{"title":"估算欧盟碳边界调整机制和中国报复性措施的隐含碳排放量和经济影响","authors":"Tetsuji Tanaka , Fumiya Nagashima","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) aims to prevent carbon leakage by imposing tariffs on imports of carbon-intensive products. While previous studies have analyzed CBAM's effects using computable general equilibrium (CGE) models, they have primarily focused on direct emissions or emissions related to electricity consumption. Few have comprehensively accounted for upstream indirect emissions or explored the potential economic impacts of retaliatory tariffs by affected countries. This study addresses these gaps by estimating the embodied carbon emissions associated with exports to the EU, including Scope 1, Scope 2, and indirect emissions excluding electricity, using a multi-regional input-output (MRIO) framework based on the GTAP database. A global CGE model is then employed to simulate the economic impacts of CBAM under various carbon price scenarios and to assess the effects of possible retaliatory tariffs by China. The results reveal that while CBAM effectively reduces carbon leakage, it imposes substantial economic burdens on exporting countries, particularly when indirect emissions are fully considered. Retaliatory tariffs by China further exacerbate these economic impacts, highlighting the risk of trade conflicts. These findings suggest that policymakers should design CBAM in a manner that accounts for embodied emissions while also considering cooperative mechanisms to mitigate potential trade tensions and ensure a fair and effective global climate policy framework.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"390 ","pages":"Article 126209"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating the embodied carbon emissions and economic impacts of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism and China's retaliatory measures\",\"authors\":\"Tetsuji Tanaka , Fumiya Nagashima\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) aims to prevent carbon leakage by imposing tariffs on imports of carbon-intensive products. While previous studies have analyzed CBAM's effects using computable general equilibrium (CGE) models, they have primarily focused on direct emissions or emissions related to electricity consumption. Few have comprehensively accounted for upstream indirect emissions or explored the potential economic impacts of retaliatory tariffs by affected countries. This study addresses these gaps by estimating the embodied carbon emissions associated with exports to the EU, including Scope 1, Scope 2, and indirect emissions excluding electricity, using a multi-regional input-output (MRIO) framework based on the GTAP database. A global CGE model is then employed to simulate the economic impacts of CBAM under various carbon price scenarios and to assess the effects of possible retaliatory tariffs by China. The results reveal that while CBAM effectively reduces carbon leakage, it imposes substantial economic burdens on exporting countries, particularly when indirect emissions are fully considered. Retaliatory tariffs by China further exacerbate these economic impacts, highlighting the risk of trade conflicts. These findings suggest that policymakers should design CBAM in a manner that accounts for embodied emissions while also considering cooperative mechanisms to mitigate potential trade tensions and ensure a fair and effective global climate policy framework.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"390 \",\"pages\":\"Article 126209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725021851\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725021851","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Estimating the embodied carbon emissions and economic impacts of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism and China's retaliatory measures
The European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) aims to prevent carbon leakage by imposing tariffs on imports of carbon-intensive products. While previous studies have analyzed CBAM's effects using computable general equilibrium (CGE) models, they have primarily focused on direct emissions or emissions related to electricity consumption. Few have comprehensively accounted for upstream indirect emissions or explored the potential economic impacts of retaliatory tariffs by affected countries. This study addresses these gaps by estimating the embodied carbon emissions associated with exports to the EU, including Scope 1, Scope 2, and indirect emissions excluding electricity, using a multi-regional input-output (MRIO) framework based on the GTAP database. A global CGE model is then employed to simulate the economic impacts of CBAM under various carbon price scenarios and to assess the effects of possible retaliatory tariffs by China. The results reveal that while CBAM effectively reduces carbon leakage, it imposes substantial economic burdens on exporting countries, particularly when indirect emissions are fully considered. Retaliatory tariffs by China further exacerbate these economic impacts, highlighting the risk of trade conflicts. These findings suggest that policymakers should design CBAM in a manner that accounts for embodied emissions while also considering cooperative mechanisms to mitigate potential trade tensions and ensure a fair and effective global climate policy framework.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.