Stephanie Young, Julia Greene, Daniel Milgrom, Jessica Weiss, Melanie Goldfarb, Anton Bilchik
{"title":"细胞减少手术在转移性结直肠癌中越来越重要的作用——更有效的全身治疗时代的国家趋势。","authors":"Stephanie Young, Julia Greene, Daniel Milgrom, Jessica Weiss, Melanie Goldfarb, Anton Bilchik","doi":"10.1002/jso.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Treatment guidelines on cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) continue to have variability. This study investigated survival outcomes and utilization trends of CRS on mCRC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from the National Cancer Database with mCRC who received systemic chemotherapy 2004-2015 were categorized by colectomy, colectomy and metastasectomy (CRS), and no surgery (NS). Kaplan-Meier analyses with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 88 593 patients in the study cohort, 39 028 had a colectomy, 21 462 CRS, and 28 103 NS. CRS utilization increased from 33.1% (2004) to 38.3% (2015). CRS (aHR = 0.36) and colectomy (aHR = 0.47) were associated with significantly improved OS compared to NS. Median OS with IPTW remained longer in CRS versus colectomy versus NS (34.4 months vs. 26.7 vs. 13.2) (p < 0.001). Patients who received hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) had improved OS compared to non-HIPEC patients (aHR = 0.55, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>National utilization of CRS for mCRC is steadily increasing and associated with improved OS, supporting the use of more aggressive surgical approaches in select patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Increasing Role for Cytoreductive Surgery in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-National Trends in the Era of More Effective Systemic Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Young, Julia Greene, Daniel Milgrom, Jessica Weiss, Melanie Goldfarb, Anton Bilchik\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.70012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Treatment guidelines on cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) continue to have variability. This study investigated survival outcomes and utilization trends of CRS on mCRC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from the National Cancer Database with mCRC who received systemic chemotherapy 2004-2015 were categorized by colectomy, colectomy and metastasectomy (CRS), and no surgery (NS). Kaplan-Meier analyses with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 88 593 patients in the study cohort, 39 028 had a colectomy, 21 462 CRS, and 28 103 NS. CRS utilization increased from 33.1% (2004) to 38.3% (2015). CRS (aHR = 0.36) and colectomy (aHR = 0.47) were associated with significantly improved OS compared to NS. Median OS with IPTW remained longer in CRS versus colectomy versus NS (34.4 months vs. 26.7 vs. 13.2) (p < 0.001). Patients who received hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) had improved OS compared to non-HIPEC patients (aHR = 0.55, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>National utilization of CRS for mCRC is steadily increasing and associated with improved OS, supporting the use of more aggressive surgical approaches in select patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70012\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
An Increasing Role for Cytoreductive Surgery in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-National Trends in the Era of More Effective Systemic Therapy.
Background and objectives: Treatment guidelines on cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) continue to have variability. This study investigated survival outcomes and utilization trends of CRS on mCRC.
Methods: Patients from the National Cancer Database with mCRC who received systemic chemotherapy 2004-2015 were categorized by colectomy, colectomy and metastasectomy (CRS), and no surgery (NS). Kaplan-Meier analyses with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed.
Results: Of 88 593 patients in the study cohort, 39 028 had a colectomy, 21 462 CRS, and 28 103 NS. CRS utilization increased from 33.1% (2004) to 38.3% (2015). CRS (aHR = 0.36) and colectomy (aHR = 0.47) were associated with significantly improved OS compared to NS. Median OS with IPTW remained longer in CRS versus colectomy versus NS (34.4 months vs. 26.7 vs. 13.2) (p < 0.001). Patients who received hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) had improved OS compared to non-HIPEC patients (aHR = 0.55, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: National utilization of CRS for mCRC is steadily increasing and associated with improved OS, supporting the use of more aggressive surgical approaches in select patients.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.