Jussi Mäkinen, Laura Antão, Janne Heliölä, Mikko Kuussaari, Aleksi Lehikoinen, Ida‐Maria Huikkonen, Reima Leinonen, Juha Pöyry, Tomas Roslin
{"title":"社区变化的速度和驱动因素随时间和空间的变化而变化——这是一项国家生物监测计划的发现","authors":"Jussi Mäkinen, Laura Antão, Janne Heliölä, Mikko Kuussaari, Aleksi Lehikoinen, Ida‐Maria Huikkonen, Reima Leinonen, Juha Pöyry, Tomas Roslin","doi":"10.1002/ecog.07335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Habitat heterogeneity and demographic processes create variability in the major taxonomic diversity trends: 1) biotic homogenization and 2) the emergence of novel community compositions. Nonetheless, little is known about how the imprints of environmental filtering and random demographic processes on community dissimilarity vary over 1) time or 2) space. Quantifying such variation is key to revealing temporal regime shifts, latitudinal trends, and site‐level specificity in the drivers of community dissimilarity.To characterise variation in drivers of community change, we introduce the concept of ‘non‐stationary community responses'. We then apply this concept to estimate temporal and spatial variability in the imprints of climate, land cover and random processes on spatial and temporal dissimilarity of community composition. As a model system, we use multidecadal monitoring data of bird (1147 monitoring sites; 49 years), butterfly (101 monitoring sites; 22 years), and moth (99 monitoring sites; 26 years) communities across a 1200‐km latitudinal gradient in Finland.Regarding spatial dissimilarity, environmental filtering had a larger imprint than what random processes had. For butterflies and moths, environmental filtering shifted from being primarily associated with land cover to being primarily associated with climate indicating a likely regime shift along with warming climate. Regarding temporal dissimilarity of bird and butterfly communities, the imprints of environmental filtering and random processes varied between monitoring sites. A conventional stationary model was unable to track such site‐specific processes. The imprints did not change linearly along a latitudinal gradient.Our results demonstrate that accounting for non‐stationarity in community dynamics is needed to pinpoint temporal shifts and spatial variability in the drivers of community change. Should we assume that community change is driven by the same primary forces at all times and everywhere, then we will fail to detect the real local and contemporary drivers of change, and risk applying the wrong corrective measures.","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"147 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The pace and drivers of community change vary over space and time – findings from a national biomonitoring programme\",\"authors\":\"Jussi Mäkinen, Laura Antão, Janne Heliölä, Mikko Kuussaari, Aleksi Lehikoinen, Ida‐Maria Huikkonen, Reima Leinonen, Juha Pöyry, Tomas Roslin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecog.07335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Habitat heterogeneity and demographic processes create variability in the major taxonomic diversity trends: 1) biotic homogenization and 2) the emergence of novel community compositions. Nonetheless, little is known about how the imprints of environmental filtering and random demographic processes on community dissimilarity vary over 1) time or 2) space. Quantifying such variation is key to revealing temporal regime shifts, latitudinal trends, and site‐level specificity in the drivers of community dissimilarity.To characterise variation in drivers of community change, we introduce the concept of ‘non‐stationary community responses'. We then apply this concept to estimate temporal and spatial variability in the imprints of climate, land cover and random processes on spatial and temporal dissimilarity of community composition. As a model system, we use multidecadal monitoring data of bird (1147 monitoring sites; 49 years), butterfly (101 monitoring sites; 22 years), and moth (99 monitoring sites; 26 years) communities across a 1200‐km latitudinal gradient in Finland.Regarding spatial dissimilarity, environmental filtering had a larger imprint than what random processes had. For butterflies and moths, environmental filtering shifted from being primarily associated with land cover to being primarily associated with climate indicating a likely regime shift along with warming climate. Regarding temporal dissimilarity of bird and butterfly communities, the imprints of environmental filtering and random processes varied between monitoring sites. A conventional stationary model was unable to track such site‐specific processes. The imprints did not change linearly along a latitudinal gradient.Our results demonstrate that accounting for non‐stationarity in community dynamics is needed to pinpoint temporal shifts and spatial variability in the drivers of community change. Should we assume that community change is driven by the same primary forces at all times and everywhere, then we will fail to detect the real local and contemporary drivers of change, and risk applying the wrong corrective measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecography\",\"volume\":\"147 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecog.07335\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecog.07335","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
The pace and drivers of community change vary over space and time – findings from a national biomonitoring programme
Habitat heterogeneity and demographic processes create variability in the major taxonomic diversity trends: 1) biotic homogenization and 2) the emergence of novel community compositions. Nonetheless, little is known about how the imprints of environmental filtering and random demographic processes on community dissimilarity vary over 1) time or 2) space. Quantifying such variation is key to revealing temporal regime shifts, latitudinal trends, and site‐level specificity in the drivers of community dissimilarity.To characterise variation in drivers of community change, we introduce the concept of ‘non‐stationary community responses'. We then apply this concept to estimate temporal and spatial variability in the imprints of climate, land cover and random processes on spatial and temporal dissimilarity of community composition. As a model system, we use multidecadal monitoring data of bird (1147 monitoring sites; 49 years), butterfly (101 monitoring sites; 22 years), and moth (99 monitoring sites; 26 years) communities across a 1200‐km latitudinal gradient in Finland.Regarding spatial dissimilarity, environmental filtering had a larger imprint than what random processes had. For butterflies and moths, environmental filtering shifted from being primarily associated with land cover to being primarily associated with climate indicating a likely regime shift along with warming climate. Regarding temporal dissimilarity of bird and butterfly communities, the imprints of environmental filtering and random processes varied between monitoring sites. A conventional stationary model was unable to track such site‐specific processes. The imprints did not change linearly along a latitudinal gradient.Our results demonstrate that accounting for non‐stationarity in community dynamics is needed to pinpoint temporal shifts and spatial variability in the drivers of community change. Should we assume that community change is driven by the same primary forces at all times and everywhere, then we will fail to detect the real local and contemporary drivers of change, and risk applying the wrong corrective measures.
期刊介绍:
ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem.
Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography.
Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.