精神卫生保健机构作为跨专业教育的临床暴露点:一项质性研究。

Q4 Medicine
Acta Medica Philippina Pub Date : 2025-05-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.47895/amp.vi0.9523
Evangeline Bascara Dela Fuente
{"title":"精神卫生保健机构作为跨专业教育的临床暴露点:一项质性研究。","authors":"Evangeline Bascara Dela Fuente","doi":"10.47895/amp.vi0.9523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interprofessional collaboration is required as a learning outcome for medical school graduates. Clinical exposure to collaborative practice is one of the recommended strategies in the implementation of interprofessional education. Professionals in mental health units customarily engage in collaborative practice and can provide learning opportunities for medical students. Local data on interprofessional collaboration among practitioners in a mental health care setting in the pandemic is limited and merits study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The goal of this study was to determine and then describe factors that influence collaborative practice among health professionals in an inpatient mental health care unit in the pandemic. It aimed to generate recommendations from practitioners on strategies to optimize opportunities for medical students to learn interprofessional collaboration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a qualitative study which made use of key informant interviews (KIIs) and focused group discussions (FGDs) with members of a multiprofessional mental health team in the mental health unit of a tertiary medical center. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic had drastically disrupted health care services and opportunities for interprofessional collaboration. Participants described their roles and identified six factors essential to reenergizing collaborative practice: resources and opportunities for meaningful interaction, quality of relationship and communication among team members, management goals and strategies relevant to the mental health needs and the context of patients and their families, guidelines for collaboration, interprofessional education appropriate to participant levels, and monitoring for quality assurance and improvement. Practical guidelines for promoting the identified factors were outlined. Recommendations to optimize opportunities for interprofessional education were also given.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Six factors were identified and described in the study. These can provide practitioners and students with a frame of reference for participating in and learning from collaborative practice in a mental health care unit as they work with other professionals on a shared concern. Addressing practical issues in real life settings will enhance their capacity to meaningfully collaborate with other professionals in managing patients, institutions, projects, and similar situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":6994,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Philippina","volume":"59 6","pages":"110-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Mental Health Care Setting as a Clinical Exposure Site for Interprofessional Education: a Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Evangeline Bascara Dela Fuente\",\"doi\":\"10.47895/amp.vi0.9523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interprofessional collaboration is required as a learning outcome for medical school graduates. Clinical exposure to collaborative practice is one of the recommended strategies in the implementation of interprofessional education. Professionals in mental health units customarily engage in collaborative practice and can provide learning opportunities for medical students. Local data on interprofessional collaboration among practitioners in a mental health care setting in the pandemic is limited and merits study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The goal of this study was to determine and then describe factors that influence collaborative practice among health professionals in an inpatient mental health care unit in the pandemic. It aimed to generate recommendations from practitioners on strategies to optimize opportunities for medical students to learn interprofessional collaboration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a qualitative study which made use of key informant interviews (KIIs) and focused group discussions (FGDs) with members of a multiprofessional mental health team in the mental health unit of a tertiary medical center. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic had drastically disrupted health care services and opportunities for interprofessional collaboration. Participants described their roles and identified six factors essential to reenergizing collaborative practice: resources and opportunities for meaningful interaction, quality of relationship and communication among team members, management goals and strategies relevant to the mental health needs and the context of patients and their families, guidelines for collaboration, interprofessional education appropriate to participant levels, and monitoring for quality assurance and improvement. Practical guidelines for promoting the identified factors were outlined. Recommendations to optimize opportunities for interprofessional education were also given.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Six factors were identified and described in the study. These can provide practitioners and students with a frame of reference for participating in and learning from collaborative practice in a mental health care unit as they work with other professionals on a shared concern. Addressing practical issues in real life settings will enhance their capacity to meaningfully collaborate with other professionals in managing patients, institutions, projects, and similar situations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Medica Philippina\",\"volume\":\"59 6\",\"pages\":\"110-119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174644/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Medica Philippina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.vi0.9523\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Philippina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.vi0.9523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:作为医学院毕业生的学习成果,跨专业合作是必需的。临床接触合作实践是实施跨专业教育的推荐策略之一。精神卫生单位的专业人员通常参与合作实践,可以为医科学生提供学习机会。关于大流行期间精神卫生保健机构从业人员跨专业合作的当地数据有限,值得研究。目的:本研究的目的是确定并描述影响流行病期间住院精神卫生保健单位卫生专业人员合作实践的因素。它的目的是让从业人员就优化医学生学习跨专业协作机会的战略提出建议。方法:这是一项定性研究,利用关键信息提供者访谈(KIIs)和重点小组讨论(fgd),与三级医疗中心精神卫生部门的多专业精神卫生小组成员进行讨论。数据采用专题分析进行分析。结果:COVID-19大流行的爆发严重扰乱了卫生保健服务和跨专业合作的机会。参与者描述了他们的角色,并确定了重新激活协作实践的六个必要因素:有意义的互动的资源和机会、团队成员之间关系和沟通的质量、与精神健康需求和患者及其家庭背景相关的管理目标和战略、协作指南、适合参与者水平的跨专业教育,以及质量保证和改进的监测。概述了促进已查明因素的实用准则。还提出了优化跨专业教育机会的建议。结论:本研究确定并描述了六个因素。这些可以为从业人员和学生提供一个参考框架,以便他们在与其他专业人员就共同关注的问题进行合作时,参与精神卫生保健单位的协作实践并从中学习。解决现实生活中的实际问题将提高他们在管理患者、机构、项目和类似情况下与其他专业人员进行有意义合作的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Mental Health Care Setting as a Clinical Exposure Site for Interprofessional Education: a Qualitative Study.

A Mental Health Care Setting as a Clinical Exposure Site for Interprofessional Education: a Qualitative Study.

A Mental Health Care Setting as a Clinical Exposure Site for Interprofessional Education: a Qualitative Study.

Background: Interprofessional collaboration is required as a learning outcome for medical school graduates. Clinical exposure to collaborative practice is one of the recommended strategies in the implementation of interprofessional education. Professionals in mental health units customarily engage in collaborative practice and can provide learning opportunities for medical students. Local data on interprofessional collaboration among practitioners in a mental health care setting in the pandemic is limited and merits study.

Objectives: The goal of this study was to determine and then describe factors that influence collaborative practice among health professionals in an inpatient mental health care unit in the pandemic. It aimed to generate recommendations from practitioners on strategies to optimize opportunities for medical students to learn interprofessional collaboration.

Methods: This is a qualitative study which made use of key informant interviews (KIIs) and focused group discussions (FGDs) with members of a multiprofessional mental health team in the mental health unit of a tertiary medical center. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic had drastically disrupted health care services and opportunities for interprofessional collaboration. Participants described their roles and identified six factors essential to reenergizing collaborative practice: resources and opportunities for meaningful interaction, quality of relationship and communication among team members, management goals and strategies relevant to the mental health needs and the context of patients and their families, guidelines for collaboration, interprofessional education appropriate to participant levels, and monitoring for quality assurance and improvement. Practical guidelines for promoting the identified factors were outlined. Recommendations to optimize opportunities for interprofessional education were also given.

Conclusion: Six factors were identified and described in the study. These can provide practitioners and students with a frame of reference for participating in and learning from collaborative practice in a mental health care unit as they work with other professionals on a shared concern. Addressing practical issues in real life settings will enhance their capacity to meaningfully collaborate with other professionals in managing patients, institutions, projects, and similar situations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Medica Philippina
Acta Medica Philippina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信