{"title":"连续性中断:探索家庭医学教育和缓解战略的不连续性。","authors":"Lihani Du Plessis, Shelley Ross, Ann S Lee","doi":"10.1080/14739879.2025.2506086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuity of education (CoE) is a growing area of interest in health professions education, both for its impacts on learning (continuity of curriculum and continuity of supervision; CoS) and for its influence on patient care (continuity of patient care; CoPC). The COVID-19 pandemic offered an opportunity to examine discontinuity of education and the potential impacts of interruption to CoE, a knowledge gap in medical education research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted 14 semi-structured qualitative interviews involving participants from a Canadian family medicine programme. We recorded and transcribed interviews conducted on Zoom that were then analysed iteratively using reflexive thematic analysis to identify major themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified three themes. Theme 1: Changed relationships: an alteration due to mitigation strategies. Theme 2: Preparedness for practice: a decrease despite mitigation strategies. Theme 3: Adaptivity in the face of change: a consequence of mitigation strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that there are three main implications resulting from the impacts of disruption to CoE. Faculty development and curricular design are needed to support interrupted relationships, including finding ways to help faculty and residents nurture changed relationships. Physicians in their first 5 years of practice who have experienced disruption in their training may benefit from additional support to address the negative impact on their sense of preparedness for practice. Finally, the positives learned from this study can be used to face future disruptions to CoE.</p>","PeriodicalId":46436,"journal":{"name":"Education for Primary Care","volume":"36 4","pages":"157-166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuity interrupted: exploring discontinuity of education and mitigation strategies in family medicine.\",\"authors\":\"Lihani Du Plessis, Shelley Ross, Ann S Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14739879.2025.2506086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuity of education (CoE) is a growing area of interest in health professions education, both for its impacts on learning (continuity of curriculum and continuity of supervision; CoS) and for its influence on patient care (continuity of patient care; CoPC). The COVID-19 pandemic offered an opportunity to examine discontinuity of education and the potential impacts of interruption to CoE, a knowledge gap in medical education research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted 14 semi-structured qualitative interviews involving participants from a Canadian family medicine programme. We recorded and transcribed interviews conducted on Zoom that were then analysed iteratively using reflexive thematic analysis to identify major themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified three themes. Theme 1: Changed relationships: an alteration due to mitigation strategies. Theme 2: Preparedness for practice: a decrease despite mitigation strategies. Theme 3: Adaptivity in the face of change: a consequence of mitigation strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that there are three main implications resulting from the impacts of disruption to CoE. Faculty development and curricular design are needed to support interrupted relationships, including finding ways to help faculty and residents nurture changed relationships. Physicians in their first 5 years of practice who have experienced disruption in their training may benefit from additional support to address the negative impact on their sense of preparedness for practice. Finally, the positives learned from this study can be used to face future disruptions to CoE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education for Primary Care\",\"volume\":\"36 4\",\"pages\":\"157-166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education for Primary Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2025.2506086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2025.2506086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Continuity interrupted: exploring discontinuity of education and mitigation strategies in family medicine.
Background: Continuity of education (CoE) is a growing area of interest in health professions education, both for its impacts on learning (continuity of curriculum and continuity of supervision; CoS) and for its influence on patient care (continuity of patient care; CoPC). The COVID-19 pandemic offered an opportunity to examine discontinuity of education and the potential impacts of interruption to CoE, a knowledge gap in medical education research.
Methods: We conducted 14 semi-structured qualitative interviews involving participants from a Canadian family medicine programme. We recorded and transcribed interviews conducted on Zoom that were then analysed iteratively using reflexive thematic analysis to identify major themes.
Results: We identified three themes. Theme 1: Changed relationships: an alteration due to mitigation strategies. Theme 2: Preparedness for practice: a decrease despite mitigation strategies. Theme 3: Adaptivity in the face of change: a consequence of mitigation strategies.
Conclusion: This study suggests that there are three main implications resulting from the impacts of disruption to CoE. Faculty development and curricular design are needed to support interrupted relationships, including finding ways to help faculty and residents nurture changed relationships. Physicians in their first 5 years of practice who have experienced disruption in their training may benefit from additional support to address the negative impact on their sense of preparedness for practice. Finally, the positives learned from this study can be used to face future disruptions to CoE.
期刊介绍:
Education for Primary Care aims to reflect the best experience, expertise and innovative ideas in the development of undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing primary care education. The journal is UK based but welcomes contributions from all over the world. Readers will benefit from the broader perspectives on educational activities provided through the contributions of all health professionals, including general practitioners, nurses, midwives, health visitors, community nurses and managers. This sharing of experiences has the potential for enhancing healthcare delivery and for promoting interprofessional working.