Yuan Gao, Meiting Huang, Wenjing Song, Yingsi Li, Xiaoming Yan
{"title":"眼睑湿性上皮病:干眼诊断的早期征兆。","authors":"Yuan Gao, Meiting Huang, Wenjing Song, Yingsi Li, Xiaoming Yan","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1593430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the severity of lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) and ocular surface features and evaluate the potential of LWE as an early diagnosis indicator of dry eye.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-eight patients diagnosed with dry eye by TFOS DEWS II were divided into two groups based on the Korb grading: the mild group and the moderate-severe group. Ocular assessments included examination of LWE, tear-film lipid layer thickness (LLT) measurement, partial blinking rate (PBR) calculation, fluorescein tear breakup time (FTBUT) measurement, determining corneal fluorescein staining score, eyelid margin score, and meiboscore.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In patients with upper LWE, the PBR and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score were higher and LLT was lower in the moderate-severe LWE group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In patients with lower LWE, the PBR and lower eyelid margin score were significantly higher in the moderate-severe LWE group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The upper LWE staining score was moderately and significantly associated with the lower LWE staining score. Compared with LWE, if the FTBUT was used as the diagnostic indicator according to TFOS DEWS II, China, or ADES, the missed diagnosis rate fluctuated from 5.7 to 54.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The severity of LWE is related to dry eye indicators such as the PBR, FTBUT, eyelid margin score, OSDI, and meiboscore. Both upper and lower LWE can be used as diagnostic criteria for dry eye. Moreover, compared with FTBUT, LWE is more suitable as an early sign of dry eye diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1593430"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12176731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lid wiper epitheliopathy: an early sign of dry eye diagnosis.\",\"authors\":\"Yuan Gao, Meiting Huang, Wenjing Song, Yingsi Li, Xiaoming Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmed.2025.1593430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the severity of lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) and ocular surface features and evaluate the potential of LWE as an early diagnosis indicator of dry eye.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-eight patients diagnosed with dry eye by TFOS DEWS II were divided into two groups based on the Korb grading: the mild group and the moderate-severe group. Ocular assessments included examination of LWE, tear-film lipid layer thickness (LLT) measurement, partial blinking rate (PBR) calculation, fluorescein tear breakup time (FTBUT) measurement, determining corneal fluorescein staining score, eyelid margin score, and meiboscore.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In patients with upper LWE, the PBR and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score were higher and LLT was lower in the moderate-severe LWE group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In patients with lower LWE, the PBR and lower eyelid margin score were significantly higher in the moderate-severe LWE group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The upper LWE staining score was moderately and significantly associated with the lower LWE staining score. Compared with LWE, if the FTBUT was used as the diagnostic indicator according to TFOS DEWS II, China, or ADES, the missed diagnosis rate fluctuated from 5.7 to 54.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The severity of LWE is related to dry eye indicators such as the PBR, FTBUT, eyelid margin score, OSDI, and meiboscore. Both upper and lower LWE can be used as diagnostic criteria for dry eye. Moreover, compared with FTBUT, LWE is more suitable as an early sign of dry eye diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1593430\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12176731/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1593430\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1593430","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究的目的是探讨眼睑湿性上皮病(LWE)的严重程度与眼表特征之间的关系,并评估LWE作为干眼症早期诊断指标的潜力。方法:88例经TFOS DEWS II诊断为干眼症的患者,根据Korb评分分为轻度组和中重度组。眼部评估包括LWE检查、泪膜脂质层厚度(LLT)测量、部分眨眼率(PBR)计算、荧光素撕裂时间(FTBUT)测量、角膜荧光素染色评分、眼睑边缘评分和meiboscore。结果:上LWE患者中,中重度LWE组PBR、眼表疾病指数(OSDI)评分较高,LLT评分较低(p p )。结论:LWE的严重程度与PBR、FTBUT、睑缘评分、OSDI、meiboscore等干眼指标有关。上下LWE均可作为干眼症的诊断标准。此外,与FTBUT相比,LWE更适合作为干眼诊断的早期征兆。
Lid wiper epitheliopathy: an early sign of dry eye diagnosis.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the severity of lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) and ocular surface features and evaluate the potential of LWE as an early diagnosis indicator of dry eye.
Methods: Eighty-eight patients diagnosed with dry eye by TFOS DEWS II were divided into two groups based on the Korb grading: the mild group and the moderate-severe group. Ocular assessments included examination of LWE, tear-film lipid layer thickness (LLT) measurement, partial blinking rate (PBR) calculation, fluorescein tear breakup time (FTBUT) measurement, determining corneal fluorescein staining score, eyelid margin score, and meiboscore.
Results: In patients with upper LWE, the PBR and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score were higher and LLT was lower in the moderate-severe LWE group (p < 0.05). In patients with lower LWE, the PBR and lower eyelid margin score were significantly higher in the moderate-severe LWE group (p < 0.05). The upper LWE staining score was moderately and significantly associated with the lower LWE staining score. Compared with LWE, if the FTBUT was used as the diagnostic indicator according to TFOS DEWS II, China, or ADES, the missed diagnosis rate fluctuated from 5.7 to 54.5%.
Conclusion: The severity of LWE is related to dry eye indicators such as the PBR, FTBUT, eyelid margin score, OSDI, and meiboscore. Both upper and lower LWE can be used as diagnostic criteria for dry eye. Moreover, compared with FTBUT, LWE is more suitable as an early sign of dry eye diagnosis.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate
- the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions
- the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines
- the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities
- access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide
- addressing the grand health challenges around the world