恒牙重要牙髓治疗:系统回顾与荟萃分析。

Pediatric dentistry Pub Date : 2025-05-15
James A Coll, Vineet Dhar, Marcio Guelmann, Yasmi O Crystal, Chia-Yu Chen, Abdullah A Marghalani, Shahad AlShamali, Zheng Xu, Gerald Glickman, Amber Ather, Michael Sabeti, Rachel Wedeward
{"title":"恒牙重要牙髓治疗:系统回顾与荟萃分析。","authors":"James A Coll, Vineet Dhar, Marcio Guelmann, Yasmi O Crystal, Chia-Yu Chen, Abdullah A Marghalani, Shahad AlShamali, Zheng Xu, Gerald Glickman, Amber Ather, Michael Sabeti, Rachel Wedeward","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To determine factors affecting permanent tooth vital pulp therapy (VPT) success from a systematic review (SR) and metaanalyses. <b>Methods:</b> SRs of databases were completed through June 2024, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used for the certainty of evidence. <b>Results:</b> The 24-month indirect pulp treatment (IPT), direct pulp capping (DPC), partial pulpotomy (PP), and full pulpotomy (FP) successes (91 to 97 percent) were not statistically different (P=0.19) in teeth diagnosed with normal pulp/reversible pulpitis (NP/RP). IPT (94 percent) versus DPC (87 percent) success at 36 months was not significantly different when calcium silicate cement (CS) was used for DPC in teeth diagnosed with NP/RP (P=0.10). PP success versus DPC was equal (96 percent) after 24 months in teeth diagnosed with NP/RP if CS was used for DPC. Teeth exhibiting symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (SIP) were defined as exhibiting spontaneous unprovoked pain, lingering thermal pain, or referred pain, and may have periapical pathosis/involvement or not. One study's data on the five-year success rate for FP in teeth with SIP was 78 percent, and teeth without PPI showed significantly increased success (P=0.04). PP/FP success (90 percent) in teeth with SIP was not significantly different versus PP/FP success (97 percent) in NP/RP teeth (P=0.054). Selective caries removal minimized pulp exposures in teeth with deep caries diagnosed with NP/RP. For teeth diagnosed with SIP or extremely deep caries, complete caries removal is recommended to expose the pulp. If pulpal bleeding is controlled, it is recommended to perform a full pulpotomy. Hemo- stasis within six minutes likely improves pulpotomy success. Mineral trioxide aggregate was found to discolor teeth significantly more (83 percent) than Biodentine (zero percent) containing no bismuth oxide (P<0.001) PP/FP were significantly more successful for traumatic pulp exposures than DPC (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.001). Root maturity did not affect PP/FP success for NP/RP teeth. <b>Conclusions:</b> All vital pulp therapy methods are successful for teeth diagnosed with normal pulp/reversible pulpitis. Teeth diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis can be treated successfully with a full pulpotomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":101357,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric dentistry","volume":"47 3","pages":"137-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vital Pulp Therapy in Permanent Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.\",\"authors\":\"James A Coll, Vineet Dhar, Marcio Guelmann, Yasmi O Crystal, Chia-Yu Chen, Abdullah A Marghalani, Shahad AlShamali, Zheng Xu, Gerald Glickman, Amber Ather, Michael Sabeti, Rachel Wedeward\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To determine factors affecting permanent tooth vital pulp therapy (VPT) success from a systematic review (SR) and metaanalyses. <b>Methods:</b> SRs of databases were completed through June 2024, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used for the certainty of evidence. <b>Results:</b> The 24-month indirect pulp treatment (IPT), direct pulp capping (DPC), partial pulpotomy (PP), and full pulpotomy (FP) successes (91 to 97 percent) were not statistically different (P=0.19) in teeth diagnosed with normal pulp/reversible pulpitis (NP/RP). IPT (94 percent) versus DPC (87 percent) success at 36 months was not significantly different when calcium silicate cement (CS) was used for DPC in teeth diagnosed with NP/RP (P=0.10). PP success versus DPC was equal (96 percent) after 24 months in teeth diagnosed with NP/RP if CS was used for DPC. Teeth exhibiting symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (SIP) were defined as exhibiting spontaneous unprovoked pain, lingering thermal pain, or referred pain, and may have periapical pathosis/involvement or not. One study's data on the five-year success