Sila Cagri Isler,Fatma Soysal,Tugce Ceyhanli,Berrin Unsal,Jean-Claude Imber,Andrea Roccuzzo
{"title":"种植体周围重建治疗的长期治疗结果:一项随机临床试验的7年生存率和成功。","authors":"Sila Cagri Isler,Fatma Soysal,Tugce Ceyhanli,Berrin Unsal,Jean-Claude Imber,Andrea Roccuzzo","doi":"10.1111/clr.14466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\r\nTo report the 7-year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial evaluating a reconstructive surgical procedure of peri-implantitis with a bone substitute in combination with either concentrated growth factor (CGF) or collagen membrane (CM).\r\n\r\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\r\nThe original population consisted of 57 patients with at least one implant diagnosed with peri-implantitis exhibiting two-, three-, or four-wall intrabony defects ≥ 3 mm which were filled with a xenogenic bone grafting material and covered with either CGF or CM. Clinical and radiographic parameters, treatment success, and disease recurrence frequencies were evaluated over the 7-year follow-up period of supportive periodontal/peri-implant care. Relationships between prognostic indicators/predictors and treatment success and failure were investigated.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nSixteen patients (24 implants) (CGF group) and 18 (25 implants) (CM group) completed the 7-year follow-up. Although short-term improvements in clinical and radiographic outcomes were observed, a tendency toward relapse was detected through time. At implant level, CM group demonstrated significantly more favorable outcomes for deepest PPD and radiographic vertical defect depth (p = 0.040 and p = 0.043) compared to CGF group. At 7 years, treatment success was achieved in 23.1% of CGF and 30.8% of CM patients, while disease recurrence occurred in 34.6% and 30.8%, respectively (p > 0.05). The presence of baseline suppuration was the only significant patient-level predictor for treatment failure (OR = 15.45; 95% CI: 1.42-168.5; p = 0.02).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nBoth protocols led to comparable clinical and radiographic outcomes. Long-term treatment success was limited, with increasing failure rates over time. Baseline suppuration had a significant negative impact on treatment outcomes.","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Treatment Outcomes of Peri-Implantitis Reconstructive Therapy: 7-Year Survival and Success of a Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sila Cagri Isler,Fatma Soysal,Tugce Ceyhanli,Berrin Unsal,Jean-Claude Imber,Andrea Roccuzzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/clr.14466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVES\\r\\nTo report the 7-year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial evaluating a reconstructive surgical procedure of peri-implantitis with a bone substitute in combination with either concentrated growth factor (CGF) or collagen membrane (CM).\\r\\n\\r\\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\\r\\nThe original population consisted of 57 patients with at least one implant diagnosed with peri-implantitis exhibiting two-, three-, or four-wall intrabony defects ≥ 3 mm which were filled with a xenogenic bone grafting material and covered with either CGF or CM. Clinical and radiographic parameters, treatment success, and disease recurrence frequencies were evaluated over the 7-year follow-up period of supportive periodontal/peri-implant care. Relationships between prognostic indicators/predictors and treatment success and failure were investigated.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nSixteen patients (24 implants) (CGF group) and 18 (25 implants) (CM group) completed the 7-year follow-up. Although short-term improvements in clinical and radiographic outcomes were observed, a tendency toward relapse was detected through time. At implant level, CM group demonstrated significantly more favorable outcomes for deepest PPD and radiographic vertical defect depth (p = 0.040 and p = 0.043) compared to CGF group. At 7 years, treatment success was achieved in 23.1% of CGF and 30.8% of CM patients, while disease recurrence occurred in 34.6% and 30.8%, respectively (p > 0.05). The presence of baseline suppuration was the only significant patient-level predictor for treatment failure (OR = 15.45; 95% CI: 1.42-168.5; p = 0.02).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nBoth protocols led to comparable clinical and radiographic outcomes. Long-term treatment success was limited, with increasing failure rates over time. Baseline suppuration had a significant negative impact on treatment outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14466\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14466","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-Term Treatment Outcomes of Peri-Implantitis Reconstructive Therapy: 7-Year Survival and Success of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
OBJECTIVES
To report the 7-year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial evaluating a reconstructive surgical procedure of peri-implantitis with a bone substitute in combination with either concentrated growth factor (CGF) or collagen membrane (CM).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The original population consisted of 57 patients with at least one implant diagnosed with peri-implantitis exhibiting two-, three-, or four-wall intrabony defects ≥ 3 mm which were filled with a xenogenic bone grafting material and covered with either CGF or CM. Clinical and radiographic parameters, treatment success, and disease recurrence frequencies were evaluated over the 7-year follow-up period of supportive periodontal/peri-implant care. Relationships between prognostic indicators/predictors and treatment success and failure were investigated.
RESULTS
Sixteen patients (24 implants) (CGF group) and 18 (25 implants) (CM group) completed the 7-year follow-up. Although short-term improvements in clinical and radiographic outcomes were observed, a tendency toward relapse was detected through time. At implant level, CM group demonstrated significantly more favorable outcomes for deepest PPD and radiographic vertical defect depth (p = 0.040 and p = 0.043) compared to CGF group. At 7 years, treatment success was achieved in 23.1% of CGF and 30.8% of CM patients, while disease recurrence occurred in 34.6% and 30.8%, respectively (p > 0.05). The presence of baseline suppuration was the only significant patient-level predictor for treatment failure (OR = 15.45; 95% CI: 1.42-168.5; p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION
Both protocols led to comparable clinical and radiographic outcomes. Long-term treatment success was limited, with increasing failure rates over time. Baseline suppuration had a significant negative impact on treatment outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.