废水监测的良好道德规范和实验室规范。

IF 2.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Rachel Hamant, Yuzhu Mao, Chunfu Liu, Alba Torrents, Birthe Kjellerup
{"title":"废水监测的良好道德规范和实验室规范。","authors":"Rachel Hamant, Yuzhu Mao, Chunfu Liu, Alba Torrents, Birthe Kjellerup","doi":"10.1002/wer.70112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wastewater Surveillance (WBS) is an approach for disease surveillance involving the screening of wastewater for RNA/DNA originating from infectious agents. In recent years, WBS has expanded to include analytes from pharmaceuticals (such as SSRI) or illicit drugs, referred to as \"High-risk Substances\" (HRS). The University of Maryland enacted in partnership with a local county public health department and water utility, a surveillance program to assess wastewater twice weekly for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 and other viral targets. WBS can provide rapid data showing where the location of clustered outbreaks may be occurring (specifically. The county public health department also requested that screening of high-risk substances (fentanyl, ketamine, Narcan, heroine, etc.) to be included in WBS, thus expanding the purview of the initial surveillance project focusing solely biological agents. A concern for any surveillance program is adhering to ethical standards, regulations, and protocols. In WBS, there is no single standardized \"list of rules\" to guide researchers in determining risk of privacy or community stigmatization. In an effort to counter the variation in WBS as it pertains to ethical standards, we propose utilizing an ethical scoring framework tailored for WBS. This framework includes a scoresheet that can assist scientists determine the privacy and ethical risks associated with their study by introducing a quantifiable process to assess ethical compliance. Furthermore, we include a flow map outlining standard laboratory practices under the lens of how each step assists in maintaining sample fidelity, thus increasing the robustness and reliability of the data generated. SUMMARY: It is important to balance ethical standards, public health and research strategies. Application of the tools listed in this document will ensure this balance. Application of the developed ethical guidelines (Score sheet) is a practical approach. It is important to integrate vigorous data management practices. Utilization of a robust and holistic structure of the wastewater surveillance program will ensure successful outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23621,"journal":{"name":"Water Environment Research","volume":"97 6","pages":"e70112"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178841/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Good Ethical and Laboratory Practices for Wastewater Surveillance.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Hamant, Yuzhu Mao, Chunfu Liu, Alba Torrents, Birthe Kjellerup\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wer.70112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Wastewater Surveillance (WBS) is an approach for disease surveillance involving the screening of wastewater for RNA/DNA originating from infectious agents. In recent years, WBS has expanded to include analytes from pharmaceuticals (such as SSRI) or illicit drugs, referred to as \\\"High-risk Substances\\\" (HRS). The University of Maryland enacted in partnership with a local county public health department and water utility, a surveillance program to assess wastewater twice weekly for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 and other viral targets. WBS can provide rapid data showing where the location of clustered outbreaks may be occurring (specifically. The county public health department also requested that screening of high-risk substances (fentanyl, ketamine, Narcan, heroine, etc.) to be included in WBS, thus expanding the purview of the initial surveillance project focusing solely biological agents. A concern for any surveillance program is adhering to ethical standards, regulations, and protocols. In WBS, there is no single standardized \\\"list of rules\\\" to guide researchers in determining risk of privacy or community stigmatization. In an effort to counter the variation in WBS as it pertains to ethical standards, we propose utilizing an ethical scoring framework tailored for WBS. This framework includes a scoresheet that can assist scientists determine the privacy and ethical risks associated with their study by introducing a quantifiable process to assess ethical compliance. Furthermore, we include a flow map outlining standard laboratory practices under the lens of how each step assists in maintaining sample fidelity, thus increasing the robustness and reliability of the data generated. SUMMARY: It is important to balance ethical standards, public health and research strategies. Application of the tools listed in this document will ensure this balance. Application of the developed ethical guidelines (Score sheet) is a practical approach. It is important to integrate vigorous data management practices. Utilization of a robust and holistic structure of the wastewater surveillance program will ensure successful outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Environment Research\",\"volume\":\"97 6\",\"pages\":\"e70112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178841/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Environment Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.70112\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Environment Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.70112","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

