利用3D扫描和打印技术提高学生对足部姿势评估的熟练程度。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Daniel R Bonanno, Sheree E Hurn, Helen A Banwell, Daniel Alizzi, Hylton B Menz
{"title":"利用3D扫描和打印技术提高学生对足部姿势评估的熟练程度。","authors":"Daniel R Bonanno, Sheree E Hurn, Helen A Banwell, Daniel Alizzi, Hylton B Menz","doi":"10.1002/jfa2.70056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Foot Posture Index (FPI-6), widely used to quantify foot posture, is a core component of musculoskeletal curricula in undergraduate podiatry programs. Teaching the FPI-6 can be challenging but 3D foot models provide a controlled risk-free way to practice, potentially reducing anxiety and increasing confidence. This study examined the effects of 3D foot models on podiatry students' confidence and anxiety when performing the FPI-6 and compared their scores to experts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty podiatry students from three Australian universities used the FPI-6 to score nine 3D printed foot models ranging from -11 (highly supinated) to +12 (highly pronated). Students' self-confidence and anxiety were measured before and after exposure to the 3D foot models using a 10-item self-confidence questionnaire and the 27-item Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2). Changes in self-confidence were analysed with paired t-tests, whereas median differences in CSAI-2 scores pre- and post-intervention were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Students' foot posture scores were compared to consensus scores from an expert panel (n = 4) with variability in agreement explored using the Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoA) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Student confidence improved across all 10 questionnaire items after the FPI-6 simulation with 3D foot models (p ≤ 0.015) with a mean increase of 8.6% across all items (range, 1.9%-11.6%) and medium to large effect sizes (Cohen's d = 0.44-0.94). On the CSAI-2, 22 of 27 items showed improvements in cognitive and somatic state anxiety or self-confidence (p ≤ 0.038), whereas five items showed no significant change. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed a small mean difference of 0.389 between student and expert consensus scores with 95% LoA ranging from -3.3 to 4.1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of 3D foot models for FPI-6 simulation enhances podiatry students' confidence and reduces anxiety. Student's foot posture scores had good overall agreement with expert scores, though some discrepancies remained. This highlights the value of pre-scored models for targeted practice and emphasises the importance of validation and feedback to ensure confidence aligns with accuracy. The models demonstrated high utility, harnessing 3D scanning and printing technology to enhance students' proficiency in assessing foot posture.</p>","PeriodicalId":49164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","volume":"18 2","pages":"e70056"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harnessing 3D Scanning and Printing Technology to Improve Students' Proficiency in Assessing Foot Posture.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel R Bonanno, Sheree E Hurn, Helen A Banwell, Daniel Alizzi, Hylton B Menz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jfa2.70056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Foot Posture Index (FPI-6), widely used to quantify foot posture, is a core component of musculoskeletal curricula in undergraduate podiatry programs. Teaching the FPI-6 can be challenging but 3D foot models provide a controlled risk-free way to practice, potentially reducing anxiety and increasing confidence. This study examined the effects of 3D foot models on podiatry students' confidence and anxiety when performing the FPI-6 and compared their scores to experts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty podiatry students from three Australian universities used the FPI-6 to score nine 3D printed foot models ranging from -11 (highly supinated) to +12 (highly pronated). Students' self-confidence and anxiety were measured before and after exposure to the 3D foot models using a 10-item self-confidence questionnaire and the 27-item Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2). Changes in self-confidence were analysed with paired t-tests, whereas median differences in CSAI-2 scores pre- and post-intervention were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Students' foot posture scores were compared to consensus scores from an expert panel (n = 4) with variability in agreement explored using the Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoA) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Student confidence improved across all 10 questionnaire items after the FPI-6 simulation with 3D foot models (p ≤ 0.015) with a mean increase of 8.6% across all items (range, 1.9%-11.6%) and medium to large effect sizes (Cohen's d = 0.44-0.94). On the CSAI-2, 22 of 27 items showed improvements in cognitive and somatic state anxiety or self-confidence (p ≤ 0.038), whereas five items showed no significant change. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed a small mean difference of 0.389 between student and expert consensus scores with 95% LoA ranging from -3.3 to 4.1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of 3D foot models for FPI-6 simulation enhances podiatry students' confidence and reduces anxiety. Student's foot posture scores had good overall agreement with expert scores, though some discrepancies remained. This highlights the value of pre-scored models for targeted practice and emphasises the importance of validation and feedback to ensure confidence aligns with accuracy. The models demonstrated high utility, harnessing 3D scanning and printing technology to enhance students' proficiency in assessing foot posture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"e70056\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70056\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脚部姿势指数(FPI-6)被广泛用于量化足部姿势,是本科足病专业肌肉骨骼课程的核心组成部分。教授FPI-6可能具有挑战性,但3D足部模型提供了一种可控的无风险练习方式,可能会减少焦虑并增加信心。本研究考察了3D足部模型对足科学生在执行FPI-6时的信心和焦虑的影响,并将他们的得分与专家进行了比较。方法:来自澳大利亚三所大学的50名足学学生使用FPI-6评分9个3D打印足模型,评分范围从-11(高度旋后)到+12(高度内旋)。采用10项自信问卷和27项竞争状态焦虑量表-2 (CSAI-2)测量学生接触三维足模型前后的自信和焦虑。使用配对t检验分析自信的变化,而使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验评估干预前和干预后CSAI-2得分的中位数差异。将学生的足部姿势得分与专家小组(n = 4)的共识得分进行比较,并使用Bland-Altman协议极限(LoA)分析探讨一致性的可变性。结果:在3D足部模型模拟FPI-6后,学生的信心在所有10个问卷项目中都有所提高(p≤0.015),所有项目平均增加8.6%(范围,1.9%-11.6%),中等到大的效应量(Cohen's d = 0.44-0.94)。在CSAI-2上,27个项目中有22个项目在认知状态、躯体状态焦虑或自信方面有改善(p≤0.038),而5个项目无显著变化。Bland-Altman分析显示,学生和专家共识分数之间的平均差异很小,为0.389,95%的LoA范围为-3.3至4.1。结论:利用三维足部模型进行FPI-6模拟,增强足科学生的自信心,减少焦虑。学生的足部姿势得分与专家得分总体一致,但仍存在一些差异。这突出了有针对性的实践预评分模型的价值,并强调验证和反馈的重要性,以确保信心与准确性保持一致。这些模型展示了很高的实用性,利用3D扫描和打印技术来提高学生评估足部姿势的熟练程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Harnessing 3D Scanning and Printing Technology to Improve Students' Proficiency in Assessing Foot Posture.

