[初级保健中腰痛的影像过度诊断]。

Harefuah Pub Date : 2025-06-01
Reem Samir Abboud, Gill E Sviri
{"title":"[初级保健中腰痛的影像过度诊断]。","authors":"Reem Samir Abboud, Gill E Sviri","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lower back pain (LBP) is a common symptom among the general population. Most LBPs are classified as non-specific back pain, which is a common reason for seeking medical treatment. However, only a minority will experience a serious etiology whereas most will often present additional risk factors or symptoms.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Analyzing the current literature and common guidelines to understand the various aspects of overdiagnosing LBP in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A current literature review was conducted to investigate the connections between the data and qualitative-quantitative analysis of the data to create a structured summary. Qualitative and quantitative articles discussing, directly or indirectly, the various aspects of overdiagnosis of LBP among primary care providers were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most international clinical guidelines have prioritized non-medical approaches for patients with LBP. Many healthcare providers are not designed to support this approach when guideline-compliant clinical implementation requires system-wide changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LBP treatment and diagnosis should pay more attention to primary care physicians as better education and regulation should be implemented to reduce overdiagnosis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Overdiagnosis of LBP in primary care burdens the system and harms patients for many and varied reasons. The existing guidelines must be organized and assimilated among primary care physicians, along with the establishment of a sufficient and uniform comprehensive system that supports the current approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":101459,"journal":{"name":"Harefuah","volume":"164 6","pages":"376-382"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[IMAGING OVER-DIAGNOSIS OF LOW BACK PAIN IN PRIMARY CARE].\",\"authors\":\"Reem Samir Abboud, Gill E Sviri\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lower back pain (LBP) is a common symptom among the general population. Most LBPs are classified as non-specific back pain, which is a common reason for seeking medical treatment. However, only a minority will experience a serious etiology whereas most will often present additional risk factors or symptoms.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Analyzing the current literature and common guidelines to understand the various aspects of overdiagnosing LBP in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A current literature review was conducted to investigate the connections between the data and qualitative-quantitative analysis of the data to create a structured summary. Qualitative and quantitative articles discussing, directly or indirectly, the various aspects of overdiagnosis of LBP among primary care providers were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most international clinical guidelines have prioritized non-medical approaches for patients with LBP. Many healthcare providers are not designed to support this approach when guideline-compliant clinical implementation requires system-wide changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LBP treatment and diagnosis should pay more attention to primary care physicians as better education and regulation should be implemented to reduce overdiagnosis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Overdiagnosis of LBP in primary care burdens the system and harms patients for many and varied reasons. The existing guidelines must be organized and assimilated among primary care physicians, along with the establishment of a sufficient and uniform comprehensive system that supports the current approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harefuah\",\"volume\":\"164 6\",\"pages\":\"376-382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harefuah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harefuah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:腰痛(LBP)是普通人群的常见症状。大多数腰痛被归类为非特异性背部疼痛,这是寻求医学治疗的常见原因。然而,只有少数人会经历严重的病因,而大多数人通常会出现额外的危险因素或症状。目的:分析现有文献和常用指南,了解初级保健中过度诊断腰痛的各个方面。方法:对现有文献进行回顾,以调查数据之间的联系,并对数据进行定性定量分析,以创建结构化摘要。定性和定量的文章直接或间接地讨论了初级保健提供者中腰痛过度诊断的各个方面。结果:大多数国际临床指南优先考虑非医学方法治疗腰痛患者。当符合指南的临床实施需要全系统更改时,许多医疗保健提供者不支持这种方法。结论:LBP的治疗和诊断应引起初级保健医生的重视,加强教育和监管,以减少过度诊断。讨论:由于许多不同的原因,初级保健对腰痛的过度诊断给系统带来了负担,并损害了患者。现有的指导方针必须在初级保健医生中组织和吸收,同时建立一个充分和统一的综合系统来支持当前的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[IMAGING OVER-DIAGNOSIS OF LOW BACK PAIN IN PRIMARY CARE].

Introduction: Lower back pain (LBP) is a common symptom among the general population. Most LBPs are classified as non-specific back pain, which is a common reason for seeking medical treatment. However, only a minority will experience a serious etiology whereas most will often present additional risk factors or symptoms.

Aims: Analyzing the current literature and common guidelines to understand the various aspects of overdiagnosing LBP in primary care.

Methods: A current literature review was conducted to investigate the connections between the data and qualitative-quantitative analysis of the data to create a structured summary. Qualitative and quantitative articles discussing, directly or indirectly, the various aspects of overdiagnosis of LBP among primary care providers were included.

Results: Most international clinical guidelines have prioritized non-medical approaches for patients with LBP. Many healthcare providers are not designed to support this approach when guideline-compliant clinical implementation requires system-wide changes.

Conclusions: LBP treatment and diagnosis should pay more attention to primary care physicians as better education and regulation should be implemented to reduce overdiagnosis.

Discussion: Overdiagnosis of LBP in primary care burdens the system and harms patients for many and varied reasons. The existing guidelines must be organized and assimilated among primary care physicians, along with the establishment of a sufficient and uniform comprehensive system that supports the current approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信