迈向海上运输脱碳:船上碳捕获和储存与低碳替代燃料的比较

IF 3.9 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
Mohamed Ali Saafi , Michael Traver , Esam Hamad
{"title":"迈向海上运输脱碳:船上碳捕获和储存与低碳替代燃料的比较","authors":"Mohamed Ali Saafi ,&nbsp;Michael Traver ,&nbsp;Esam Hamad","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With both regional authorities and corporate entities declaring net-zero greenhouse gas ambitions over the last decade, the assessment and development of potential solutions has accelerated. One of the key sectors emitting around 25 % of energy-related greenhouse gases is transportation. Although some segments of the transportation sector have instituted concrete plans with strict regulatory requirements, the maritime sector faces significant challenges in decarbonization, driven by the limited availability of low-emission fuels and commercialized zero-emission vessels compared to its high energy demand. In this work, we develop the Mobility and Energy Transportation Analysis Model, a python-based optimization model to investigate the maritime sector’s current and projected energy demand and a technology sales forecast based on different scenarios, including the latest IMO aspirations to reach carbon neutrality by 2050 on a Well to Wake basis. Along with introducing lower carbon fuels as alternative refueling options for conventional vessels, we explore the market opportunities of mobile carbon capture (MCC), also referred to as Onboard Carbon Capture (OCC) through 2050. To accurately assess this technology, a techno-economic analysis is essential to determine marginal abatement costs compared to alternative decarbonization technologies. Considering consumer decision making as a key factor in shaping the future of marine vessels represents the novelty of our methodology. An additional novelty of this work comes from the detailed cost categories taken into consideration in the analysis, including intangible costs associated with MCC system cost components for different capture rates, as well as the total cost of owning each vessel technology. Based on the study results, MCC could be a viable alternative technology to decarbonize the marine fleet towards complying with IMO’s regulations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 101494"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards maritime transport decarbonization: Comparison of onboard carbon capture and storage to low carbon alternative fuels\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Ali Saafi ,&nbsp;Michael Traver ,&nbsp;Esam Hamad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>With both regional authorities and corporate entities declaring net-zero greenhouse gas ambitions over the last decade, the assessment and development of potential solutions has accelerated. One of the key sectors emitting around 25 % of energy-related greenhouse gases is transportation. Although some segments of the transportation sector have instituted concrete plans with strict regulatory requirements, the maritime sector faces significant challenges in decarbonization, driven by the limited availability of low-emission fuels and commercialized zero-emission vessels compared to its high energy demand. In this work, we develop the Mobility and Energy Transportation Analysis Model, a python-based optimization model to investigate the maritime sector’s current and projected energy demand and a technology sales forecast based on different scenarios, including the latest IMO aspirations to reach carbon neutrality by 2050 on a Well to Wake basis. Along with introducing lower carbon fuels as alternative refueling options for conventional vessels, we explore the market opportunities of mobile carbon capture (MCC), also referred to as Onboard Carbon Capture (OCC) through 2050. To accurately assess this technology, a techno-economic analysis is essential to determine marginal abatement costs compared to alternative decarbonization technologies. Considering consumer decision making as a key factor in shaping the future of marine vessels represents the novelty of our methodology. An additional novelty of this work comes from the detailed cost categories taken into consideration in the analysis, including intangible costs associated with MCC system cost components for different capture rates, as well as the total cost of owning each vessel technology. Based on the study results, MCC could be a viable alternative technology to decarbonize the marine fleet towards complying with IMO’s regulations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"32 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101494\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225001733\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225001733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着地区当局和企业实体在过去十年中宣布实现净零温室气体排放的目标,对潜在解决方案的评估和开发已经加快。交通运输是排放约25%的能源相关温室气体的关键部门之一。尽管运输部门的一些部门已经制定了具有严格监管要求的具体计划,但由于与高能源需求相比,低排放燃料和商业化零排放船舶的可用性有限,海事部门在脱碳方面面临重大挑战。在这项工作中,我们开发了流动性和能源运输分析模型,这是一个基于蟒蛇的优化模型,用于调查海事部门当前和预计的能源需求,以及基于不同情景的技术销售预测,包括国际海事组织最新的愿望,即到2050年在Well to Wake的基础上实现碳中和。随着引入低碳燃料作为传统船舶的替代燃料选择,我们探索到2050年移动碳捕集(MCC)的市场机会,也称为车载碳捕集(OCC)。为了准确评估这项技术,技术经济分析对于确定与其他脱碳技术相比的边际减排成本至关重要。考虑到消费者的决策是塑造船舶未来的关键因素,这代表了我们方法的新颖性。这项工作的另一个新颖之处来自于分析中考虑的详细成本类别,包括与不同捕获率的MCC系统成本组成部分相关的无形成本,以及拥有每艘船技术的总成本。根据研究结果,MCC可能是一种可行的替代技术,可以使海洋船队脱碳,从而遵守国际海事组织的规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards maritime transport decarbonization: Comparison of onboard carbon capture and storage to low carbon alternative fuels
With both regional authorities and corporate entities declaring net-zero greenhouse gas ambitions over the last decade, the assessment and development of potential solutions has accelerated. One of the key sectors emitting around 25 % of energy-related greenhouse gases is transportation. Although some segments of the transportation sector have instituted concrete plans with strict regulatory requirements, the maritime sector faces significant challenges in decarbonization, driven by the limited availability of low-emission fuels and commercialized zero-emission vessels compared to its high energy demand. In this work, we develop the Mobility and Energy Transportation Analysis Model, a python-based optimization model to investigate the maritime sector’s current and projected energy demand and a technology sales forecast based on different scenarios, including the latest IMO aspirations to reach carbon neutrality by 2050 on a Well to Wake basis. Along with introducing lower carbon fuels as alternative refueling options for conventional vessels, we explore the market opportunities of mobile carbon capture (MCC), also referred to as Onboard Carbon Capture (OCC) through 2050. To accurately assess this technology, a techno-economic analysis is essential to determine marginal abatement costs compared to alternative decarbonization technologies. Considering consumer decision making as a key factor in shaping the future of marine vessels represents the novelty of our methodology. An additional novelty of this work comes from the detailed cost categories taken into consideration in the analysis, including intangible costs associated with MCC system cost components for different capture rates, as well as the total cost of owning each vessel technology. Based on the study results, MCC could be a viable alternative technology to decarbonize the marine fleet towards complying with IMO’s regulations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信