Introduction: The Foot Posture Index (FPI-6), widely used to quantify foot posture, is a core component of musculoskeletal curricula in undergraduate podiatry programs. Teaching the FPI-6 can be challenging but 3D foot models provide a controlled risk-free way to practice, potentially reducing anxiety and increasing confidence. This study examined the effects of 3D foot models on podiatry students' confidence and anxiety when performing the FPI-6 and compared their scores to experts.

Methods: Fifty podiatry students from three Australian universities used the FPI-6 to score nine 3D printed foot models ranging from -11 (highly supinated) to +12 (highly pronated). Students' self-confidence and anxiety were measured before and after exposure to the 3D foot models using a 10-item self-confidence questionnaire and the 27-item Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2). Changes in self-confidence were analysed with paired t-tests, whereas median differences in CSAI-2 scores pre- and post-intervention were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Students' foot posture scores were compared to consensus scores from an expert panel (n = 4) with variability in agreement explored using the Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoA) analysis.

Results: Student confidence improved across all 10 questionnaire items after the FPI-6 simulation with 3D foot models (p ≤ 0.015) with a mean increase of 8.6% across all items (range, 1.9%-11.6%) and medium to large effect sizes (Cohen's d = 0.44-0.94). On the CSAI-2, 22 of 27 items showed improvements in cognitive and somatic state anxiety or self-confidence (p ≤ 0.038), whereas five items showed no significant change. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed a small mean difference of 0.389 between student and expert consensus scores with 95% LoA ranging from -3.3 to 4.1.

Conclusion: The use of 3D foot models for FPI-6 simulation enhances podiatry students' confidence and reduces anxiety. Student's foot posture scores had good overall agreement with expert scores, though some discrepancies remained. This highlights the value of pre-scored models for targeted practice and emphasises the importance of validation and feedback to ensure confidence aligns with accuracy. The models demonstrated high utility, harnessing 3D scanning and printing technology to enhance students' proficiency in assessing foot posture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, the official journal of the Australian Podiatry Association and The College of Podiatry (UK), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of policy, organisation, delivery and clinical practice related to the assessment, diagnosis, prevention and management of foot and ankle disorders. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research covers a wide range of clinical subject areas, including diabetology, paediatrics, sports medicine, gerontology and geriatrics, foot surgery, physical therapy, dermatology, wound management, radiology, biomechanics and bioengineering, orthotics and prosthetics, as well the broad areas of epidemiology, policy, organisation and delivery of services related to foot and ankle care. The journal encourages submissions from all health professionals who manage lower limb conditions, including podiatrists, nurses, physical therapists and physiotherapists, orthopaedists, manual therapists, medical specialists and general medical practitioners, as well as health service researchers concerned with foot and ankle care. The Australian Podiatry Association and the College of Podiatry (UK) have reserve funds to cover the article-processing charge for manuscripts submitted by its members. Society members can email the appropriate contact at Australian Podiatry Association or The College of Podiatry to obtain the corresponding code to enter on submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信