废水监测(WBS)是一种疾病监测方法,涉及筛选废水中源自传染源的RNA/DNA。近年来,WBS已扩展到包括药品(如SSRI)或非法药物的分析物,称为“高风险物质”(HRS)。马里兰大学与当地县公共卫生部门和水务公司合作,制定了一项监测计划,每周两次评估废水中是否存在SARS-CoV-2和其他病毒目标。世卫组织可以提供快速数据,显示可能发生聚集性疫情的地点(具体而言)。该县公共卫生部门还要求将高风险物质(芬太尼、氯胺酮、纳洛酮、海洛因等)的筛查纳入WBS,从而扩大了最初监测项目的范围,只关注生物制剂。任何监控项目都需要考虑遵守道德标准、法规和协议。在WBS中,没有单一的标准化“规则列表”来指导研究人员确定隐私或社区污名化的风险。为了应对WBS中涉及道德标准的变化,我们建议使用为WBS量身定制的道德评分框架。该框架包括一个计分表,通过引入一个可量化的过程来评估道德合规,可以帮助科学家确定与他们的研究相关的隐私和道德风险。此外,我们还包括一个流程图,概述了在每个步骤如何帮助保持样本保真度的镜头下的标准实验室实践,从而增加生成数据的鲁棒性和可靠性。摘要:平衡伦理标准、公共卫生和研究策略是很重要的。应用本文档中列出的工具将确保这种平衡。应用已开发的道德准则(计分表)是一种实用的方法。整合有力的数据管理实践非常重要。利用一个强大的整体结构的废水监测计划将确保成功的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Good Ethical and Laboratory Practices for Wastewater Surveillance.

Wastewater Surveillance (WBS) is an approach for disease surveillance involving the screening of wastewater for RNA/DNA originating from infectious agents. In recent years, WBS has expanded to include analytes from pharmaceuticals (such as SSRI) or illicit drugs, referred to as "High-risk Substances" (HRS). The University of Maryland enacted in partnership with a local county public health department and water utility, a surveillance program to assess wastewater twice weekly for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 and other viral targets. WBS can provide rapid data showing where the location of clustered outbreaks may be occurring (specifically. The county public health department also requested that screening of high-risk substances (fentanyl, ketamine, Narcan, heroine, etc.) to be included in WBS, thus expanding the purview of the initial surveillance project focusing solely biological agents. A concern for any surveillance program is adhering to ethical standards, regulations, and protocols. In WBS, there is no single standardized "list of rules" to guide researchers in determining risk of privacy or community stigmatization. In an effort to counter the variation in WBS as it pertains to ethical standards, we propose utilizing an ethical scoring framework tailored for WBS. This framework includes a scoresheet that can assist scientists determine the privacy and ethical risks associated with their study by introducing a quantifiable process to assess ethical compliance. Furthermore, we include a flow map outlining standard laboratory practices under the lens of how each step assists in maintaining sample fidelity, thus increasing the robustness and reliability of the data generated. SUMMARY: It is important to balance ethical standards, public health and research strategies. Application of the tools listed in this document will ensure this balance. Application of the developed ethical guidelines (Score sheet) is a practical approach. It is important to integrate vigorous data management practices. Utilization of a robust and holistic structure of the wastewater surveillance program will ensure successful outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Water Environment Research
Water Environment Research 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
138
审稿时长
11 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1928, Water Environment Research (WER) is an international multidisciplinary water resource management journal for the dissemination of fundamental and applied research in all scientific and technical areas related to water quality and resource recovery. WER''s goal is to foster communication and interdisciplinary research between water sciences and related fields such as environmental toxicology, agriculture, public and occupational health, microbiology, and ecology. In addition to original research articles, short communications, case studies, reviews, and perspectives are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信