{"title":"揭示环境和人为驱动因素在塑造哺乳动物多样性全球格局中的作用","authors":"Carson P. Hedberg, Felisa A. Smith","doi":"10.1002/ecog.07674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patterns in functional and phylogenetic diversity reflect ecological and evolutionary relationships among taxa, and thus can offer key insights into the mechanisms underlying species distributions. However, disentangling the relative influence of proximate environmental drivers versus biogeographic evolutionary history can be a challenge. Moreover, human activities have enormously impacted the global distribution of mammals over the past millennia, potentially skewing our understanding of the underlying processes influencing biodiversity accumulation and community structure. Here, we investigated how the environment shapes global patterns in terrestrial mammal diversity, and how anthropogenic impacts have altered our understanding of these mechanisms. To distinguish aspects of mammal diversity most directly influenced by proximate environmental conditions, we employed novel metrics representing the deviation between functional and phylogenetic diversity. We calculated these residual functional diversity values using both current mammal distributions and estimated distributions in the absence of human impacts to characterize the effect of anthropogenic diversity loss. Each dataset was then modeled separately as a function of key environmental drivers and compared. We found remarkable variation in residual functional diversity across terrestrial communities, suggesting the environment strongly mediates the relationship between functional and phylogenetic diversity. Specifically, temperature seasonality and evapotranspiration play key roles in shaping global patterns in mammal functional diversity. Critically, the strength of these relationships is dampened by anthropogenic biodiversity loss, which has homogenized functional and phylogenetic community structure across environmental gradients. By disentangling the role of human impacts on both patterns and purported mechanisms of mammal diversity, our results provide a more accurate depiction of the fundamental relationships underlying mammal communities.","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"240 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unraveling the role of environmental and anthropogenic drivers in shaping global patterns in mammal diversity\",\"authors\":\"Carson P. Hedberg, Felisa A. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecog.07674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Patterns in functional and phylogenetic diversity reflect ecological and evolutionary relationships among taxa, and thus can offer key insights into the mechanisms underlying species distributions. However, disentangling the relative influence of proximate environmental drivers versus biogeographic evolutionary history can be a challenge. Moreover, human activities have enormously impacted the global distribution of mammals over the past millennia, potentially skewing our understanding of the underlying processes influencing biodiversity accumulation and community structure. Here, we investigated how the environment shapes global patterns in terrestrial mammal diversity, and how anthropogenic impacts have altered our understanding of these mechanisms. To distinguish aspects of mammal diversity most directly influenced by proximate environmental conditions, we employed novel metrics representing the deviation between functional and phylogenetic diversity. We calculated these residual functional diversity values using both current mammal distributions and estimated distributions in the absence of human impacts to characterize the effect of anthropogenic diversity loss. Each dataset was then modeled separately as a function of key environmental drivers and compared. We found remarkable variation in residual functional diversity across terrestrial communities, suggesting the environment strongly mediates the relationship between functional and phylogenetic diversity. Specifically, temperature seasonality and evapotranspiration play key roles in shaping global patterns in mammal functional diversity. Critically, the strength of these relationships is dampened by anthropogenic biodiversity loss, which has homogenized functional and phylogenetic community structure across environmental gradients. By disentangling the role of human impacts on both patterns and purported mechanisms of mammal diversity, our results provide a more accurate depiction of the fundamental relationships underlying mammal communities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecography\",\"volume\":\"240 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecog.07674\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecog.07674","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Unraveling the role of environmental and anthropogenic drivers in shaping global patterns in mammal diversity
Patterns in functional and phylogenetic diversity reflect ecological and evolutionary relationships among taxa, and thus can offer key insights into the mechanisms underlying species distributions. However, disentangling the relative influence of proximate environmental drivers versus biogeographic evolutionary history can be a challenge. Moreover, human activities have enormously impacted the global distribution of mammals over the past millennia, potentially skewing our understanding of the underlying processes influencing biodiversity accumulation and community structure. Here, we investigated how the environment shapes global patterns in terrestrial mammal diversity, and how anthropogenic impacts have altered our understanding of these mechanisms. To distinguish aspects of mammal diversity most directly influenced by proximate environmental conditions, we employed novel metrics representing the deviation between functional and phylogenetic diversity. We calculated these residual functional diversity values using both current mammal distributions and estimated distributions in the absence of human impacts to characterize the effect of anthropogenic diversity loss. Each dataset was then modeled separately as a function of key environmental drivers and compared. We found remarkable variation in residual functional diversity across terrestrial communities, suggesting the environment strongly mediates the relationship between functional and phylogenetic diversity. Specifically, temperature seasonality and evapotranspiration play key roles in shaping global patterns in mammal functional diversity. Critically, the strength of these relationships is dampened by anthropogenic biodiversity loss, which has homogenized functional and phylogenetic community structure across environmental gradients. By disentangling the role of human impacts on both patterns and purported mechanisms of mammal diversity, our results provide a more accurate depiction of the fundamental relationships underlying mammal communities.
期刊介绍:
ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem.
Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography.
Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.