胎儿染色体失衡的全基因组无细胞DNA筛查的患者偏好和理解:一项调查研究。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Prenatal Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-19 DOI:10.1002/pd.6842
Yvette Raymond, Shavi Fernando, Ben W Mol, Melody Menezes, Andrew McLennan, Simon Meagher, Amy Hill, Daniel L Rolnik
{"title":"胎儿染色体失衡的全基因组无细胞DNA筛查的患者偏好和理解:一项调查研究。","authors":"Yvette Raymond, Shavi Fernando, Ben W Mol, Melody Menezes, Andrew McLennan, Simon Meagher, Amy Hill, Daniel L Rolnik","doi":"10.1002/pd.6842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess parental preferences, expectations and understanding of genome-wide cell-free DNA screening (gwNIPT) in Australia.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional survey study utilizing an anonymous electronic questionnaire was conducted across three participating screening services in Australia between September 2023 and November 2024. Questions pertained to respondent demographics, pre-screening counselling, and accuracy expectations of gwNIPT for various chromosomal anomalies. Statistical analyses to investigate associations between responses used Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests, ordinal logistic regression, and the Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 329 survey responses recorded, of which 216 were completed (65.7%). The most frequent source of NIPT referral was a medical doctor (74.1%), and the most common duration of pre-screening counselling was 5 minutes (41.0%). Respondents showed overwhelming interest in all anomalies included in gwNIPT as well as various phenotypic outcomes including those of uncertain clinical significance. Despite this, only a minority of patients were aware that they were undergoing genome-wide screening (38.2%), and respondents did not anticipate a statistically significant difference in screening accuracy across different anomaly types (p = 0.715).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Respondents undergoing gwNIPT indicated a preference to receive as much genetic information about their pregnancies as possible. Pre-screening counselling should therefore include the limitations of gwNIPT.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"994-1003"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Preferences and Understanding of Genome-Wide Cell-Free DNA Screening for Foetal Chromosomal Imbalances: A Survey Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yvette Raymond, Shavi Fernando, Ben W Mol, Melody Menezes, Andrew McLennan, Simon Meagher, Amy Hill, Daniel L Rolnik\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pd.6842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess parental preferences, expectations and understanding of genome-wide cell-free DNA screening (gwNIPT) in Australia.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional survey study utilizing an anonymous electronic questionnaire was conducted across three participating screening services in Australia between September 2023 and November 2024. Questions pertained to respondent demographics, pre-screening counselling, and accuracy expectations of gwNIPT for various chromosomal anomalies. Statistical analyses to investigate associations between responses used Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests, ordinal logistic regression, and the Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 329 survey responses recorded, of which 216 were completed (65.7%). The most frequent source of NIPT referral was a medical doctor (74.1%), and the most common duration of pre-screening counselling was 5 minutes (41.0%). Respondents showed overwhelming interest in all anomalies included in gwNIPT as well as various phenotypic outcomes including those of uncertain clinical significance. Despite this, only a minority of patients were aware that they were undergoing genome-wide screening (38.2%), and respondents did not anticipate a statistically significant difference in screening accuracy across different anomaly types (p = 0.715).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Respondents undergoing gwNIPT indicated a preference to receive as much genetic information about their pregnancies as possible. Pre-screening counselling should therefore include the limitations of gwNIPT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prenatal Diagnosis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"994-1003\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254435/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prenatal Diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6842\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6842","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估澳大利亚父母对全基因组无细胞DNA筛查(gwNIPT)的偏好、期望和理解。方法:在2023年9月至2024年11月期间,在澳大利亚的三个参与筛查服务机构中使用匿名电子问卷进行横断面调查研究。问题涉及被调查者的人口统计、筛查前咨询和gwNIPT对各种染色体异常的准确性期望。统计分析使用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验、有序逻辑回归和Kruskal-Wallis检验来调查反应之间的关联。结果:共记录问卷329份,完成216份(65.7%)。最常见的NIPT转诊来源是医生(74.1%),最常见的筛查前咨询时间为5分钟(41.0%)。受访者对gwNIPT中包括的所有异常以及各种表型结果(包括临床意义不确定的结果)表现出压倒性的兴趣。尽管如此,只有少数患者意识到他们正在进行全基因组筛查(38.2%),受访者没有预料到不同异常类型的筛查准确性有统计学显著差异(p = 0.715)。结论:接受gwNIPT的受访者表示希望尽可能多地获得有关其怀孕的遗传信息。因此,筛查前咨询应包括gwNIPT的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient Preferences and Understanding of Genome-Wide Cell-Free DNA Screening for Foetal Chromosomal Imbalances: A Survey Study.

Objective: To assess parental preferences, expectations and understanding of genome-wide cell-free DNA screening (gwNIPT) in Australia.

Method: A cross-sectional survey study utilizing an anonymous electronic questionnaire was conducted across three participating screening services in Australia between September 2023 and November 2024. Questions pertained to respondent demographics, pre-screening counselling, and accuracy expectations of gwNIPT for various chromosomal anomalies. Statistical analyses to investigate associations between responses used Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests, ordinal logistic regression, and the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results: There were 329 survey responses recorded, of which 216 were completed (65.7%). The most frequent source of NIPT referral was a medical doctor (74.1%), and the most common duration of pre-screening counselling was 5 minutes (41.0%). Respondents showed overwhelming interest in all anomalies included in gwNIPT as well as various phenotypic outcomes including those of uncertain clinical significance. Despite this, only a minority of patients were aware that they were undergoing genome-wide screening (38.2%), and respondents did not anticipate a statistically significant difference in screening accuracy across different anomaly types (p = 0.715).

Conclusion: Respondents undergoing gwNIPT indicated a preference to receive as much genetic information about their pregnancies as possible. Pre-screening counselling should therefore include the limitations of gwNIPT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
204
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信