在篮子试验中引入历史信息,进一步提高贝叶斯信息的有效性。

IF 1.8 3区 数学 Q3 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Libby Daniells, Pavel Mozgunov, Helen Barnett, Alun Bedding, Thomas Jaki
{"title":"在篮子试验中引入历史信息,进一步提高贝叶斯信息的有效性。","authors":"Libby Daniells, Pavel Mozgunov, Helen Barnett, Alun Bedding, Thomas Jaki","doi":"10.1093/biostatistics/kxaf016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In basket trials a single therapeutic treatment is tested on several patient populations simultaneously, each of which forming a basket, where patients across all baskets on the trial share a common genetic aberration. These trials allow testing of treatments on small groups of patients, however, limited basket sample sizes can result in inadequate precision and power of estimates. It is well known that Bayesian information borrowing models such as the exchangeability-nonexchangeability (EXNEX) model can be implemented to tackle such a problem, drawing on information from one basket when making inference in another. An alternative approach to improve power of estimates, is to incorporate any historical or external information available. This paper considers models that amalgamate both forms of information borrowing, allowing borrowing between baskets in the ongoing trial whilst also drawing on response data from historical sources, with the aim to further improve treatment effect estimates. We propose several Bayesian information borrowing approaches that incorporate historical information into the model. These methods are data-driven, updating the degree of borrowing based on the level of homogeneity between information sources. A thorough simulation study is presented to draw comparisons between the proposed approaches, whilst also comparing to the standard EXNEX model in which no historical information is utilized. The models are also applied to a real-life trial example to demonstrate their performance in practice. We show that the incorporation of historic data under the novel approaches can lead to a substantial improvement in precision and power of treatment effect estimates when such data is homogeneous to the responses in the ongoing trial. Under some approaches, this came alongside an inflation in type I error rate in cases of heterogeneity. However, the use of a power prior in the EXNEX model is shown to increase power and precision, whilst maintaining similar error rates to the standard EXNEX model.</p>","PeriodicalId":55357,"journal":{"name":"Biostatistics","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incorporating historic information to further improve power when conducting Bayesian information borrowing in basket trials.\",\"authors\":\"Libby Daniells, Pavel Mozgunov, Helen Barnett, Alun Bedding, Thomas Jaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/biostatistics/kxaf016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In basket trials a single therapeutic treatment is tested on several patient populations simultaneously, each of which forming a basket, where patients across all baskets on the trial share a common genetic aberration. These trials allow testing of treatments on small groups of patients, however, limited basket sample sizes can result in inadequate precision and power of estimates. It is well known that Bayesian information borrowing models such as the exchangeability-nonexchangeability (EXNEX) model can be implemented to tackle such a problem, drawing on information from one basket when making inference in another. An alternative approach to improve power of estimates, is to incorporate any historical or external information available. This paper considers models that amalgamate both forms of information borrowing, allowing borrowing between baskets in the ongoing trial whilst also drawing on response data from historical sources, with the aim to further improve treatment effect estimates. We propose several Bayesian information borrowing approaches that incorporate historical information into the model. These methods are data-driven, updating the degree of borrowing based on the level of homogeneity between information sources. A thorough simulation study is presented to draw comparisons between the proposed approaches, whilst also comparing to the standard EXNEX model in which no historical information is utilized. The models are also applied to a real-life trial example to demonstrate their performance in practice. We show that the incorporation of historic data under the novel approaches can lead to a substantial improvement in precision and power of treatment effect estimates when such data is homogeneous to the responses in the ongoing trial. Under some approaches, this came alongside an inflation in type I error rate in cases of heterogeneity. However, the use of a power prior in the EXNEX model is shown to increase power and precision, whilst maintaining similar error rates to the standard EXNEX model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biostatistics\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biostatistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxaf016\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biostatistics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxaf016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在篮子试验中,一种治疗方法同时在几个患者群体中进行测试,每个患者群体形成一个篮子,所有篮子中的患者都有共同的遗传畸变。这些试验允许在小组患者中测试治疗方法,然而,有限的篮子样本量可能导致估计的精度和效力不足。众所周知,贝叶斯信息借用模型,如可交换性-不可交换性(EXNEX)模型可以实现来解决这样的问题,从一个篮子中提取信息,同时在另一个篮子中进行推理。另一种改进估计能力的方法是合并任何可用的历史或外部信息。本文考虑了合并两种形式的信息借鉴的模型,允许在正在进行的试验中在篮子之间进行借鉴,同时也利用来自历史来源的响应数据,目的是进一步改善治疗效果的估计。我们提出了几种将历史信息纳入模型的贝叶斯信息借用方法。这些方法是数据驱动的,基于信息源之间的同质性水平来更新借阅程度。提出了一个彻底的仿真研究来比较所提出的方法,同时也比较了没有使用历史信息的标准EXNEX模型。并将该模型应用于一个实际的试验实例,以验证其在实践中的性能。我们表明,当这些数据与正在进行的试验中的反应一致时,在新方法下合并历史数据可以导致治疗效果估计的精度和能力的实质性提高。在某些方法下,这与异质性情况下的I类错误率膨胀同时发生。然而,在EXNEX模型中使用功率先验可以提高功率和精度,同时保持与标准EXNEX模型相似的错误率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incorporating historic information to further improve power when conducting Bayesian information borrowing in basket trials.

In basket trials a single therapeutic treatment is tested on several patient populations simultaneously, each of which forming a basket, where patients across all baskets on the trial share a common genetic aberration. These trials allow testing of treatments on small groups of patients, however, limited basket sample sizes can result in inadequate precision and power of estimates. It is well known that Bayesian information borrowing models such as the exchangeability-nonexchangeability (EXNEX) model can be implemented to tackle such a problem, drawing on information from one basket when making inference in another. An alternative approach to improve power of estimates, is to incorporate any historical or external information available. This paper considers models that amalgamate both forms of information borrowing, allowing borrowing between baskets in the ongoing trial whilst also drawing on response data from historical sources, with the aim to further improve treatment effect estimates. We propose several Bayesian information borrowing approaches that incorporate historical information into the model. These methods are data-driven, updating the degree of borrowing based on the level of homogeneity between information sources. A thorough simulation study is presented to draw comparisons between the proposed approaches, whilst also comparing to the standard EXNEX model in which no historical information is utilized. The models are also applied to a real-life trial example to demonstrate their performance in practice. We show that the incorporation of historic data under the novel approaches can lead to a substantial improvement in precision and power of treatment effect estimates when such data is homogeneous to the responses in the ongoing trial. Under some approaches, this came alongside an inflation in type I error rate in cases of heterogeneity. However, the use of a power prior in the EXNEX model is shown to increase power and precision, whilst maintaining similar error rates to the standard EXNEX model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biostatistics
Biostatistics 生物-数学与计算生物学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Among the important scientific developments of the 20th century is the explosive growth in statistical reasoning and methods for application to studies of human health. Examples include developments in likelihood methods for inference, epidemiologic statistics, clinical trials, survival analysis, and statistical genetics. Substantive problems in public health and biomedical research have fueled the development of statistical methods, which in turn have improved our ability to draw valid inferences from data. The objective of Biostatistics is to advance statistical science and its application to problems of human health and disease, with the ultimate goal of advancing the public''s health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信