磷酸氨福定(Firdapse®)在日本Lambert-Eaton肌无力综合征患者中的长期疗效和安全性(LMS-005研究)。

IF 1.1
Yuki Hatanaka, Madoka Mori-Yoshimura, Kimiaki Utsugisawa, Akira Tsujino, Nobuya Fujita, Ichiro Yabe, Yuko Igarashi, Masakatsu Motomura
{"title":"磷酸氨福定(Firdapse®)在日本Lambert-Eaton肌无力综合征患者中的长期疗效和安全性(LMS-005研究)。","authors":"Yuki Hatanaka, Madoka Mori-Yoshimura, Kimiaki Utsugisawa, Akira Tsujino, Nobuya Fujita, Ichiro Yabe, Yuko Igarashi, Masakatsu Motomura","doi":"10.2169/internalmedicine.5363-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of amifampridine (3,4-diaminopyridine) phosphate in Japanese adults with Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS). Methods The LMS-005 study was an uncontrolled, single-blind (patient blinded), multicenter, one-year phase 3 clinical study. The administration of amifampridine phosphate was started at 15 mg/day, and the dose was increased every 3 to 4 days to determine the optimal dose for each patient. After 7 days of treatment with the optimal dose, efficacy was assessed by evaluating quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG), subject global impression (SGI), and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (CGI-I) scores. Patients Adult patients with LEMS were analyzed for safety (n=12, mean age±standard deviation [SD] of 61.1±14.6 years old) and efficacy (n=10, mean age±SD of 60.7±15.9 years old). Results In the efficacy population, the mean±SD (median [interquartile range]) QMG score was 13.2±3.1 (13.5 [11.0, 15.0]) at baseline and 8.0±2.7 (8.0 [6.0, 9.0]) at the end of the treatment period, with a mean±SD (median [interquartile range]) change of -5.2±2.8 (-5.5 [-7.0, -3.0]). All patients showed a decrease in the QMG score from baseline and experienced improvement in their LEMS symptoms. The SGI/CGI-I scores also improved. Efficacy was maintained until the end of the study. Five patients in the safety population experienced adverse drug reactions, the most common of which was dysesthesia (n=2). Conclusion This study revealed the long-term efficacy and tolerability of amifampridine phosphate in Japanese adults with LEMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":520650,"journal":{"name":"Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Amifampridine Phosphate (Firdapse<sup>®</sup>) in Japanese Patients with Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (LMS-005 Study).\",\"authors\":\"Yuki Hatanaka, Madoka Mori-Yoshimura, Kimiaki Utsugisawa, Akira Tsujino, Nobuya Fujita, Ichiro Yabe, Yuko Igarashi, Masakatsu Motomura\",\"doi\":\"10.2169/internalmedicine.5363-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of amifampridine (3,4-diaminopyridine) phosphate in Japanese adults with Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS). Methods The LMS-005 study was an uncontrolled, single-blind (patient blinded), multicenter, one-year phase 3 clinical study. The administration of amifampridine phosphate was started at 15 mg/day, and the dose was increased every 3 to 4 days to determine the optimal dose for each patient. After 7 days of treatment with the optimal dose, efficacy was assessed by evaluating quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG), subject global impression (SGI), and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (CGI-I) scores. Patients Adult patients with LEMS were analyzed for safety (n=12, mean age±standard deviation [SD] of 61.1±14.6 years old) and efficacy (n=10, mean age±SD of 60.7±15.9 years old). Results In the efficacy population, the mean±SD (median [interquartile range]) QMG score was 13.2±3.1 (13.5 [11.0, 15.0]) at baseline and 8.0±2.7 (8.0 [6.0, 9.0]) at the end of the treatment period, with a mean±SD (median [interquartile range]) change of -5.2±2.8 (-5.5 [-7.0, -3.0]). All patients showed a decrease in the QMG score from baseline and experienced improvement in their LEMS symptoms. The SGI/CGI-I scores also improved. Efficacy was maintained until the end of the study. Five patients in the safety population experienced adverse drug reactions, the most common of which was dysesthesia (n=2). Conclusion This study revealed the long-term efficacy and tolerability of amifampridine phosphate in Japanese adults with LEMS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.5363-25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.5363-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价磷酸氨基吡啶(3,4-二氨基吡啶)治疗日本成人Lambert-Eaton肌无力综合征(LEMS)的疗效和安全性。方法LMS-005是一项非对照、单盲(患者盲)、多中心、为期一年的3期临床研究。磷酸氨苯丙啶起始剂量为15mg /天,每3 ~ 4天增加一次剂量,以确定每位患者的最佳剂量。以最佳剂量治疗7天后,通过定量重症肌无力(QMG)、受试者整体印象(SGI)和临床整体印象改善量表(CGI-I)评分评估疗效。分析成年LEMS患者的安全性(n=12,平均年龄±标准差[SD]为61.1±14.6岁)和疗效(n=10,平均年龄±SD为60.7±15.9岁)。结果在有效人群中,QMG评分基线时的平均值±SD(中位数[四分位间距])为13.2±3.1(13.5[11.0,15.0]),治疗期结束时的平均值±SD(中位数[四分位间距])为8.0±2.7(8.0[6.0,9.0]),平均±SD(中位数[四分位间距])变化为-5.2±2.8(-5.5[-7.0,-3.0])。所有患者的QMG评分均较基线有所下降,LEMS症状有所改善。SGI/CGI-I评分也有所提高。疗效一直保持到研究结束。安全人群中有5例患者出现药物不良反应,其中最常见的是感觉不良(n=2)。结论本研究揭示了磷酸氨福定对日本成年LEMS患者的长期疗效和耐受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Amifampridine Phosphate (Firdapse®) in Japanese Patients with Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (LMS-005 Study).

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of amifampridine (3,4-diaminopyridine) phosphate in Japanese adults with Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS). Methods The LMS-005 study was an uncontrolled, single-blind (patient blinded), multicenter, one-year phase 3 clinical study. The administration of amifampridine phosphate was started at 15 mg/day, and the dose was increased every 3 to 4 days to determine the optimal dose for each patient. After 7 days of treatment with the optimal dose, efficacy was assessed by evaluating quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG), subject global impression (SGI), and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (CGI-I) scores. Patients Adult patients with LEMS were analyzed for safety (n=12, mean age±standard deviation [SD] of 61.1±14.6 years old) and efficacy (n=10, mean age±SD of 60.7±15.9 years old). Results In the efficacy population, the mean±SD (median [interquartile range]) QMG score was 13.2±3.1 (13.5 [11.0, 15.0]) at baseline and 8.0±2.7 (8.0 [6.0, 9.0]) at the end of the treatment period, with a mean±SD (median [interquartile range]) change of -5.2±2.8 (-5.5 [-7.0, -3.0]). All patients showed a decrease in the QMG score from baseline and experienced improvement in their LEMS symptoms. The SGI/CGI-I scores also improved. Efficacy was maintained until the end of the study. Five patients in the safety population experienced adverse drug reactions, the most common of which was dysesthesia (n=2). Conclusion This study revealed the long-term efficacy and tolerability of amifampridine phosphate in Japanese adults with LEMS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信