可及康复是可行的,并导致选定的心脏和/或肺移植受者的功能获得。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
PM&R Pub Date : 2025-06-19 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13433
Jane Wu, Sonali Thakkar, Christine T Shiner, Yuriko Watanabe, Kavitha Muthiah, Steven G Faux
{"title":"可及康复是可行的,并导致选定的心脏和/或肺移植受者的功能获得。","authors":"Jane Wu, Sonali Thakkar, Christine T Shiner, Yuriko Watanabe, Kavitha Muthiah, Steven G Faux","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In-reach rehabilitation is a relatively new model of care available in a small number of Australian public hospitals. These multidisciplinary teams deliver evidence-based structured rehabilitation to carefully selected patients during acute care. There are no published rehabilitation outcomes in heart and/or lung transplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the rehabilitation outcomes of a cohort of heart and/or lung transplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>One metropolitan institution with the largest heart and lung transplant service in Australia.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Between 2014 and 2023, a total of 957 heart and/or lung transplants were performed at this institution.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>In-reach rehabilitation was delivered to selected patients during the 10-year period. However, from 2019 onwards, patients were proactively screened by the rehabilitation team for eligibility as well as referred from the acute transplant teams.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Functional independence measure (FIM) changes and percentage of patients going to inpatient rehabilitation after completion of acute care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In-reach rehabilitation was received by 223 (24.3%) patients. With the exception of three patients (who died), the vast majority were able to complete an in-reach rehabilitation program and were discharged to the community (n = 98, 43.9%), inpatient rehabilitation (n = 119, 53.4%), or transferred to another hospital (n = 3, 1.3%), demonstrating feasibility. Across the cohort, the median admission and discharge FIM scores were 77.0 (interquartile range, 60-94.8) and 100 (interquartile range, 77-118), respectively, demonstrating significant functional improvements from start to finish of the in-reach rehabilitation program (p < .001). Over this period, the number of patients discharged to inpatient rehabilitation decreased as a proportion of the total number of transplants (25.7% in 2014, 47.8% in 2017, 34.7% in 2019, 26.2% in 2021, 8.0% in 2023). Proactive rehabilitation screening implemented from 2019 allowed for earlier and longer program delivery to more patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In-reach rehabilitation is feasible in acute care after heart and/or lung transplantation and was associated with functional improvements. The addition of proactive rehabilitation screening appeared to improve the effectiveness of the in-reach rehabilitation program.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-reach rehabilitation is feasible and led to functional gains in selected heart and/or lung transplantation recipients.\",\"authors\":\"Jane Wu, Sonali Thakkar, Christine T Shiner, Yuriko Watanabe, Kavitha Muthiah, Steven G Faux\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pmrj.13433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In-reach rehabilitation is a relatively new model of care available in a small number of Australian public hospitals. These multidisciplinary teams deliver evidence-based structured rehabilitation to carefully selected patients during acute care. There are no published rehabilitation outcomes in heart and/or lung transplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the rehabilitation outcomes of a cohort of heart and/or lung transplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>One metropolitan institution with the largest heart and lung transplant service in Australia.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Between 2014 and 2023, a total of 957 heart and/or lung transplants were performed at this institution.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>In-reach rehabilitation was delivered to selected patients during the 10-year period. However, from 2019 onwards, patients were proactively screened by the rehabilitation team for eligibility as well as referred from the acute transplant teams.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Functional independence measure (FIM) changes and percentage of patients going to inpatient rehabilitation after completion of acute care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In-reach rehabilitation was received by 223 (24.3%) patients. With the exception of three patients (who died), the vast majority were able to complete an in-reach rehabilitation program and were discharged to the community (n = 98, 43.9%), inpatient rehabilitation (n = 119, 53.4%), or transferred to another hospital (n = 3, 1.3%), demonstrating feasibility. Across the cohort, the median admission and discharge FIM scores were 77.0 (interquartile range, 60-94.8) and 100 (interquartile range, 77-118), respectively, demonstrating significant functional improvements from start to finish of the in-reach rehabilitation program (p < .001). Over this period, the number of patients discharged to inpatient rehabilitation decreased as a proportion of the total number of transplants (25.7% in 2014, 47.8% in 2017, 34.7% in 2019, 26.2% in 2021, 8.0% in 2023). Proactive rehabilitation screening implemented from 2019 allowed for earlier and longer program delivery to more patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In-reach rehabilitation is feasible in acute care after heart and/or lung transplantation and was associated with functional improvements. The addition of proactive rehabilitation screening appeared to improve the effectiveness of the in-reach rehabilitation program.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PM&R\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PM&R\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13433\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13433","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:触手可及康复是澳大利亚少数公立医院提供的一种相对较新的护理模式。这些多学科团队在急性护理期间为精心挑选的患者提供循证结构化康复。心脏和/或肺移植受者的康复结果尚未公布。目的:描述心脏和/或肺移植受者队列的康复结果。设计:回顾性队列研究。环境:拥有澳大利亚最大的心脏和肺移植服务的大都市机构。患者:2014年至2023年间,该机构共进行了957例心脏和/或肺移植手术。干预措施:在10年期间对选定的患者进行可及康复治疗。然而,从2019年起,康复团队主动筛选患者的资格,并从急性移植团队转介。主要观察指标:功能独立测量(FIM)变化及急症护理结束后住院康复患者比例。结果:223例(24.3%)患者获得触手可及康复。除3例患者(死亡)外,绝大多数患者能够完成触手可及的康复计划,并出院到社区(n = 98, 43.9%),住院康复(n = 119, 53.4%)或转移到其他医院(n = 3, 1.3%),证明了可行性。在整个队列中,入院和出院时的中位FIM评分分别为77.0(四分位数范围,60-94.8)和100(四分位数范围,77-118),表明从开始到结束可及康复计划的功能显著改善(p结论:可及康复在心脏和/或肺移植后的急性护理中是可行的,并与功能改善相关。主动康复筛查的加入似乎提高了触手可及的康复计划的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In-reach rehabilitation is feasible and led to functional gains in selected heart and/or lung transplantation recipients.

