手术经验对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后临床结果的影响。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Korean Circulation Journal Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-14 DOI:10.4070/kcj.2024.0318
Woochan Kwon, Ki Hong Choi, Young Bin Song, Joo Myung Lee, Taek Kyu Park, Jeong Hoon Yang, Joo-Yong Hahn, Seung-Hyuk Choi, Jae-Hwan Lee, Min Chul Kim, Hyun-Jong Lee, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
{"title":"手术经验对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后临床结果的影响。","authors":"Woochan Kwon, Ki Hong Choi, Young Bin Song, Joo Myung Lee, Taek Kyu Park, Jeong Hoon Yang, Joo-Yong Hahn, Seung-Hyuk Choi, Jae-Hwan Lee, Min Chul Kim, Hyun-Jong Lee, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon","doi":"10.4070/kcj.2024.0318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Rotational atherectomy (RA) is a technique used to ablate calcified plaques. There is speculation that operators' experience with RA could play a role in the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From December 2015 to April 2020, patients with calcified coronary lesions requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with RA were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter, observational registry. The patients were divided into two groups based on the number of RAs performed by their operator in the past. A propensity score matching was done for a sensitivity analysis. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 497 patients were enrolled in the study. The calculated cutoff number of RA-PCI between the two groups was 82 cases. The more experienced group underwent PCI with less fluoroscopy time (less experienced vs. more experienced, 38.8 vs. 30.0 minutes, p<0.001), and more frequent intravascular imaging (54.6% vs. 69.0%, p=0.012). The primary outcome did not differ significantly between the groups (5.2% vs. 7.3%, hazard ratio, 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-3.74; p=0.433). No significant difference in the incidence of complications was observed between the groups (5.5% vs. 7.0%, odds ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.57-3.04; p=0.526). Similar results were observed in the propensity-score matched population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In PCI using RA for calcified lesions, the composite outcome of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization at 1 year was not significantly different according to RA experience among operators.</p>","PeriodicalId":17850,"journal":{"name":"Korean Circulation Journal","volume":" ","pages":"672-684"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314066/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Operator Experience Performing Rotational Atherectomy on Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Woochan Kwon, Ki Hong Choi, Young Bin Song, Joo Myung Lee, Taek Kyu Park, Jeong Hoon Yang, Joo-Yong Hahn, Seung-Hyuk Choi, Jae-Hwan Lee, Min Chul Kim, Hyun-Jong Lee, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon\",\"doi\":\"10.4070/kcj.2024.0318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Rotational atherectomy (RA) is a technique used to ablate calcified plaques. There is speculation that operators' experience with RA could play a role in the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From December 2015 to April 2020, patients with calcified coronary lesions requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with RA were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter, observational registry. The patients were divided into two groups based on the number of RAs performed by their operator in the past. A propensity score matching was done for a sensitivity analysis. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 497 patients were enrolled in the study. The calculated cutoff number of RA-PCI between the two groups was 82 cases. The more experienced group underwent PCI with less fluoroscopy time (less experienced vs. more experienced, 38.8 vs. 30.0 minutes, p<0.001), and more frequent intravascular imaging (54.6% vs. 69.0%, p=0.012). The primary outcome did not differ significantly between the groups (5.2% vs. 7.3%, hazard ratio, 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-3.74; p=0.433). No significant difference in the incidence of complications was observed between the groups (5.5% vs. 7.0%, odds ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.57-3.04; p=0.526). Similar results were observed in the propensity-score matched population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In PCI using RA for calcified lesions, the composite outcome of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization at 1 year was not significantly different according to RA experience among operators.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Circulation Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"672-684\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314066/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Circulation Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2024.0318\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Circulation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2024.0318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:旋转动脉粥样硬化切除术(RA)是一种用于消融钙化斑块的技术。有人猜测,运营商在RA方面的经验可能在结果中发挥作用。方法:从2015年12月到2020年4月,对需要经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的钙化冠状动脉病变合并RA患者进行前瞻性、多中心、观察性登记。根据操作者过去进行的RAs手术次数将患者分为两组。对敏感性分析进行倾向评分匹配。主要终点是心脏性死亡、心肌梗死和1年靶血管重建术的综合结果。结果:共纳入497例患者。计算两组间RA-PCI的截止次数为82例。经验更丰富的组行PCI,透视时间更短(经验更丰富的组38.8分钟对30.0分钟,经验更丰富的组38.8分钟对30.0分钟)。结论:在使用RA治疗钙化病变的PCI中,1年心脏死亡、心肌梗死和靶血管重建术的综合结局根据操作者的RA经验无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of Operator Experience Performing Rotational Atherectomy on Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Effect of Operator Experience Performing Rotational Atherectomy on Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Effect of Operator Experience Performing Rotational Atherectomy on Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Effect of Operator Experience Performing Rotational Atherectomy on Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Background and objectives: Rotational atherectomy (RA) is a technique used to ablate calcified plaques. There is speculation that operators' experience with RA could play a role in the outcomes.

Methods: From December 2015 to April 2020, patients with calcified coronary lesions requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with RA were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter, observational registry. The patients were divided into two groups based on the number of RAs performed by their operator in the past. A propensity score matching was done for a sensitivity analysis. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization at 1 year.

Results: A total of 497 patients were enrolled in the study. The calculated cutoff number of RA-PCI between the two groups was 82 cases. The more experienced group underwent PCI with less fluoroscopy time (less experienced vs. more experienced, 38.8 vs. 30.0 minutes, p<0.001), and more frequent intravascular imaging (54.6% vs. 69.0%, p=0.012). The primary outcome did not differ significantly between the groups (5.2% vs. 7.3%, hazard ratio, 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-3.74; p=0.433). No significant difference in the incidence of complications was observed between the groups (5.5% vs. 7.0%, odds ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.57-3.04; p=0.526). Similar results were observed in the propensity-score matched population.

Conclusions: In PCI using RA for calcified lesions, the composite outcome of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization at 1 year was not significantly different according to RA experience among operators.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Circulation Journal
Korean Circulation Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
17.20%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Korean Circulation Journal is the official journal of the Korean Society of Cardiology, the Korean Pediatric Heart Society, the Korean Society of Interventional Cardiology, and the Korean Society of Heart Failure. Abbreviated title is ''Korean Circ J''. Korean Circulation Journal, established in 1971, is a professional, peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including original articles of basic research and clinical findings, review articles, editorials, images in cardiovascular medicine, and letters to the editor. Korean Circulation Journal is published monthly in English and publishes scientific and state-of-the-art clinical articles aimed at improving human health in general and contributing to the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular diseases in particular. The journal is published on the official website (https://e-kcj.org). It is indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE, Web of Science), Scopus, EMBASE, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Google Scholar, KoreaMed, KoreaMed Synapse and KoMCI, and easily available to wide international researchers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信