Refika Genç Koyucu, Fatma Ketenci Gencer, Sema Rumeysa Bilici
{"title":"人工会阴保护和推动技术在分娩第二阶段对会阴结局的影响:一项组合策略的随机对照试验。","authors":"Refika Genç Koyucu, Fatma Ketenci Gencer, Sema Rumeysa Bilici","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07564-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Manual perineal protection and pushing techniques can impact the incidence of perineal trauma. Limited data exist on the impact of combinations of management strategies employed during the second stage of labor on perineal outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the combined impact of interventional and relatively more spontaneous techniques employed during the second stage of labor on perineal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This randomized controlled study was carried out in the maternity clinic of a state hospital. Low-risk, term nulliparous women with vertex presentation upon admission to the delivery unit were included in the study. The participants in the study were randomly assigned to either the hands-on perineal protection and directed pushing group or the hands-poised perineal protection and coached pushing group at the onset of the second stage of labor. The frequencies of episiotomy and perineal injury were the primary outcomes of the study. The secondary outcomes included maternal satisfaction, breastfeeding, Apgar scores, perineal muscle function and perineal pain scores, and the amount of postpartum hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The frequency of episiotomy was significantly lower in the hands-poised-undirected pushing group than in the hands-on-coached pushing group (RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.44-0.98, P = 0.04). The frequency of first-degree perineal injury was significantly greater in the hands-poised - undirected pushing group than in the hands-on-directed pushing group (RR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.06-3.90, P = 0.02). The frequencies of second-degree and higher perineal injuries were similar between the groups. No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Second-stage management strategies with fewer interventions can be used to reduce the frequency of episiotomy. Both hands-on directed pushing and hands-poised undirected pushing combinations for second-stage management exhibit similar frequencies of intact perineum.</p><p><strong>Trial and protocol registration: </strong>Clinical Trials; ID: NCT04823598; Date: 25.03.2021; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04823598 .</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"671"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12180208/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of manual perineal protection and pushing techniques used in the second stage of labor on perineal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial of combinations of strategies.\",\"authors\":\"Refika Genç Koyucu, Fatma Ketenci Gencer, Sema Rumeysa Bilici\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12884-025-07564-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Manual perineal protection and pushing techniques can impact the incidence of perineal trauma. Limited data exist on the impact of combinations of management strategies employed during the second stage of labor on perineal outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the combined impact of interventional and relatively more spontaneous techniques employed during the second stage of labor on perineal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This randomized controlled study was carried out in the maternity clinic of a state hospital. Low-risk, term nulliparous women with vertex presentation upon admission to the delivery unit were included in the study. The participants in the study were randomly assigned to either the hands-on perineal protection and directed pushing group or the hands-poised perineal protection and coached pushing group at the onset of the second stage of labor. The frequencies of episiotomy and perineal injury were the primary outcomes of the study. The secondary outcomes included maternal satisfaction, breastfeeding, Apgar scores, perineal muscle function and perineal pain scores, and the amount of postpartum hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The frequency of episiotomy was significantly lower in the hands-poised-undirected pushing group than in the hands-on-coached pushing group (RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.44-0.98, P = 0.04). The frequency of first-degree perineal injury was significantly greater in the hands-poised - undirected pushing group than in the hands-on-directed pushing group (RR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.06-3.90, P = 0.02). The frequencies of second-degree and higher perineal injuries were similar between the groups. No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Second-stage management strategies with fewer interventions can be used to reduce the frequency of episiotomy. Both hands-on directed pushing and hands-poised undirected pushing combinations for second-stage management exhibit similar frequencies of intact perineum.</p><p><strong>Trial and protocol registration: </strong>Clinical Trials; ID: NCT04823598; Date: 25.03.2021; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04823598 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"671\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12180208/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07564-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07564-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:手部会阴保护和推术会影响会阴创伤的发生率。有限的数据存在的影响,在第二阶段采用的管理策略对会阴结局的组合。本研究的目的是评估在分娩第二阶段采用介入性和相对更自发的技术对会阴结局的综合影响。材料与方法:随机对照研究在某国立医院妇产科进行。低风险,足月无产妇女入院时出现顶点包括在研究中。该研究的参与者在分娩第二阶段开始时被随机分配到手把手的会阴保护和直接推压组或手平衡的会阴保护和指导推压组。会阴切开术和会阴损伤的频率是研究的主要结果。次要结局包括产妇满意度、母乳喂养、Apgar评分、会阴肌肉功能和会阴疼痛评分、产后出血量。结果:徒手无方向推术组会阴切开术频次明显低于徒手有指导推术组(RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.44 ~ 0.98, P = 0.04)。会阴部一级损伤发生频率,手摆-无方向推压组明显高于手握-有方向推压组(RR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.06 ~ 3.90, P = 0.02)。二度及以上会阴损伤发生率组间相似。在次要结局方面,两组间未观察到显著差异。结论:采用较少干预的第二阶段治疗策略可以减少外阴切开术的频率。在第二阶段的治疗中,手握式直接推法和手握式非定向推法组合均表现出相似的会阴完整频率。试验和方案注册:临床试验;ID: NCT04823598;日期:25.03.2021;网址:https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04823598。
Effects of manual perineal protection and pushing techniques used in the second stage of labor on perineal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial of combinations of strategies.
Background: Manual perineal protection and pushing techniques can impact the incidence of perineal trauma. Limited data exist on the impact of combinations of management strategies employed during the second stage of labor on perineal outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the combined impact of interventional and relatively more spontaneous techniques employed during the second stage of labor on perineal outcomes.
Materials and methods: This randomized controlled study was carried out in the maternity clinic of a state hospital. Low-risk, term nulliparous women with vertex presentation upon admission to the delivery unit were included in the study. The participants in the study were randomly assigned to either the hands-on perineal protection and directed pushing group or the hands-poised perineal protection and coached pushing group at the onset of the second stage of labor. The frequencies of episiotomy and perineal injury were the primary outcomes of the study. The secondary outcomes included maternal satisfaction, breastfeeding, Apgar scores, perineal muscle function and perineal pain scores, and the amount of postpartum hemorrhage.
Results: The frequency of episiotomy was significantly lower in the hands-poised-undirected pushing group than in the hands-on-coached pushing group (RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.44-0.98, P = 0.04). The frequency of first-degree perineal injury was significantly greater in the hands-poised - undirected pushing group than in the hands-on-directed pushing group (RR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.06-3.90, P = 0.02). The frequencies of second-degree and higher perineal injuries were similar between the groups. No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of secondary outcomes.
Conclusions: Second-stage management strategies with fewer interventions can be used to reduce the frequency of episiotomy. Both hands-on directed pushing and hands-poised undirected pushing combinations for second-stage management exhibit similar frequencies of intact perineum.
期刊介绍:
BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.