Tong Zhang, Jiangxia Qin, Yanru Chen, Jianhui Dong, Tingting Yang, Hongyan Zhang, Yuxia Ma, Lin Han
{"title":"患者延迟与缺血性脑卒中预后:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Tong Zhang, Jiangxia Qin, Yanru Chen, Jianhui Dong, Tingting Yang, Hongyan Zhang, Yuxia Ma, Lin Han","doi":"10.1177/10547738251344818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The influence of patient delay on prognosis in patients with ischemic stroke remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the association of patient delay with the prognostic outcome of ischemic stroke. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, Wanfang Database, and VIP Database were comprehensively searched from inception to July 24, 2022. All case-control studies, cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria were retrieved; additionally, manual retrieval and literature tracing were performed. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies. Revman 5.3.5 software was used for meta-analysis. We included 14 studies (11 cohort studies and 3 case-control studies) involving 25,337 patients. The results of meta-analysis revealed that the delayed visit group of patients with ischemic stroke had a higher mortality rate, readmission rate, stroke recurrence rate, and adverse outcomes rate than the timely visit group. Among them, mortality (<i>OR</i> = 2.03, 95% CI [1.13, 3.65], <i>p</i> = .02), readmission (<i>OR</i> = 8.17, [4.70, 14.21], <i>p</i> < .001), stroke recurrence rate (<i>OR</i> = 2.66, [1.51, 4.69], <i>p</i> < .001), and adverse outcomes rate (<i>OR</i> = 2.07, [1.18, 3.61], <i>p</i> < .001), respectively. There was no statistical difference in the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score difference between the delayed visit group and the timely visit group (<i>MD</i> = 1.12, [-0.62, 2.86], <i>p</i> = .21). Patient delay affects the prognosis of patients with ischemic stroke and increases the risk of death, readmission, stroke recurrence, and adverse outcomes. In the future, more in-depth research is needed to verify and expand our research results.</p>","PeriodicalId":50677,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"10547738251344818"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Delay and Ischemic Stroke Prognosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Tong Zhang, Jiangxia Qin, Yanru Chen, Jianhui Dong, Tingting Yang, Hongyan Zhang, Yuxia Ma, Lin Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10547738251344818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The influence of patient delay on prognosis in patients with ischemic stroke remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the association of patient delay with the prognostic outcome of ischemic stroke. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, Wanfang Database, and VIP Database were comprehensively searched from inception to July 24, 2022. All case-control studies, cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria were retrieved; additionally, manual retrieval and literature tracing were performed. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies. Revman 5.3.5 software was used for meta-analysis. We included 14 studies (11 cohort studies and 3 case-control studies) involving 25,337 patients. The results of meta-analysis revealed that the delayed visit group of patients with ischemic stroke had a higher mortality rate, readmission rate, stroke recurrence rate, and adverse outcomes rate than the timely visit group. Among them, mortality (<i>OR</i> = 2.03, 95% CI [1.13, 3.65], <i>p</i> = .02), readmission (<i>OR</i> = 8.17, [4.70, 14.21], <i>p</i> < .001), stroke recurrence rate (<i>OR</i> = 2.66, [1.51, 4.69], <i>p</i> < .001), and adverse outcomes rate (<i>OR</i> = 2.07, [1.18, 3.61], <i>p</i> < .001), respectively. There was no statistical difference in the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score difference between the delayed visit group and the timely visit group (<i>MD</i> = 1.12, [-0.62, 2.86], <i>p</i> = .21). Patient delay affects the prognosis of patients with ischemic stroke and increases the risk of death, readmission, stroke recurrence, and adverse outcomes. In the future, more in-depth research is needed to verify and expand our research results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Nursing Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10547738251344818\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738251344818\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738251344818","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
患者延迟对缺血性脑卒中患者预后的影响尚不清楚。我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以确定患者延迟与缺血性卒中预后结果的关系。PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Library、CNKI、CBM、万方数据库、VIP数据库从成立到2022年7月24日进行综合检索。检索所有符合纳入标准的病例对照研究、队列研究和随机对照试验;此外,还进行了人工检索和文献追踪。两位审稿人独立筛选文献,提取数据,并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。采用Revman 5.3.5软件进行meta分析。我们纳入了14项研究(11项队列研究和3项病例对照研究),涉及25,337例患者。荟萃分析结果显示,延迟就诊组缺血性卒中患者的死亡率、再入院率、卒中复发率和不良结局率均高于及时就诊组。其中,死亡率(OR = 2.03, 95% CI [1.13, 3.65], p = .02点),重新接纳(或= 8.17,[4.70,14.21],p = 2.66, [1.51, 4.69], p = 2.07, [1.18, 3.61], p博士= 1.12,[-0.62,2.86],p = . 21)。患者延迟影响缺血性卒中患者的预后,并增加死亡、再入院、卒中复发和不良后果的风险。在未来,需要更深入的研究来验证和扩展我们的研究成果。
Patient Delay and Ischemic Stroke Prognosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
The influence of patient delay on prognosis in patients with ischemic stroke remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the association of patient delay with the prognostic outcome of ischemic stroke. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, Wanfang Database, and VIP Database were comprehensively searched from inception to July 24, 2022. All case-control studies, cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria were retrieved; additionally, manual retrieval and literature tracing were performed. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies. Revman 5.3.5 software was used for meta-analysis. We included 14 studies (11 cohort studies and 3 case-control studies) involving 25,337 patients. The results of meta-analysis revealed that the delayed visit group of patients with ischemic stroke had a higher mortality rate, readmission rate, stroke recurrence rate, and adverse outcomes rate than the timely visit group. Among them, mortality (OR = 2.03, 95% CI [1.13, 3.65], p = .02), readmission (OR = 8.17, [4.70, 14.21], p < .001), stroke recurrence rate (OR = 2.66, [1.51, 4.69], p < .001), and adverse outcomes rate (OR = 2.07, [1.18, 3.61], p < .001), respectively. There was no statistical difference in the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score difference between the delayed visit group and the timely visit group (MD = 1.12, [-0.62, 2.86], p = .21). Patient delay affects the prognosis of patients with ischemic stroke and increases the risk of death, readmission, stroke recurrence, and adverse outcomes. In the future, more in-depth research is needed to verify and expand our research results.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Nursing Research (CNR) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that addresses issues of clinical research that are meaningful to practicing nurses, providing an international forum to encourage discussion among clinical practitioners, enhance clinical practice by pinpointing potential clinical applications of the latest scholarly research, and disseminate research findings of particular interest to practicing nurses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).