Rawan F Ayyad, Alaa Ayyad, Raghad Sweity, Mayar Idkedek, Firas Abu Akar
{"title":"无订书机单门静脉电视胸腔镜手术:病例系列及文献回顾。","authors":"Rawan F Ayyad, Alaa Ayyad, Raghad Sweity, Mayar Idkedek, Firas Abu Akar","doi":"10.5761/atcs.oa.25-00009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is a minimally invasive approach widely used for lung resections. However, reliance on staplers increases costs, limiting its adoption in resource-constrained settings. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety, and cost-effectiveness of uniportal stapler-less VATS lobectomies and segmentectomies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 7 stapler-less uniportal VATS surgeries performed between March 2021 and February 2022 was conducted. Data on operative time, blood loss, postoperative outcomes, and complications were collected from patient records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven procedures were completed with an average operative time of 80 min (range: 48-118 min). Estimated blood loss was minimal (10-100 mL) in 6 cases. One patient required conversion to open thoracotomy due to vessel injury. Postoperatively, all patients were stable with no major complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stapler-less VATS is a viable, cost-effective alternative to conventional techniques, offering comparable safety and outcomes. This approach supports broader adoption of minimally invasive surgery, particularly in low-income settings, where reducing procedural costs is critical.</p>","PeriodicalId":93877,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12173480/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stapler-Less Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.\",\"authors\":\"Rawan F Ayyad, Alaa Ayyad, Raghad Sweity, Mayar Idkedek, Firas Abu Akar\",\"doi\":\"10.5761/atcs.oa.25-00009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is a minimally invasive approach widely used for lung resections. However, reliance on staplers increases costs, limiting its adoption in resource-constrained settings. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety, and cost-effectiveness of uniportal stapler-less VATS lobectomies and segmentectomies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 7 stapler-less uniportal VATS surgeries performed between March 2021 and February 2022 was conducted. Data on operative time, blood loss, postoperative outcomes, and complications were collected from patient records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven procedures were completed with an average operative time of 80 min (range: 48-118 min). Estimated blood loss was minimal (10-100 mL) in 6 cases. One patient required conversion to open thoracotomy due to vessel injury. Postoperatively, all patients were stable with no major complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stapler-less VATS is a viable, cost-effective alternative to conventional techniques, offering comparable safety and outcomes. This approach supports broader adoption of minimally invasive surgery, particularly in low-income settings, where reducing procedural costs is critical.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12173480/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.25-00009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.25-00009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Stapler-Less Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.
Purpose: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is a minimally invasive approach widely used for lung resections. However, reliance on staplers increases costs, limiting its adoption in resource-constrained settings. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety, and cost-effectiveness of uniportal stapler-less VATS lobectomies and segmentectomies.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of 7 stapler-less uniportal VATS surgeries performed between March 2021 and February 2022 was conducted. Data on operative time, blood loss, postoperative outcomes, and complications were collected from patient records.
Results: Seven procedures were completed with an average operative time of 80 min (range: 48-118 min). Estimated blood loss was minimal (10-100 mL) in 6 cases. One patient required conversion to open thoracotomy due to vessel injury. Postoperatively, all patients were stable with no major complications.
Conclusion: Stapler-less VATS is a viable, cost-effective alternative to conventional techniques, offering comparable safety and outcomes. This approach supports broader adoption of minimally invasive surgery, particularly in low-income settings, where reducing procedural costs is critical.