自闭症与社交焦虑的共情特征比较研究。

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Autism Research Pub Date : 2025-06-19 DOI:10.1002/aur.70075
Sigal Tikochinsky, Esther Ben-Itzchak, Gil Zukerman
{"title":"自闭症与社交焦虑的共情特征比较研究。","authors":"Sigal Tikochinsky,&nbsp;Esther Ben-Itzchak,&nbsp;Gil Zukerman","doi":"10.1002/aur.70075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examined cognitive and affective empathy in individuals with autism spectrum condition (ASC), social anxiety (SA), and those without these conditions. A total of 105 university students (mean age = 24.2 years) were divided into three groups: ASC (<i>n</i> = 34), SA (<i>n</i> = 38), and controls (<i>n</i> = 33). Participants completed the Social Responsiveness Scale-2 (SRS-2), Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS), and Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) to assess cognitive (fantasy, perspective taking) and affective (personal distress, empathic concern) empathy. State cognitive empathy was measured using the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task (RMET). Results showed that the ASC group had lower empathic concern than the SA and control groups and lower perspective taking than controls. Both ASC and SA groups reported higher personal distress than controls. A novel personal distress-to-empathic concern ratio (PD/EC) effectively differentiated ASC from SA, with a proposed cutoff of 0.83, demonstrating good sensitivity and moderate specificity. RMET scores were within the norm for all groups, with no significant differences. These findings highlight distinct empathy profiles in autism and social anxiety and introduce a new metric for differentiation, with potential clinical and research applications in empathy assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":131,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research","volume":"18 8","pages":"1620-1629"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aur.70075","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinct Empathy Profiles in Autism and Social Anxiety: A Comparative Study\",\"authors\":\"Sigal Tikochinsky,&nbsp;Esther Ben-Itzchak,&nbsp;Gil Zukerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aur.70075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study examined cognitive and affective empathy in individuals with autism spectrum condition (ASC), social anxiety (SA), and those without these conditions. A total of 105 university students (mean age = 24.2 years) were divided into three groups: ASC (<i>n</i> = 34), SA (<i>n</i> = 38), and controls (<i>n</i> = 33). Participants completed the Social Responsiveness Scale-2 (SRS-2), Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS), and Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) to assess cognitive (fantasy, perspective taking) and affective (personal distress, empathic concern) empathy. State cognitive empathy was measured using the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task (RMET). Results showed that the ASC group had lower empathic concern than the SA and control groups and lower perspective taking than controls. Both ASC and SA groups reported higher personal distress than controls. A novel personal distress-to-empathic concern ratio (PD/EC) effectively differentiated ASC from SA, with a proposed cutoff of 0.83, demonstrating good sensitivity and moderate specificity. RMET scores were within the norm for all groups, with no significant differences. These findings highlight distinct empathy profiles in autism and social anxiety and introduce a new metric for differentiation, with potential clinical and research applications in empathy assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Autism Research\",\"volume\":\"18 8\",\"pages\":\"1620-1629\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aur.70075\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Autism Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aur.70075\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aur.70075","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了自闭症谱系条件(ASC)、社交焦虑(SA)和无这些条件的个体的认知和情感共情。105名大学生(平均年龄24.2岁)分为三组:ASC组(n = 34)、SA组(n = 38)和对照组(n = 33)。参与者通过社会反应性量表-2 (SRS-2)、Liebowitz社会焦虑量表(LSAS)和人际反应指数(IRI)来评估认知共情(幻想、视角)和情感共情(个人痛苦、共情关怀)。状态认知共情采用眼读心任务(RMET)进行测量。结果表明,ASC组的共情关注低于SA组和对照组,视角采取低于对照组。ASC组和SA组报告的个人痛苦程度都高于对照组。一个新的个人痛苦-共情关注比(PD/EC)有效地区分了ASC和SA,建议的截止值为0.83,具有良好的敏感性和中等的特异性。RMET分数在所有组的标准范围内,没有显著差异。这些发现突出了自闭症和社交焦虑患者的不同共情特征,并引入了一种新的区分指标,在共情评估中具有潜在的临床和研究应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Distinct Empathy Profiles in Autism and Social Anxiety: A Comparative Study

Distinct Empathy Profiles in Autism and Social Anxiety: A Comparative Study

This study examined cognitive and affective empathy in individuals with autism spectrum condition (ASC), social anxiety (SA), and those without these conditions. A total of 105 university students (mean age = 24.2 years) were divided into three groups: ASC (n = 34), SA (n = 38), and controls (n = 33). Participants completed the Social Responsiveness Scale-2 (SRS-2), Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS), and Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) to assess cognitive (fantasy, perspective taking) and affective (personal distress, empathic concern) empathy. State cognitive empathy was measured using the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task (RMET). Results showed that the ASC group had lower empathic concern than the SA and control groups and lower perspective taking than controls. Both ASC and SA groups reported higher personal distress than controls. A novel personal distress-to-empathic concern ratio (PD/EC) effectively differentiated ASC from SA, with a proposed cutoff of 0.83, demonstrating good sensitivity and moderate specificity. RMET scores were within the norm for all groups, with no significant differences. These findings highlight distinct empathy profiles in autism and social anxiety and introduce a new metric for differentiation, with potential clinical and research applications in empathy assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Autism Research
Autism Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
8.50%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AUTISM RESEARCH will cover the developmental disorders known as Pervasive Developmental Disorders (or autism spectrum disorders – ASDs). The Journal focuses on basic genetic, neurobiological and psychological mechanisms and how these influence developmental processes in ASDs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信