Background: In-reach rehabilitation is a relatively new model of care available in a small number of Australian public hospitals. These multidisciplinary teams deliver evidence-based structured rehabilitation to carefully selected patients during acute care. There are no published rehabilitation outcomes in heart and/or lung transplant recipients.

Objective: To describe the rehabilitation outcomes of a cohort of heart and/or lung transplant recipients.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: One metropolitan institution with the largest heart and lung transplant service in Australia.

Patients: Between 2014 and 2023, a total of 957 heart and/or lung transplants were performed at this institution.

Intervention: In-reach rehabilitation was delivered to selected patients during the 10-year period. However, from 2019 onwards, patients were proactively screened by the rehabilitation team for eligibility as well as referred from the acute transplant teams.

Main outcome measures: Functional independence measure (FIM) changes and percentage of patients going to inpatient rehabilitation after completion of acute care.

Results: In-reach rehabilitation was received by 223 (24.3%) patients. With the exception of three patients (who died), the vast majority were able to complete an in-reach rehabilitation program and were discharged to the community (n = 98, 43.9%), inpatient rehabilitation (n = 119, 53.4%), or transferred to another hospital (n = 3, 1.3%), demonstrating feasibility. Across the cohort, the median admission and discharge FIM scores were 77.0 (interquartile range, 60-94.8) and 100 (interquartile range, 77-118), respectively, demonstrating significant functional improvements from start to finish of the in-reach rehabilitation program (p < .001). Over this period, the number of patients discharged to inpatient rehabilitation decreased as a proportion of the total number of transplants (25.7% in 2014, 47.8% in 2017, 34.7% in 2019, 26.2% in 2021, 8.0% in 2023). Proactive rehabilitation screening implemented from 2019 allowed for earlier and longer program delivery to more patients.

Conclusions: In-reach rehabilitation is feasible in acute care after heart and/or lung transplantation and was associated with functional improvements. The addition of proactive rehabilitation screening appeared to improve the effectiveness of the in-reach rehabilitation program.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信