卫生专业教育中反种族主义教学法的结果:范围审查。

IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Amélie Blanchet Garneau, Patrick Lavoie, Marilou Bélisle, Christine Cassivi, Loloah Chamoun, Tringa Bytyqi
{"title":"卫生专业教育中反种族主义教学法的结果:范围审查。","authors":"Amélie Blanchet Garneau, Patrick Lavoie, Marilou Bélisle, Christine Cassivi, Loloah Chamoun, Tringa Bytyqi","doi":"10.1007/s10459-025-10448-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In health professions education, there is a call to rethink pedagogical practices and institutions that often perpetuate racism, colonialism, and other systems of oppression. Researchers have stressed the importance of integrating critical pedagogies, such as antiracist pedagogy, to help learners understand societal and structural factors behind health inequities and recognize power dynamics in health science and healthcare. Various antiracist pedagogical interventions have been designed, but their outcomes remain unclear. Based on Levac et al.'s framework, a scoping review was conducted to map the literature evaluating the outcomes of antiracist pedagogy in health professions education. A systematic database search was conducted between April and June 2022 for articles describing evaluation methods and outcomes of antiracist pedagogical interventions in health professions education. We included 41 articles in the final selection. The data was organized within the following themes: aim of intervention, type of intervention, evaluation tools, outcomes and indicators for each of Kirkpatrick's levels of training evaluation, theoretical frameworks, and authors' positionalities. The thematic analysis revealed that, in most cases, evaluations targeted participants' attitudes on systemic racism, their racial identity and critical awareness, as well as their satisfaction with the activities. The antiracist pedagogical interventions were rarely evaluated beyond learners' perceptions. Discrepancies were also raised between the principles of antiracist education and the use of antiracist pedagogy to design, implement and evaluate the outcomes of antiracist pedagogical interventions in health professions education. Although only a few interventions had transformative outcomes beyond individuals, we identified promising pedagogical strategies to foster engagement and motivation to transform professional practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of antiracist pedagogy in health professions education: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Amélie Blanchet Garneau, Patrick Lavoie, Marilou Bélisle, Christine Cassivi, Loloah Chamoun, Tringa Bytyqi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10459-025-10448-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In health professions education, there is a call to rethink pedagogical practices and institutions that often perpetuate racism, colonialism, and other systems of oppression. Researchers have stressed the importance of integrating critical pedagogies, such as antiracist pedagogy, to help learners understand societal and structural factors behind health inequities and recognize power dynamics in health science and healthcare. Various antiracist pedagogical interventions have been designed, but their outcomes remain unclear. Based on Levac et al.'s framework, a scoping review was conducted to map the literature evaluating the outcomes of antiracist pedagogy in health professions education. A systematic database search was conducted between April and June 2022 for articles describing evaluation methods and outcomes of antiracist pedagogical interventions in health professions education. We included 41 articles in the final selection. The data was organized within the following themes: aim of intervention, type of intervention, evaluation tools, outcomes and indicators for each of Kirkpatrick's levels of training evaluation, theoretical frameworks, and authors' positionalities. The thematic analysis revealed that, in most cases, evaluations targeted participants' attitudes on systemic racism, their racial identity and critical awareness, as well as their satisfaction with the activities. The antiracist pedagogical interventions were rarely evaluated beyond learners' perceptions. Discrepancies were also raised between the principles of antiracist education and the use of antiracist pedagogy to design, implement and evaluate the outcomes of antiracist pedagogical interventions in health professions education. Although only a few interventions had transformative outcomes beyond individuals, we identified promising pedagogical strategies to foster engagement and motivation to transform professional practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Health Sciences Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Health Sciences Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-025-10448-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-025-10448-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在卫生专业教育方面,人们呼吁重新思考经常使种族主义、殖民主义和其他压迫制度永久化的教学实践和制度。研究人员强调了整合批判教学法的重要性,例如反种族主义教学法,以帮助学习者理解卫生不平等背后的社会和结构因素,并认识到卫生科学和卫生保健中的权力动态。已经设计了各种反种族主义的教学干预措施,但其结果尚不清楚。基于Levac等人的框架,进行了范围审查,以绘制评估卫生专业教育中反种族主义教学法结果的文献。在2022年4月至6月期间,对描述卫生专业教育中反种族主义教学干预的评估方法和结果的文章进行了系统的数据库检索。最终入选的文章有41篇。数据按照以下主题进行组织:干预的目的、干预的类型、评估工具、Kirkpatrick的每一级培训评估的结果和指标、理论框架和作者的立场。专题分析显示,在大多数情况下,评价的目标是参与者对系统性种族主义的态度、他们的种族认同和批判意识,以及他们对活动的满意度。反种族主义的教学干预很少超出学习者的感知进行评估。还提出了反种族主义教育原则与利用反种族主义教学法设计、实施和评价卫生专业教育中反种族主义教学干预措施的成果之间的差异。虽然只有少数干预措施在个人之外产生了变革性的结果,但我们确定了有希望的教学策略,以促进参与和动机,转变专业实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of antiracist pedagogy in health professions education: a scoping review.

In health professions education, there is a call to rethink pedagogical practices and institutions that often perpetuate racism, colonialism, and other systems of oppression. Researchers have stressed the importance of integrating critical pedagogies, such as antiracist pedagogy, to help learners understand societal and structural factors behind health inequities and recognize power dynamics in health science and healthcare. Various antiracist pedagogical interventions have been designed, but their outcomes remain unclear. Based on Levac et al.'s framework, a scoping review was conducted to map the literature evaluating the outcomes of antiracist pedagogy in health professions education. A systematic database search was conducted between April and June 2022 for articles describing evaluation methods and outcomes of antiracist pedagogical interventions in health professions education. We included 41 articles in the final selection. The data was organized within the following themes: aim of intervention, type of intervention, evaluation tools, outcomes and indicators for each of Kirkpatrick's levels of training evaluation, theoretical frameworks, and authors' positionalities. The thematic analysis revealed that, in most cases, evaluations targeted participants' attitudes on systemic racism, their racial identity and critical awareness, as well as their satisfaction with the activities. The antiracist pedagogical interventions were rarely evaluated beyond learners' perceptions. Discrepancies were also raised between the principles of antiracist education and the use of antiracist pedagogy to design, implement and evaluate the outcomes of antiracist pedagogical interventions in health professions education. Although only a few interventions had transformative outcomes beyond individuals, we identified promising pedagogical strategies to foster engagement and motivation to transform professional practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信