{"title":"解除地域差异:从采用者到公众推动灵活能源实践——挪威的案例","authors":"Yechennan Peng , Christian A. Klöckner","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Flexible energy management solutions have been proven to enhance energy supply security and optimise consumption. Despite their technical efficacy of these solutions, user acceptance remains a subject of ongoing debate. However, research into the spatial variation of the factors that influence adoption rates is still in its infancy. This study scaled up individual-level household survey data from Norway to investigate how the factors that influence household adoption of flexible energy use vary at the municipal level, between highly and less centralised municipalities, and between regions with different electricity prices. Our findings reveal several key insights: First, despite substantial differences in electricity prices, these differences do not significantly account for the variation in the adoption rate of flexible energy practices. Second, the primary drivers of adoption differ considerably between highly centralised and less centralised municipalities. Centrality here denotes a municipality's integration into urban networks, reflected by access to infrastructure, services, and population density. Wealth remains a significant factor in both contexts. Living in multi-family houses promotes flexible energy use in highly centralised municipalities, but hinders it in less centralised areas. In addition, dwelling age and electricity tariffs vary markedly with centralisation. Closing the gap in psychological variables, such as attitudes, social norms, self-efficacy, and motivation, between adopters and the public is crucial for expanding adoption. These insights emphasise the importance of context-specific policies and address specific challenges, in order to effectively enhance the adoption of flexible energy solutions in less centralised municipalities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104179"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unlocking geographic differences: from adopters to the public in driving the uptake of flexible energy practices—the case of Norway\",\"authors\":\"Yechennan Peng , Christian A. Klöckner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Flexible energy management solutions have been proven to enhance energy supply security and optimise consumption. Despite their technical efficacy of these solutions, user acceptance remains a subject of ongoing debate. However, research into the spatial variation of the factors that influence adoption rates is still in its infancy. This study scaled up individual-level household survey data from Norway to investigate how the factors that influence household adoption of flexible energy use vary at the municipal level, between highly and less centralised municipalities, and between regions with different electricity prices. Our findings reveal several key insights: First, despite substantial differences in electricity prices, these differences do not significantly account for the variation in the adoption rate of flexible energy practices. Second, the primary drivers of adoption differ considerably between highly centralised and less centralised municipalities. Centrality here denotes a municipality's integration into urban networks, reflected by access to infrastructure, services, and population density. Wealth remains a significant factor in both contexts. Living in multi-family houses promotes flexible energy use in highly centralised municipalities, but hinders it in less centralised areas. In addition, dwelling age and electricity tariffs vary markedly with centralisation. Closing the gap in psychological variables, such as attitudes, social norms, self-efficacy, and motivation, between adopters and the public is crucial for expanding adoption. These insights emphasise the importance of context-specific policies and address specific challenges, in order to effectively enhance the adoption of flexible energy solutions in less centralised municipalities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002609\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002609","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Unlocking geographic differences: from adopters to the public in driving the uptake of flexible energy practices—the case of Norway
Flexible energy management solutions have been proven to enhance energy supply security and optimise consumption. Despite their technical efficacy of these solutions, user acceptance remains a subject of ongoing debate. However, research into the spatial variation of the factors that influence adoption rates is still in its infancy. This study scaled up individual-level household survey data from Norway to investigate how the factors that influence household adoption of flexible energy use vary at the municipal level, between highly and less centralised municipalities, and between regions with different electricity prices. Our findings reveal several key insights: First, despite substantial differences in electricity prices, these differences do not significantly account for the variation in the adoption rate of flexible energy practices. Second, the primary drivers of adoption differ considerably between highly centralised and less centralised municipalities. Centrality here denotes a municipality's integration into urban networks, reflected by access to infrastructure, services, and population density. Wealth remains a significant factor in both contexts. Living in multi-family houses promotes flexible energy use in highly centralised municipalities, but hinders it in less centralised areas. In addition, dwelling age and electricity tariffs vary markedly with centralisation. Closing the gap in psychological variables, such as attitudes, social norms, self-efficacy, and motivation, between adopters and the public is crucial for expanding adoption. These insights emphasise the importance of context-specific policies and address specific challenges, in order to effectively enhance the adoption of flexible energy solutions in less centralised municipalities.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.