环形与卵形近距离照射器治疗晚期宫颈癌的比较研究。

Reham S Sherif, Hend M Kareem, Reem H El-Gebaly, Mohamed A Shehata, Reham A A Aziz
{"title":"环形与卵形近距离照射器治疗晚期宫颈癌的比较研究。","authors":"Reham S Sherif, Hend M Kareem, Reem H El-Gebaly, Mohamed A Shehata, Reham A A Aziz","doi":"10.1177/09246479251353380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundImage-guided brachytherapy became essential to cervical cancer treatment following chemo-radiotherapy. A variety of applicators including Tandem-Ring (TR) and Tandem-Ovoid (TO) applicators are used to apply brachytherapy.ObjectiveThis study aims to dosimetrically compare TR versus TO applicators by using two different optimization techniques.MethodsBoth applicator sets were applied to the 24 patients. The prescribed dose was 7 Gy/fraction, and the treatment plans were normalized to HR-CTV. Two different optimization techniques are applied, along the four treatment fractions. The first optimization technique was a theoretical assumption that aimed to deliver 7 Gy to 90 % of the volume of the HR-CTV. While the second was the clinical situation which aimed to preserve the organs at risk (OARs) according to the ICRU 89 dose-volume constraints, considering that, 90% of HR-CTV is covered by not less than 90% of the prescribed dose. DVHs were generated, and dosimetric parameters including point A, and D2cc of rectum, bladder, and sigmoid, as well as the dose at different volumes of HR-CTV and IR-CTV, were recorded and compared.ResultsThe results demonstrate that using Ovoid-Tandem applicators achieved significantly higher dose at point A, significantly higher coverage to both HR-CTV and IR-CTV, in addition to significantly better protection to the mean D2cc of the rectum in both optimization techniques. On the other hand, using Ring-Tandem applicators give significantly more protection to the mean D2cc of the bladder, but HR-CTV and IR-CTV have significantly lower coverage.ConclusionOvoid-Tandem and Ring-Tandem applicators are the most common interchangeable intracavitary gynecological applicators. In this study, the results demonstrated that Ovoid-Tandem applicators have the advantages of significantly higher coverage for HR-CTV, and IR-CTV, in addition to more protection for D2cc of the rectum. On the contrary, Ring-Tandem applicators can provide higher protection for D2cc of the bladder, and more comfort to the patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":520800,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of risk & safety in medicine","volume":" ","pages":"9246479251353380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of brachytherapy using ring and ovoid applicators in treatment of advanced cervical cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Reham S Sherif, Hend M Kareem, Reem H El-Gebaly, Mohamed A Shehata, Reham A A Aziz\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09246479251353380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundImage-guided brachytherapy became essential to cervical cancer treatment following chemo-radiotherapy. A variety of applicators including Tandem-Ring (TR) and Tandem-Ovoid (TO) applicators are used to apply brachytherapy.ObjectiveThis study aims to dosimetrically compare TR versus TO applicators by using two different optimization techniques.MethodsBoth applicator sets were applied to the 24 patients. The prescribed dose was 7 Gy/fraction, and the treatment plans were normalized to HR-CTV. Two different optimization techniques are applied, along the four treatment fractions. The first optimization technique was a theoretical assumption that aimed to deliver 7 Gy to 90 % of the volume of the HR-CTV. While the second was the clinical situation which aimed to preserve the organs at risk (OARs) according to the ICRU 89 dose-volume constraints, considering that, 90% of HR-CTV is covered by not less than 90% of the prescribed dose. DVHs were generated, and dosimetric parameters including point A, and D2cc of rectum, bladder, and sigmoid, as well as the dose at different volumes of HR-CTV and IR-CTV, were recorded and compared.ResultsThe results demonstrate that using Ovoid-Tandem applicators achieved