肌电图辅助的肌肉骨骼模拟,同时优化肌肉兴奋和膝关节运动学。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Amir Esrafilian, Colin Smith, Jere Lavikainen, Lauri Stenroth, Mika E Mononen, Pasi A Karjalainen, David Saxby, David G Lloyd, Rami Korhonen
{"title":"肌电图辅助的肌肉骨骼模拟,同时优化肌肉兴奋和膝关节运动学。","authors":"Amir Esrafilian, Colin Smith, Jere Lavikainen, Lauri Stenroth, Mika E Mononen, Pasi A Karjalainen, David Saxby, David G Lloyd, Rami Korhonen","doi":"10.1115/1.4068973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we developed and validated an electromyography- (EMG) assisted musculoskeletal simulation framework with concurrent optimization of knee kinematics and muscle excitations. The musculoskeletal model had a 12 degree of freedom (DoF) knee joint with personalized articulating surfaces. First, model?s muscle parameters underwent calibration, followed by the EMG-assisted analysis. To assess model?s performance, we compared estimated knee biomechanics against four other simulation approaches, i.e., a 12 DoF knee model with either 1) uncalibrated EMG-assisted and 2) static-optimization (SO) neural solution; and a conventional 1 DoF knee model with either 3) EMG-assisted or 4) SO neural solution. The performance of the models was assessed against in vivo measured values from two grand challenge datasets. For estimated muscle excitations and joint contact force (JCF), the EMG-assisted models outperformed the SO solutions. Compared to the EMG-assisted 1 DoF knee, using EMG-assisted 12 DoF knee improved estimation of muscle excitations, joint moments, and transverse tibiofemoral JCF to a greater extent than compressive tibiofemoral JCF. To estimate compressive tibiofemoral JCF (during walking), the EMG-assisted model with personalized 1 DoF knee may suffice. However, the EMG-assisted 12 DoF knee model is recommended for a more accurate estimation of joint moments, muscle forces, and compressive and transverse tibiofemoral JCF, especially when these quantities can be affected, e.g., due to musculoskeletal disorders. The developed simulation framework provides a viable approach for estimating knee biomechanics accounting for personalized muscle excitation strategy and knee articulating geometries.</p>","PeriodicalId":54871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":" ","pages":"1-44"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An EMG-Assisted Musculoskeletal Simulation with Concurrent Optimization of Muscle Excitations and Knee Joint Kinematics.\",\"authors\":\"Amir Esrafilian, Colin Smith, Jere Lavikainen, Lauri Stenroth, Mika E Mononen, Pasi A Karjalainen, David Saxby, David G Lloyd, Rami Korhonen\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4068973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this study, we developed and validated an electromyography- (EMG) assisted musculoskeletal simulation framework with concurrent optimization of knee kinematics and muscle excitations. The musculoskeletal model had a 12 degree of freedom (DoF) knee joint with personalized articulating surfaces. First, model?s muscle parameters underwent calibration, followed by the EMG-assisted analysis. To assess model?s performance, we compared estimated knee biomechanics against four other simulation approaches, i.e., a 12 DoF knee model with either 1) uncalibrated EMG-assisted and 2) static-optimization (SO) neural solution; and a conventional 1 DoF knee model with either 3) EMG-assisted or 4) SO neural solution. The performance of the models was assessed against in vivo measured values from two grand challenge datasets. For estimated muscle excitations and joint contact force (JCF), the EMG-assisted models outperformed the SO solutions. Compared to the EMG-assisted 1 DoF knee, using EMG-assisted 12 DoF knee improved estimation of muscle excitations, joint moments, and transverse tibiofemoral JCF to a greater extent than compressive tibiofemoral JCF. To estimate compressive tibiofemoral JCF (during walking), the EMG-assisted model with personalized 1 DoF knee may suffice. However, the EMG-assisted 12 DoF knee model is recommended for a more accurate estimation of joint moments, muscle forces, and compressive and transverse tibiofemoral JCF, especially when these quantities can be affected, e.g., due to musculoskeletal disorders. The developed simulation framework provides a viable approach for estimating knee biomechanics accounting for personalized muscle excitation strategy and knee articulating geometries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4068973\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4068973","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,我们开发并验证了肌电图(EMG)辅助的肌肉骨骼模拟框架,该框架同时优化了膝关节运动学和肌肉兴奋。肌肉骨骼模型具有12个自由度(DoF)的膝关节,具有个性化的关节面。首先,模型?校正肌肉参数,然后进行肌电图辅助分析。评估模型?最后,我们将估计的膝关节生物力学与其他四种模拟方法进行了比较,即采用1)未校准肌电辅助和2)静态优化(SO)神经解的12自由度膝关节模型;另一种是传统的1自由度膝关节模型,采用肌电辅助或SO神经溶液。模型的性能是根据两个大挑战数据集的体内测量值进行评估的。对于估计的肌肉兴奋和关节接触力(JCF),肌电辅助模型优于SO解决方案。与肌电辅助下的1 DoF膝关节相比,肌电辅助下的12 DoF膝关节在更大程度上改善了肌肉兴奋、关节力矩和胫骨股横JCF的估计,而不是胫骨股横JCF。为了估计(行走时)压迫性胫股关节JCF,个体化1自由度膝肌电辅助模型可能就足够了。然而,肌电辅助的12自由度膝关节模型被推荐用于更准确地估计关节力矩、肌肉力、压缩和横向胫股JCF,特别是当这些量可能受到影响时,例如,由于肌肉骨骼疾病。开发的仿真框架为估计个性化肌肉激发策略和膝关节关节几何形状的膝关节生物力学提供了可行的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An EMG-Assisted Musculoskeletal Simulation with Concurrent Optimization of Muscle Excitations and Knee Joint Kinematics.

In this study, we developed and validated an electromyography- (EMG) assisted musculoskeletal simulation framework with concurrent optimization of knee kinematics and muscle excitations. The musculoskeletal model had a 12 degree of freedom (DoF) knee joint with personalized articulating surfaces. First, model?s muscle parameters underwent calibration, followed by the EMG-assisted analysis. To assess model?s performance, we compared estimated knee biomechanics against four other simulation approaches, i.e., a 12 DoF knee model with either 1) uncalibrated EMG-assisted and 2) static-optimization (SO) neural solution; and a conventional 1 DoF knee model with either 3) EMG-assisted or 4) SO neural solution. The performance of the models was assessed against in vivo measured values from two grand challenge datasets. For estimated muscle excitations and joint contact force (JCF), the EMG-assisted models outperformed the SO solutions. Compared to the EMG-assisted 1 DoF knee, using EMG-assisted 12 DoF knee improved estimation of muscle excitations, joint moments, and transverse tibiofemoral JCF to a greater extent than compressive tibiofemoral JCF. To estimate compressive tibiofemoral JCF (during walking), the EMG-assisted model with personalized 1 DoF knee may suffice. However, the EMG-assisted 12 DoF knee model is recommended for a more accurate estimation of joint moments, muscle forces, and compressive and transverse tibiofemoral JCF, especially when these quantities can be affected, e.g., due to musculoskeletal disorders. The developed simulation framework provides a viable approach for estimating knee biomechanics accounting for personalized muscle excitation strategy and knee articulating geometries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs and Prostheses; Bioinstrumentation and Measurements; Bioheat Transfer; Biomaterials; Biomechanics; Bioprocess Engineering; Cellular Mechanics; Design and Control of Biological Systems; Physiological Systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信