评估普遍自杀筛查的公平性:筛查接受度和结果的种族/民族差异。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Richelle L Clifton, Kate Beemer, Marybelle Camacho, Molly C Adrian
{"title":"评估普遍自杀筛查的公平性:筛查接受度和结果的种族/民族差异。","authors":"Richelle L Clifton, Kate Beemer, Marybelle Camacho, Molly C Adrian","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Youth suicide is a critical public health issue. Universal screening in healthcare settings can provide clinical pathways for early identification of suicide risk by assessing suicidal thoughts and behaviors and connection to care. This study aimed to examine whether participation in universal suicide risk screening varies by demographic factors, including race/ethnicity, given documented disparities in suicide rates across racial/ethnic groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient responses on the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ), demographics, and service use factor data were drawn from patient medical records for ambulatory and acute care visits within a large children's hospital system between 6/1/21, and 9/12/23, for patients aged 10 and above who presented for in-person visits in an eligible clinic and were asked to complete a suicide risk screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>160,228 visits for patients between ages 10-25 (M<sub>age</sub>=14.35) were included in final analyses. Screening was accepted in 76.95% of visits, and of those screens, 15.87% were positive. After controlling for within-patient correlations, race/ethnicity, sex, and age were significant predictors of screening acceptance and result. White and Latine youth were more likely to accept screening, whereas youth of other races/ethnicities, including Asian and Black youth, were less likely to accept screening. White and Multiracial youth were more likely to screen positive, whereas Latine, Asian, and Pacific Islander youth were less likely to screen positive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Racial/ethnic differences in screening acceptance and results indicate disparities in suicide risk identification among youth. More work is needed to understand factors impacting engagement in screening and to ensure equitable suicide risk identification.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"107945"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Equity in Universal Suicide Screening: Race/Ethnic Differences in Screening Acceptance and Results.\",\"authors\":\"Richelle L Clifton, Kate Beemer, Marybelle Camacho, Molly C Adrian\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Youth suicide is a critical public health issue. Universal screening in healthcare settings can provide clinical pathways for early identification of suicide risk by assessing suicidal thoughts and behaviors and connection to care. This study aimed to examine whether participation in universal suicide risk screening varies by demographic factors, including race/ethnicity, given documented disparities in suicide rates across racial/ethnic groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient responses on the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ), demographics, and service use factor data were drawn from patient medical records for ambulatory and acute care visits within a large children's hospital system between 6/1/21, and 9/12/23, for patients aged 10 and above who presented for in-person visits in an eligible clinic and were asked to complete a suicide risk screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>160,228 visits for patients between ages 10-25 (M<sub>age</sub>=14.35) were included in final analyses. Screening was accepted in 76.95% of visits, and of those screens, 15.87% were positive. After controlling for within-patient correlations, race/ethnicity, sex, and age were significant predictors of screening acceptance and result. White and Latine youth were more likely to accept screening, whereas youth of other races/ethnicities, including Asian and Black youth, were less likely to accept screening. White and Multiracial youth were more likely to screen positive, whereas Latine, Asian, and Pacific Islander youth were less likely to screen positive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Racial/ethnic differences in screening acceptance and results indicate disparities in suicide risk identification among youth. More work is needed to understand factors impacting engagement in screening and to ensure equitable suicide risk identification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"107945\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107945\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107945","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

青少年自杀是一个严重的公共卫生问题。医疗机构的普遍筛查可以通过评估自杀想法和行为以及与护理的联系,为早期识别自杀风险提供临床途径。本研究旨在考察普遍自杀风险筛查的参与是否因人口统计学因素而异,包括种族/民族,鉴于记录在案的不同种族/民族的自杀率差异。方法:从21年6月1日至23年9月12日期间在一家大型儿童医院系统内门诊和急症护理就诊的患者病历中提取患者对自杀筛查问题(ASQ)、人口统计学和服务使用因素的回答,这些患者年龄在10岁及以上,在符合条件的诊所进行了亲自就诊,并被要求完成自杀风险筛查。结果:最终分析纳入了160228例年龄在10-25岁之间的患者(Mage=14.35)。76.95%的患者接受筛查,其中15.87%为阳性。在控制了患者内部相关性后,种族/民族、性别和年龄是筛查接受度和结果的重要预测因素。白人和拉丁裔青年更有可能接受筛查,而其他种族/民族的青年,包括亚洲和黑人青年,不太可能接受筛查。白人和多种族青年更有可能筛查出阳性,而拉丁裔、亚裔和太平洋岛民青年则不太可能筛查出阳性。结论:种族/民族在筛查接受度和结果上的差异表明了青少年自杀风险识别的差异。需要做更多的工作来了解影响参与筛查的因素,并确保公平地识别自杀风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Equity in Universal Suicide Screening: Race/Ethnic Differences in Screening Acceptance and Results.

Introduction: Youth suicide is a critical public health issue. Universal screening in healthcare settings can provide clinical pathways for early identification of suicide risk by assessing suicidal thoughts and behaviors and connection to care. This study aimed to examine whether participation in universal suicide risk screening varies by demographic factors, including race/ethnicity, given documented disparities in suicide rates across racial/ethnic groups.

Methods: Patient responses on the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ), demographics, and service use factor data were drawn from patient medical records for ambulatory and acute care visits within a large children's hospital system between 6/1/21, and 9/12/23, for patients aged 10 and above who presented for in-person visits in an eligible clinic and were asked to complete a suicide risk screening.

Results: 160,228 visits for patients between ages 10-25 (Mage=14.35) were included in final analyses. Screening was accepted in 76.95% of visits, and of those screens, 15.87% were positive. After controlling for within-patient correlations, race/ethnicity, sex, and age were significant predictors of screening acceptance and result. White and Latine youth were more likely to accept screening, whereas youth of other races/ethnicities, including Asian and Black youth, were less likely to accept screening. White and Multiracial youth were more likely to screen positive, whereas Latine, Asian, and Pacific Islander youth were less likely to screen positive.

Conclusions: Racial/ethnic differences in screening acceptance and results indicate disparities in suicide risk identification among youth. More work is needed to understand factors impacting engagement in screening and to ensure equitable suicide risk identification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Preventive Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
395
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health. Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信