motion, and clinical metrics of anti-gravity therapy demonstrated improvements in gross manual dexterity. Further research is required to explore potential benefits in broader clinical metrics.Trial Registration:This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID# NCT05180812).