角膜交联后感染性角膜炎:回顾性病例系列。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Bjarne Løberg Thorbjørnsen, Marthe Andrea Velle-Skretteberg, Andreas Thorsrud, Marit Sæthre, Atle Østern, Liv Drolsum, Olav Kristianslund
{"title":"角膜交联后感染性角膜炎:回顾性病例系列。","authors":"Bjarne Løberg Thorbjørnsen, Marthe Andrea Velle-Skretteberg, Andreas Thorsrud, Marit Sæthre, Atle Østern, Liv Drolsum, Olav Kristianslund","doi":"10.1097/ICO.0000000000003910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the risk of infectious keratitis after corneal cross-linking (CXL) in eyes with corneal ectasia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective case series, we reviewed the medical records of patients with a diagnosis code for keratitis over a 6-month period after all CXLs performed in the Department of Ophthalmology at Oslo University Hospital from 2007 to 2020. To compare our results with existing literature, we reviewed studies evaluating the risk of keratitis after CXL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1809 CXLs were performed in our department during the study period. The annual number of CXLs increased from 3 in 2007 to 219 in 2020. We identified 11 (0.6%) cases registered with a keratitis code within 6 months after CXL, of which the physician considered 5 (0.3%, 95% confidence interval, 0.1%-0.6%) to be procedure-related infectious keratitis. The microbiological agents were Staphylococcus aureus (n = 3), Acanthamoeba (n = 1), or unknown (n = 1). To our knowledge, this is the largest European study to report the risk of infectious keratitis after CXL. The literature review, including papers published up to October 2024, identified 23 relevant studies that reported infectious keratitis in 0% to 2.6% of eyes after CXL treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a low incidence of infectious keratitis after CXL. Our rate was comparable to that reported in the literature, indicating a low risk of this complication in eyes with corneal ectasia treated with CXL.</p>","PeriodicalId":10710,"journal":{"name":"Cornea","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infectious Keratitis After Corneal Cross-Linking: A Retrospective Case Series.\",\"authors\":\"Bjarne Løberg Thorbjørnsen, Marthe Andrea Velle-Skretteberg, Andreas Thorsrud, Marit Sæthre, Atle Østern, Liv Drolsum, Olav Kristianslund\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ICO.0000000000003910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the risk of infectious keratitis after corneal cross-linking (CXL) in eyes with corneal ectasia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective case series, we reviewed the medical records of patients with a diagnosis code for keratitis over a 6-month period after all CXLs performed in the Department of Ophthalmology at Oslo University Hospital from 2007 to 2020. To compare our results with existing literature, we reviewed studies evaluating the risk of keratitis after CXL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1809 CXLs were performed in our department during the study period. The annual number of CXLs increased from 3 in 2007 to 219 in 2020. We identified 11 (0.6%) cases registered with a keratitis code within 6 months after CXL, of which the physician considered 5 (0.3%, 95% confidence interval, 0.1%-0.6%) to be procedure-related infectious keratitis. The microbiological agents were Staphylococcus aureus (n = 3), Acanthamoeba (n = 1), or unknown (n = 1). To our knowledge, this is the largest European study to report the risk of infectious keratitis after CXL. The literature review, including papers published up to October 2024, identified 23 relevant studies that reported infectious keratitis in 0% to 2.6% of eyes after CXL treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a low incidence of infectious keratitis after CXL. Our rate was comparable to that reported in the literature, indicating a low risk of this complication in eyes with corneal ectasia treated with CXL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cornea\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cornea\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003910\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornea","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003910","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价角膜扩张患者角膜交联术后感染性角膜炎的发生风险。方法:在这个回顾性病例系列中,我们回顾了2007年至2020年在奥斯陆大学医院眼科进行的所有cxl后6个月内诊断为角膜炎的患者的医疗记录。为了将我们的结果与现有文献进行比较,我们回顾了评估CXL术后角膜炎风险的研究。结果:我科在研究期间共行cxl 1809例。cxl的年数量从2007年的3个增加到2020年的219个。我们确定了11例(0.6%)在CXL术后6个月内以角膜炎代码登记的病例,其中医生认为5例(0.3%,95%置信区间,0.1%-0.6%)为手术相关的感染性角膜炎。微生物制剂为金黄色葡萄球菌(n = 3)、棘阿米巴(n = 1)和未知(n = 1)。据我们所知,这是欧洲最大的报告CXL术后感染性角膜炎风险的研究。文献综述,包括截至2024年10月发表的论文,确定了23项相关研究,报告了0%至2.6%的眼睛在CXL治疗后发生感染性角膜炎。结论:我们发现CXL术后感染性角膜炎的发生率较低。我们的发生率与文献报道的发生率相当,表明角膜扩张接受CXL治疗的眼睛发生这种并发症的风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Infectious Keratitis After Corneal Cross-Linking: A Retrospective Case Series.

Purpose: To evaluate the risk of infectious keratitis after corneal cross-linking (CXL) in eyes with corneal ectasia.

Methods: In this retrospective case series, we reviewed the medical records of patients with a diagnosis code for keratitis over a 6-month period after all CXLs performed in the Department of Ophthalmology at Oslo University Hospital from 2007 to 2020. To compare our results with existing literature, we reviewed studies evaluating the risk of keratitis after CXL.

Results: A total of 1809 CXLs were performed in our department during the study period. The annual number of CXLs increased from 3 in 2007 to 219 in 2020. We identified 11 (0.6%) cases registered with a keratitis code within 6 months after CXL, of which the physician considered 5 (0.3%, 95% confidence interval, 0.1%-0.6%) to be procedure-related infectious keratitis. The microbiological agents were Staphylococcus aureus (n = 3), Acanthamoeba (n = 1), or unknown (n = 1). To our knowledge, this is the largest European study to report the risk of infectious keratitis after CXL. The literature review, including papers published up to October 2024, identified 23 relevant studies that reported infectious keratitis in 0% to 2.6% of eyes after CXL treatment.

Conclusions: We found a low incidence of infectious keratitis after CXL. Our rate was comparable to that reported in the literature, indicating a low risk of this complication in eyes with corneal ectasia treated with CXL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cornea
Cornea 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
354
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: For corneal specialists and for all general ophthalmologists with an interest in this exciting subspecialty, Cornea brings together the latest clinical and basic research on the cornea and the anterior segment of the eye. Each volume is peer-reviewed by Cornea''s board of world-renowned experts and fully indexed in archival format. Your subscription brings you the latest developments in your field and a growing library of valuable professional references. Sponsored by The Cornea Society which was founded as the Castroviejo Cornea Society in 1975.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信