Tiffany H Xie, Monica E Peek, Corey E Tabit, Elizabeth L Tung
{"title":"芝加哥低收入住房税收抵免对种族与高血压关系的调节作用。","authors":"Tiffany H Xie, Monica E Peek, Corey E Tabit, Elizabeth L Tung","doi":"10.1007/s11524-025-00983-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While there is growing awareness of discriminatory housing policies and their adverse impacts on health, little is known about how housing policy may promote health equity. We focused on the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), the largest affordable housing program in the United States, and examined how living in neighborhoods with LIHTC housing may moderate associations between elevated blood pressure and race/ethnicity in Chicago, IL. A retrospective cohort included 15,339 adult patients at an academic medical center from 2018 to 2019. We used mixed-effects hierarchal logistic regression models to examine elevated blood pressure (diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg or systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg) as a function of race/ethnicity, LIHTC, and race/ethnicity-LIHTC interaction effects, adjusting for patient- and neighborhood-level covariates. A majority were female (63.2%) and non-Hispanic Black (57.6%), with an average age of 50.2 years (SD 19.1). One in ten (9.9%) patients lived in a census tract with LIHTC. Overall, Black patients had 2.52 times the adjusted odds of elevated blood pressure compared to White patients (95% CI = 2.25-2.82). In models examining the moderating effects of LIHTC, the odds ratio of hypertension in Black patients vs. White patients was reduced from 2.62 to 1.52, representing a 67.9% reduction in the difference between Black and White patients. Notably, Black patients, who have been disproportionately impacted by discriminatory housing policies, were the only group found to have moderating effects associated with LIHTC. Housing policies may mitigate neighborhood effects associated with racial disparity, possibly supporting efforts to achieve health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":49964,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"520-529"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12279677/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moderating Effects of the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit on Associations Between Race and Elevated Blood Pressure in Chicago.\",\"authors\":\"Tiffany H Xie, Monica E Peek, Corey E Tabit, Elizabeth L Tung\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11524-025-00983-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While there is growing awareness of discriminatory housing policies and their adverse impacts on health, little is known about how housing policy may promote health equity. We focused on the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), the largest affordable housing program in the United States, and examined how living in neighborhoods with LIHTC housing may moderate associations between elevated blood pressure and race/ethnicity in Chicago, IL. A retrospective cohort included 15,339 adult patients at an academic medical center from 2018 to 2019. We used mixed-effects hierarchal logistic regression models to examine elevated blood pressure (diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg or systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg) as a function of race/ethnicity, LIHTC, and race/ethnicity-LIHTC interaction effects, adjusting for patient- and neighborhood-level covariates. A majority were female (63.2%) and non-Hispanic Black (57.6%), with an average age of 50.2 years (SD 19.1). One in ten (9.9%) patients lived in a census tract with LIHTC. Overall, Black patients had 2.52 times the adjusted odds of elevated blood pressure compared to White patients (95% CI = 2.25-2.82). In models examining the moderating effects of LIHTC, the odds ratio of hypertension in Black patients vs. White patients was reduced from 2.62 to 1.52, representing a 67.9% reduction in the difference between Black and White patients. Notably, Black patients, who have been disproportionately impacted by discriminatory housing policies, were the only group found to have moderating effects associated with LIHTC. Housing policies may mitigate neighborhood effects associated with racial disparity, possibly supporting efforts to achieve health equity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"520-529\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12279677/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-025-00983-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-025-00983-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
虽然人们越来越认识到歧视性住房政策及其对健康的不利影响,但对住房政策如何促进健康公平却知之甚少。我们关注的是低收入住房税收抵免(LIHTC),这是美国最大的经济适用房计划,并研究了居住在LIHTC住房社区如何缓和伊利诺伊州芝加哥血压升高与种族/民族之间的关联。回顾性队列包括2018年至2019年在学术医疗中心的15,339名成年患者。我们使用混合效应分层逻辑回归模型来检验血压升高(舒张压≥90 mmHg或收缩压≥140 mmHg)作为种族/民族、LIHTC和种族/民族-LIHTC相互作用效应的函数,并对患者和社区水平的协变量进行调整。大多数为女性(63.2%)和非西班牙裔黑人(57.6%),平均年龄50.2岁(SD 19.1)。十分之一(9.9%)的患者生活在患有LIHTC的人口普查区。总体而言,黑人患者血压升高的调整几率是白人患者的2.52倍(95% CI = 2.25-2.82)。在检查LIHTC调节作用的模型中,黑人患者与白人患者高血压的比值比从2.62降至1.52,黑人与白人患者之间的差异降低了67.9%。值得注意的是,受到歧视性住房政策不成比例影响的黑人患者是唯一发现与LIHTC相关的缓和效应的群体。住房政策可以减轻与种族差异有关的邻里效应,可能有助于实现卫生公平。
Moderating Effects of the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit on Associations Between Race and Elevated Blood Pressure in Chicago.
While there is growing awareness of discriminatory housing policies and their adverse impacts on health, little is known about how housing policy may promote health equity. We focused on the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), the largest affordable housing program in the United States, and examined how living in neighborhoods with LIHTC housing may moderate associations between elevated blood pressure and race/ethnicity in Chicago, IL. A retrospective cohort included 15,339 adult patients at an academic medical center from 2018 to 2019. We used mixed-effects hierarchal logistic regression models to examine elevated blood pressure (diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg or systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg) as a function of race/ethnicity, LIHTC, and race/ethnicity-LIHTC interaction effects, adjusting for patient- and neighborhood-level covariates. A majority were female (63.2%) and non-Hispanic Black (57.6%), with an average age of 50.2 years (SD 19.1). One in ten (9.9%) patients lived in a census tract with LIHTC. Overall, Black patients had 2.52 times the adjusted odds of elevated blood pressure compared to White patients (95% CI = 2.25-2.82). In models examining the moderating effects of LIHTC, the odds ratio of hypertension in Black patients vs. White patients was reduced from 2.62 to 1.52, representing a 67.9% reduction in the difference between Black and White patients. Notably, Black patients, who have been disproportionately impacted by discriminatory housing policies, were the only group found to have moderating effects associated with LIHTC. Housing policies may mitigate neighborhood effects associated with racial disparity, possibly supporting efforts to achieve health equity.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Urban Health is the premier and authoritative source of rigorous analyses to advance the health and well-being of people in cities. The Journal provides a platform for interdisciplinary exploration of the evidence base for the broader determinants of health and health inequities needed to strengthen policies, programs, and governance for urban health.
The Journal publishes original data, case studies, commentaries, book reviews, executive summaries of selected reports, and proceedings from important global meetings. It welcomes submissions presenting new analytic methods, including systems science approaches to urban problem solving. Finally, the Journal provides a forum linking scholars, practitioners, civil society, and policy makers from the multiple sectors that can influence the health of urban populations.