基于2.5D磁共振成像的腮腺肿瘤深度学习鉴别诊断

IF 4.3
Annals of medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-18 DOI:10.1080/07853890.2025.2520401
Wenfeng Mai, Xiaole Fan, Lingtao Zhang, Jian Li, Liting Chen, Xiaoyu Hua, Dong Zhang, Hengguo Li, Minxiang Cai, Changzheng Shi, Xiangning Liu
{"title":"基于2.5D磁共振成像的腮腺肿瘤深度学习鉴别诊断","authors":"Wenfeng Mai, Xiaole Fan, Lingtao Zhang, Jian Li, Liting Chen, Xiaoyu Hua, Dong Zhang, Hengguo Li, Minxiang Cai, Changzheng Shi, Xiangning Liu","doi":"10.1080/07853890.2025.2520401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Accurate preoperative diagnosis of parotid gland tumors (PGTs) is crucial for surgical planning since malignant tumors require more extensive excision. Though fine-needle aspiration biopsy is the diagnostic gold standard, its sensitivity in detecting malignancies is limited. While Deep learning (DL) models based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are common in medicine, they are less studied for parotid gland tumors. This study used a 2.5D imaging approach (Incorporating Inter-Slice Information) to train a DL model to differentiate between benign and malignant PGTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 122 parotid tumor patients, using MRI and clinical features to build predictive models. In the traditional model, univariate analysis identified statistically significant features, which were then used in multivariate logistic regression to determine independent predictors. The model was built using four-fold cross-validation. The deep learning model was trained using 2D and 2.5D imaging approaches, with a transformer-based architecture employed for transfer learning. The model's performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and confusion matrix metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the traditional model, boundary and peritumoral invasion were identified as independent predictors for PGTs, and the model was constructed based on these features. The model achieved an AUC of 0.79 but demonstrated low sensitivity (0.54). In contrast, the DL model based on 2.5D T2 fat-suppressed images showed superior performance, with an AUC of 0.86 and a sensitivity of 0.78.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 2.5D imaging technique, when integrated with a transformer-based transfer learning model, demonstrates significant efficacy in differentiating between PGTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":93874,"journal":{"name":"Annals of medicine","volume":"57 1","pages":"2520401"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12180351/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning for differential diagnosis of parotid tumors based on 2.5D magnetic resonance imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Wenfeng Mai, Xiaole Fan, Lingtao Zhang, Jian Li, Liting Chen, Xiaoyu Hua, Dong Zhang, Hengguo Li, Minxiang Cai, Changzheng Shi, Xiangning Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07853890.2025.2520401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Accurate preoperative diagnosis of parotid gland tumors (PGTs) is crucial for surgical planning since malignant tumors require more extensive excision. Though fine-needle aspiration biopsy is the diagnostic gold standard, its sensitivity in detecting malignancies is limited. While Deep learning (DL) models based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are common in medicine, they are less studied for parotid gland tumors. This study used a 2.5D imaging approach (Incorporating Inter-Slice Information) to train a DL model to differentiate between benign and malignant PGTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 122 parotid tumor patients, using MRI and clinical features to build predictive models. In the traditional model, univariate analysis identified statistically significant features, which were then used in multivariate logistic regression to determine independent predictors. The model was built using four-fold cross-validation. The deep learning model was trained using 2D and 2.5D imaging approaches, with a transformer-based architecture employed for transfer learning. The model's performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and confusion matrix metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the traditional model, boundary and peritumoral invasion were identified as independent predictors for PGTs, and the model was constructed based on these features. The model achieved an AUC of 0.79 but demonstrated low sensitivity (0.54). In contrast, the DL model based on 2.5D T2 fat-suppressed images showed superior performance, with an AUC of 0.86 and a sensitivity of 0.78.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 2.5D imaging technique, when integrated with a transformer-based transfer learning model, demonstrates significant efficacy in differentiating between PGTs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of medicine\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"2520401\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12180351/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2025.2520401\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2025.2520401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:腮腺肿瘤的术前准确诊断对手术规划至关重要,因为恶性肿瘤需要更广泛的切除。虽然细针穿刺活检是诊断的金标准,但其检测恶性肿瘤的敏感性有限。虽然基于磁共振成像(MRI)的深度学习(DL)模型在医学中很常见,但对腮腺肿瘤的研究较少。本研究使用2.5D成像方法(结合层间信息)来训练DL模型以区分良性和恶性pgt。方法:回顾性研究122例腮腺肿瘤患者,利用MRI和临床特征建立预测模型。在传统模型中,单变量分析确定统计显著特征,然后将其用于多变量逻辑回归以确定独立预测因子。采用四重交叉验证建立模型。深度学习模型使用2D和2.5D成像方法进行训练,并采用基于变压器的架构进行迁移学习。该模型的性能评价采用了接收机工作特性曲线下面积(AUC)和混淆矩阵指标。结果:在传统模型中,边界和肿瘤周围浸润被确定为pgt的独立预测因子,并基于这些特征构建模型。该模型的AUC为0.79,但灵敏度较低(0.54)。相比之下,基于2.5D T2脂肪抑制图像的DL模型表现出更好的性能,AUC为0.86,灵敏度为0.78。结论:2.5D成像技术与基于变压器的迁移学习模型相结合,在区分pgt方面具有显著的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Deep learning for differential diagnosis of parotid tumors based on 2.5D magnetic resonance imaging.

Deep learning for differential diagnosis of parotid tumors based on 2.5D magnetic resonance imaging.

Deep learning for differential diagnosis of parotid tumors based on 2.5D magnetic resonance imaging.

Deep learning for differential diagnosis of parotid tumors based on 2.5D magnetic resonance imaging.

Purpose: Accurate preoperative diagnosis of parotid gland tumors (PGTs) is crucial for surgical planning since malignant tumors require more extensive excision. Though fine-needle aspiration biopsy is the diagnostic gold standard, its sensitivity in detecting malignancies is limited. While Deep learning (DL) models based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are common in medicine, they are less studied for parotid gland tumors. This study used a 2.5D imaging approach (Incorporating Inter-Slice Information) to train a DL model to differentiate between benign and malignant PGTs.

Methods: This retrospective study included 122 parotid tumor patients, using MRI and clinical features to build predictive models. In the traditional model, univariate analysis identified statistically significant features, which were then used in multivariate logistic regression to determine independent predictors. The model was built using four-fold cross-validation. The deep learning model was trained using 2D and 2.5D imaging approaches, with a transformer-based architecture employed for transfer learning. The model's performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and confusion matrix metrics.

Results: In the traditional model, boundary and peritumoral invasion were identified as independent predictors for PGTs, and the model was constructed based on these features. The model achieved an AUC of 0.79 but demonstrated low sensitivity (0.54). In contrast, the DL model based on 2.5D T2 fat-suppressed images showed superior performance, with an AUC of 0.86 and a sensitivity of 0.78.

Conclusion: The 2.5D imaging technique, when integrated with a transformer-based transfer learning model, demonstrates significant efficacy in differentiating between PGTs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信