significantly higher dose at point A, significantly higher coverage to both HR-CTV and IR-CTV, in addition to significantly better protection to the mean D2cc of the rectum in both optimization techniques. On the other hand, using Ring-Tandem applicators give significantly more protection to the mean D2cc of the bladder, but HR-CTV and IR-CTV have significantly lower coverage.ConclusionOvoid-Tandem and Ring-Tandem applicators are the most common interchangeable intracavitary gynecological applicators. In this study, the results demonstrated that Ovoid-Tandem applicators have the advantages of significantly higher coverage for HR-CTV, and IR-CTV, in addition to more protection for D2cc of the rectum. On the contrary, Ring-Tandem applicators can provide higher protection for D2cc of the bladder, and more comfort to the patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of risk & safety in medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9246479251353380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of risk & safety in medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09246479251353380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of risk & safety in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09246479251353380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:影像引导下的近距离放疗成为化疗后宫颈癌治疗的必要手段。包括串联环形(TR)和串联卵形(TO)涂抹器在内的各种涂抹器用于近距离治疗。目的通过两种不同的优化技术,对TR和to应用器进行剂量学比较。方法对24例患者分别应用两套涂布器。处方剂量为7 Gy/分,治疗方案标准化为HR-CTV。沿着四个处理馏分应用了两种不同的优化技术。第一个优化技术是一个理论假设,旨在提供7 Gy到HR-CTV体积的90%。而第二种是临床情况,目的是根据ICRU 89剂量-体积限制保护处于危险中的器官(OARs),考虑到90%的HR-CTV被不少于90%的处方剂量覆盖。生成dvh,记录直肠、膀胱、乙状结肠A点、D2cc等剂量学参数,并比较不同体积HR-CTV、IR-CTV的剂量。结果结果表明,使用卵圆串联涂药器在A点获得了更高的剂量,对HR-CTV和IR-CTV的覆盖率都显著提高,此外,两种优化技术对直肠平均D2cc的保护也明显更好。另一方面,使用Ring-Tandem涂布器对膀胱平均D2cc的保护明显更多,但HR-CTV和IR-CTV的覆盖率明显较低。结论卵泡串联式和环形串联式是妇科最常见的可互换腔内应用器。在本研究中,结果表明,卵泡-串联应用器具有明显更高的HR-CTV覆盖率和IR-CTV覆盖率,以及对直肠D2cc的更多保护。相反,Ring-Tandem应用器可以对膀胱D2cc提供更高的保护,并且对患者更舒适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study of brachytherapy using ring and ovoid applicators in treatment of advanced cervical cancer.

BackgroundImage-guided brachytherapy became essential to cervical cancer treatment following chemo-radiotherapy. A variety of applicators including Tandem-Ring (TR) and Tandem-Ovoid (TO) applicators are used to apply brachytherapy.ObjectiveThis study aims to dosimetrically compare TR versus TO applicators by using two different optimization techniques.MethodsBoth applicator sets were applied to the 24 patients. The prescribed dose was 7 Gy/fraction, and the treatment plans were normalized to HR-CTV. Two different optimization techniques are applied, along the four treatment fractions. The first optimization technique was a theoretical assumption that aimed to deliver 7 Gy to 90 % of the volume of the HR-CTV. While the second was the clinical situation which aimed to preserve the organs at risk (OARs) according to the ICRU 89 dose-volume constraints, considering that, 90% of HR-CTV is covered by not less than 90% of the prescribed dose. DVHs were generated, and dosimetric parameters including point A, and D2cc of rectum, bladder, and sigmoid, as well as the dose at different volumes of HR-CTV and IR-CTV, were recorded and compared.ResultsThe results demonstrate that using Ovoid-Tandem applicators achieved significantly higher dose at point A, significantly higher coverage to both HR-CTV and IR-CTV, in addition to significantly better protection to the mean D2cc of the rectum in both optimization techniques. On the other hand, using Ring-Tandem applicators give significantly more protection to the mean D2cc of the bladder, but HR-CTV and IR-CTV have significantly lower coverage.ConclusionOvoid-Tandem and Ring-Tandem applicators are the most common interchangeable intracavitary gynecological applicators. In this study, the results demonstrated that Ovoid-Tandem applicators have the advantages of significantly higher coverage for HR-CTV, and IR-CTV, in addition to more protection for D2cc of the rectum. On the contrary, Ring-Tandem applicators can provide higher protection for D2cc of the bladder, and more comfort to the patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信