rate for FP in teeth with SIP was 78 percent, and teeth without PPI showed significantly increased success (P=0.04). PP/FP success (90 percent) in teeth with SIP was not significantly different versus PP/FP success (97 percent) in NP/RP teeth (P=0.054). Selective caries removal minimized pulp exposures in teeth with deep caries diagnosed with NP/RP. For teeth diagnosed with SIP or extremely deep caries, complete caries removal is recommended to expose the pulp. If pulpal bleeding is controlled, it is recommended to perform a full pulpotomy. Hemo- stasis within six minutes likely improves pulpotomy success. Mineral trioxide aggregate was found to discolor teeth significantly more (83 percent) than Biodentine (zero percent) containing no bismuth oxide (P<0.001) PP/FP were significantly more successful for traumatic pulp exposures than DPC (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.001). Root maturity did not affect PP/FP success for NP/RP teeth. <b>Conclusions:</b> All vital pulp therapy methods are successful for teeth diagnosed with normal pulp/reversible pulpitis. Teeth diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis can be treated successfully with a full pulpotomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric dentistry\",\"volume\":\"47 3\",\"pages\":\"137-150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,确定影响恒牙生命髓治疗(VPT)成功的因素。方法:截至2024年6月完成数据库的SRs,采用分级推荐评估、发展和评价(GRADE)方法确定证据。结果:24个月的间接牙髓治疗(IPT)、直接牙髓盖盖(DPC)、部分牙髓切开术(PP)和完全牙髓切开术(FP)的成功率(91% ~ 97%)在诊断为正常牙髓/可逆性牙髓炎(NP/RP)的牙中差异无统计学意义(P=0.19)。当在诊断为NP/RP的牙齿中使用硅酸钙水泥(CS)进行DPC时,IPT(94%)与DPC(87%)在36个月时的成功率没有显著差异(P=0.10)。在诊断为NP/RP的牙齿24个月后,如果使用CS进行DPC, PP成功率与DPC相同(96%)。表现出症状性不可逆牙髓炎(SIP)的牙齿被定义为表现出自发的无因性疼痛、持续的热痛或牵涉性疼痛,并且可能有根尖周围病变/累及或没有。一项研究数据显示,在有SIP的牙齿中,FP的五年成功率为78%,而没有PPI的牙齿成功率显着增加(P=0.04)。SIP牙的PP/FP成功率(90%)与NP/RP牙的PP/FP成功率(97%)无显著差异(P=0.054)。选择性除龋可减少诊断为NP/RP的深龋患者的牙髓暴露。对于被诊断为轻度蛀牙或极深蛀牙的牙齿,建议完全拔除蛀牙,露出牙髓。如果髓质出血得到控制,建议行全髓切开术。6分钟内瘀血可能提高截髓成功率。三氧化二矿骨料的牙齿变色率(83%)明显高于不含氧化铋的生物牙汀(0%)(PP≤0.001)。牙根成熟度不影响NP/RP牙的PP/FP成功。结论:对于正常牙髓/可逆性牙髓炎,所有牙髓治疗方法均取得成功。诊断为症状性不可逆性牙髓炎的牙齿可以通过全牙髓切开术成功治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vital Pulp Therapy in Permanent Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.

Purpose: To determine factors affecting permanent tooth vital pulp therapy (VPT) success from a systematic review (SR) and metaanalyses. Methods: SRs of databases were completed through June 2024, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used for the certainty of evidence. Results: The 24-month indirect pulp treatment (IPT), direct pulp capping (DPC), partial pulpotomy (PP), and full pulpotomy (FP) successes (91 to 97 percent) were not statistically different (P=0.19) in teeth diagnosed with normal pulp/reversible pulpitis (NP/RP). IPT (94 percent) versus DPC (87 percent) success at 36 months was not significantly different when calcium silicate cement (CS) was used for DPC in teeth diagnosed with NP/RP (P=0.10). PP success versus DPC was equal (96 percent) after 24 months in teeth diagnosed with NP/RP if CS was used for DPC. Teeth exhibiting symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (SIP) were defined as exhibiting spontaneous unprovoked pain, lingering thermal pain, or referred pain, and may have periapical pathosis/involvement or not. One study's data on the five-year success rate for FP in teeth with SIP was 78 percent, and teeth without PPI showed significantly increased success (P=0.04). PP/FP success (90 percent) in teeth with SIP was not significantly different versus PP/FP success (97 percent) in NP/RP teeth (P=0.054). Selective caries removal minimized pulp exposures in teeth with deep caries diagnosed with NP/RP. For teeth diagnosed with SIP or extremely deep caries, complete caries removal is recommended to expose the pulp. If pulpal bleeding is controlled, it is recommended to perform a full pulpotomy. Hemo- stasis within six minutes likely improves pulpotomy success. Mineral trioxide aggregate was found to discolor teeth significantly more (83 percent) than Biodentine (zero percent) containing no bismuth oxide (P<0.001) PP/FP were significantly more successful for traumatic pulp exposures than DPC (P ≤ 0.001). Root maturity did not affect PP/FP success for NP/RP teeth. Conclusions: All vital pulp therapy methods are successful for teeth diagnosed with normal pulp/reversible pulpitis. Teeth diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis can be treated successfully with a full pulpotomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信