Yvette Raymond, Shavi Fernando, Ben W Mol, Melody Menezes, Andrew McLennan, Simon Meagher, Amy Hill, Daniel L Rolnik
{"title":"胎儿染色体失衡的全基因组无细胞DNA筛查的患者偏好和理解:一项调查研究。","authors":"Yvette Raymond, Shavi Fernando, Ben W Mol, Melody Menezes, Andrew McLennan, Simon Meagher, Amy Hill, Daniel L Rolnik","doi":"10.1002/pd.6842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess parental preferences, expectations and understanding of genome-wide cell-free DNA screening (gwNIPT) in Australia.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional survey study utilizing an anonymous electronic questionnaire was conducted across three participating screening services in Australia between September 2023 and November 2024. Questions pertained to respondent demographics, pre-screening counselling, and accuracy expectations of gwNIPT for various chromosomal anomalies. Statistical analyses to investigate associations between responses used Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests, ordinal logistic regression, and the Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 329 survey responses recorded, of which 216 were completed (65.7%). The most frequent source of NIPT referral was a medical doctor (74.1%), and the most common duration of pre-screening counselling was 5 minutes (41.0%). Respondents showed overwhelming interest in all anomalies included in gwNIPT as well as various phenotypic outcomes including those of uncertain clinical significance. Despite this, only a minority of patients were aware that they were undergoing genome-wide screening (38.2%), and respondents did not anticipate a statistically significant difference in screening accuracy across different anomaly types (p = 0.715).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Respondents undergoing gwNIPT indicated a preference to receive as much genetic information about their pregnancies as possible. Pre-screening counselling should therefore include the limitations of gwNIPT.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"994-1003"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Preferences and Understanding of Genome-Wide Cell-Free DNA Screening for Foetal Chromosomal Imbalances: A Survey Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yvette Raymond, Shavi Fernando, Ben W Mol, Melody Menezes, Andrew McLennan, Simon Meagher, Amy Hill, Daniel L Rolnik\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pd.6842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess parental preferences, expectations and understanding of genome-wide cell-free DNA screening (gwNIPT) in Australia.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional survey study utilizing an anonymous electronic questionnaire was conducted across three participating screening services in Australia between September 2023 and November 2024. Questions pertained to respondent demographics, pre-screening counselling, and accuracy expectations of gwNIPT for various chromosomal anomalies. Statistical analyses to investigate associations between responses used Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests, ordinal logistic regression, and the Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 329 survey responses recorded, of which 216 were completed (65.7%). The most frequent source of NIPT referral was a medical doctor (74.1%), and the most common duration of pre-screening counselling was 5 minutes (41.0%). Respondents showed overwhelming interest in all anomalies included in gwNIPT as well as various phenotypic outcomes including those of uncertain clinical significance. Despite this, only a minority of patients were aware that they were undergoing genome-wide screening (38.2%), and respondents did not anticipate a statistically significant difference in screening accuracy across different anomaly types (p = 0.715).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Respondents undergoing gwNIPT indicated a preference to receive as much genetic information about their pregnancies as possible. Pre-screening counselling should therefore include the limitations of gwNIPT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prenatal Diagnosis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"994-1003\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254435/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prenatal Diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6842\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6842","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient Preferences and Understanding of Genome-Wide Cell-Free DNA Screening for Foetal Chromosomal Imbalances: A Survey Study.
Objective: To assess parental preferences, expectations and understanding of genome-wide cell-free DNA screening (gwNIPT) in Australia.
Method: A cross-sectional survey study utilizing an anonymous electronic questionnaire was conducted across three participating screening services in Australia between September 2023 and November 2024. Questions pertained to respondent demographics, pre-screening counselling, and accuracy expectations of gwNIPT for various chromosomal anomalies. Statistical analyses to investigate associations between responses used Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests, ordinal logistic regression, and the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Results: There were 329 survey responses recorded, of which 216 were completed (65.7%). The most frequent source of NIPT referral was a medical doctor (74.1%), and the most common duration of pre-screening counselling was 5 minutes (41.0%). Respondents showed overwhelming interest in all anomalies included in gwNIPT as well as various phenotypic outcomes including those of uncertain clinical significance. Despite this, only a minority of patients were aware that they were undergoing genome-wide screening (38.2%), and respondents did not anticipate a statistically significant difference in screening accuracy across different anomaly types (p = 0.715).
Conclusion: Respondents undergoing gwNIPT indicated a preference to receive as much genetic information about their pregnancies as possible. Pre-screening counselling should therefore include the limitations of gwNIPT.
期刊介绍:
Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling