Alina Ricalde, Jung-Wei Chen, Luana J Lim, Jungyi Alexis Liu
{"title":"树脂改性玻璃离聚体即刻与延迟放置在氟二胺银牙上的离体颜色变化。","authors":"Alina Ricalde, Jung-Wei Chen, Luana J Lim, Jungyi Alexis Liu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To investigate the color difference between groups and changes over time of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) restorations placed immediately after silver diammine fluoride (SDF) treatment. <b>Methods:</b> Thirty-six specimens were prepared from extracted human third molars, had caries artificially induced, and were divided into three groups (N equals 12): (1) control group (CG): non-SDF-treated teeth restored with RMGI; (2) group one (G1): SDF-treated teeth restored immediately with RMGI; and (3) group two (G2): SDF-treated teeth stored in saliva sub- stitute for two weeks then restored with RMGI. A Vita Easyshade ® Advance 4.0 Spectrophotometer was used to determine CIE L*a*b* values of each specimen at three different time points: (1) demineralized dentin prior to SDF application (T0); (2) following restoration (T1); and (3) two weeks following restoration (T2). The color difference ( Δ E*) and color values (L*a*b*) were analyzed within and between groups. Significance was set to P<0.05. <b>Results:</b> There was no significant difference in the amount of discoloration from T1 to T2 between G1 and G2, but both were significantly different from the CG (P<0.001). At T2, however, G1 had a lower, darker, average L* value(L*equals 65.27+ 1.34), which was significantly different from G2 (L*equals 69.18 + 1.39) and CG (L*equals 79.85+ 0.99; P<0.001). Furthermore, the color difference between groups at T1 and T2 was clinically detectable ( Δ E* >2.7). <b>Conclusions:</b> A two-week delay in in-vitro resin-modified glass ionomer restoration placement over SDF arrested carious lesions resulted in a lighter restoration; however, it did not prevent or reduce color change over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":101357,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric dentistry","volume":"47 3","pages":"172-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>In Vitro</i> Color Change of Immediate Versus Delayed Placement of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Over Silver Diammine Fluoride-Treated Teeth.\",\"authors\":\"Alina Ricalde, Jung-Wei Chen, Luana J Lim, Jungyi Alexis Liu\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To investigate the color difference between groups and changes over time of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) restorations placed immediately after silver diammine fluoride (SDF) treatment. <b>Methods:</b> Thirty-six specimens were prepared from extracted human third molars, had caries artificially induced, and were divided into three groups (N equals 12): (1) control group (CG): non-SDF-treated teeth restored with RMGI; (2) group one (G1): SDF-treated teeth restored immediately with RMGI; and (3) group two (G2): SDF-treated teeth stored in saliva sub- stitute for two weeks then restored with RMGI. A Vita Easyshade ® Advance 4.0 Spectrophotometer was used to determine CIE L*a*b* values of each specimen at three different time points: (1) demineralized dentin prior to SDF application (T0); (2) following restoration (T1); and (3) two weeks following restoration (T2). The color difference ( Δ E*) and color values (L*a*b*) were analyzed within and between groups. Significance was set to P<0.05. <b>Results:</b> There was no significant difference in the amount of discoloration from T1 to T2 between G1 and G2, but both were significantly different from the CG (P<0.001). At T2, however, G1 had a lower, darker, average L* value(L*equals 65.27+ 1.34), which was significantly different from G2 (L*equals 69.18 + 1.39) and CG (L*equals 79.85+ 0.99; P<0.001). Furthermore, the color difference between groups at T1 and T2 was clinically detectable ( Δ E* >2.7). <b>Conclusions:</b> A two-week delay in in-vitro resin-modified glass ionomer restoration placement over SDF arrested carious lesions resulted in a lighter restoration; however, it did not prevent or reduce color change over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric dentistry\",\"volume\":\"47 3\",\"pages\":\"172-177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In Vitro Color Change of Immediate Versus Delayed Placement of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Over Silver Diammine Fluoride-Treated Teeth.
Purpose: To investigate the color difference between groups and changes over time of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) restorations placed immediately after silver diammine fluoride (SDF) treatment. Methods: Thirty-six specimens were prepared from extracted human third molars, had caries artificially induced, and were divided into three groups (N equals 12): (1) control group (CG): non-SDF-treated teeth restored with RMGI; (2) group one (G1): SDF-treated teeth restored immediately with RMGI; and (3) group two (G2): SDF-treated teeth stored in saliva sub- stitute for two weeks then restored with RMGI. A Vita Easyshade ® Advance 4.0 Spectrophotometer was used to determine CIE L*a*b* values of each specimen at three different time points: (1) demineralized dentin prior to SDF application (T0); (2) following restoration (T1); and (3) two weeks following restoration (T2). The color difference ( Δ E*) and color values (L*a*b*) were analyzed within and between groups. Significance was set to P<0.05. Results: There was no significant difference in the amount of discoloration from T1 to T2 between G1 and G2, but both were significantly different from the CG (P<0.001). At T2, however, G1 had a lower, darker, average L* value(L*equals 65.27+ 1.34), which was significantly different from G2 (L*equals 69.18 + 1.39) and CG (L*equals 79.85+ 0.99; P<0.001). Furthermore, the color difference between groups at T1 and T2 was clinically detectable ( Δ E* >2.7). Conclusions: A two-week delay in in-vitro resin-modified glass ionomer restoration placement over SDF arrested carious lesions resulted in a lighter restoration; however, it did not prevent or reduce color change over time.