Lea-Fedia Rissmann, Brent James Raiteri, Wolfgang Seiberl, Tobias Siebert, Daniel Hahn
{"title":"拉伸-缩短循环效应与皮质或脊髓兴奋性调节无关。","authors":"Lea-Fedia Rissmann, Brent James Raiteri, Wolfgang Seiberl, Tobias Siebert, Daniel Hahn","doi":"10.1113/JP287508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is unclear whether cortical and spinal excitability modulations contribute to enhanced stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) performance. Therefore, this study investigated cortical and spinal excitability modulations during and following shortening of SSC contractions compared with pure shortening (SHO) contractions. Participants (n = 18) performed submaximal voluntary plantar flexion contractions while prone on the dynamometer bench. The right foot was strapped onto the dynamometer's footplate attachment, and the resultant ankle joint torque and crank arm angle were recorded. Cortical and spinal excitability modulations of the soleus muscle were analysed by eliciting compound muscle actional potentials via electrical nerve stimulation, cervicomedullary motor-evoked potentials (CMEPs) via electrical stimulation of the spinal cord, and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) via magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex. Mean torque following stretch was significantly increased by 7 ± 3% (P = 0.029) compared with the fixed-end reference (REF) contraction, and mean torque during shortening of SSC compared with SHO was significantly increased by 12 ± 24% (P = 0.046). Mean steady-state torque was significantly lower by 13 ± 3% (P = 0.006) and 9 ± 12% (P = 0.011) following SSC compared with REF and SHO, respectively. Mean steady-state torque was not significantly different following SHO compared with REF (7 ± 8%, P = 0.456). CMEPs and MEPs were also not significantly different during shortening of SSC compared with SHO (P ≥ 0.885) or during the steady state of SSC, SHO and REF (P ≥ 0.727). Therefore, our results indicate that SSC performance was not associated with cortical or spinal excitability modulations during or after shortening, but rather driven by mechanical mechanisms triggered during active stretch. KEY POINTS: A stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) effect of 12% was observed during EMG-matched submaximal voluntary contractions of the human plantar flexors. The SSC effect was neither associated with cortical or spinal excitability modulations nor with stretch-reflex activity. The SSC effect was likely driven by mechanical mechanisms related to active muscle stretch, which have long-lasting effects during shortening. Residual force depression following SSC was not attenuated by the long-lasting mechanical mechanisms triggered during active muscle stretch. Steady-state torques were lower following shortening of SSCs versus pure shortening and fixed-end contractions at the same final ankle joint angle, but the torque differences were not correlated with cortical or spinal excitability modulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-London","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The stretch-shortening cycle effect is not associated with cortical or spinal excitability modulations.\",\"authors\":\"Lea-Fedia Rissmann, Brent James Raiteri, Wolfgang Seiberl, Tobias Siebert, Daniel Hahn\",\"doi\":\"10.1113/JP287508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>It is unclear whether cortical and spinal excitability modulations contribute to enhanced stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) performance. Therefore, this study investigated cortical and spinal excitability modulations during and following shortening of SSC contractions compared with pure shortening (SHO) contractions. Participants (n = 18) performed submaximal voluntary plantar flexion contractions while prone on the dynamometer bench. The right foot was strapped onto the dynamometer's footplate attachment, and the resultant ankle joint torque and crank arm angle were recorded. Cortical and spinal excitability modulations of the soleus muscle were analysed by eliciting compound muscle actional potentials via electrical nerve stimulation, cervicomedullary motor-evoked potentials (CMEPs) via electrical stimulation of the spinal cord, and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) via magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex. Mean torque following stretch was significantly increased by 7 ± 3% (P = 0.029) compared with the fixed-end reference (REF) contraction, and mean torque during shortening of SSC compared with SHO was significantly increased by 12 ± 24% (P = 0.046). Mean steady-state torque was significantly lower by 13 ± 3% (P = 0.006) and 9 ± 12% (P = 0.011) following SSC compared with REF and SHO, respectively. Mean steady-state torque was not significantly different following SHO compared with REF (7 ± 8%, P = 0.456). CMEPs and MEPs were also not significantly different during shortening of SSC compared with SHO (P ≥ 0.885) or during the steady state of SSC, SHO and REF (P ≥ 0.727). Therefore, our results indicate that SSC performance was not associated with cortical or spinal excitability modulations during or after shortening, but rather driven by mechanical mechanisms triggered during active stretch. KEY POINTS: A stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) effect of 12% was observed during EMG-matched submaximal voluntary contractions of the human plantar flexors. The SSC effect was neither associated with cortical or spinal excitability modulations nor with stretch-reflex activity. The SSC effect was likely driven by mechanical mechanisms related to active muscle stretch, which have long-lasting effects during shortening. Residual force depression following SSC was not attenuated by the long-lasting mechanical mechanisms triggered during active muscle stretch. Steady-state torques were lower following shortening of SSCs versus pure shortening and fixed-end contractions at the same final ankle joint angle, but the torque differences were not correlated with cortical or spinal excitability modulations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physiology-London\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physiology-London\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1113/JP287508\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-London","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/JP287508","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The stretch-shortening cycle effect is not associated with cortical or spinal excitability modulations.
It is unclear whether cortical and spinal excitability modulations contribute to enhanced stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) performance. Therefore, this study investigated cortical and spinal excitability modulations during and following shortening of SSC contractions compared with pure shortening (SHO) contractions. Participants (n = 18) performed submaximal voluntary plantar flexion contractions while prone on the dynamometer bench. The right foot was strapped onto the dynamometer's footplate attachment, and the resultant ankle joint torque and crank arm angle were recorded. Cortical and spinal excitability modulations of the soleus muscle were analysed by eliciting compound muscle actional potentials via electrical nerve stimulation, cervicomedullary motor-evoked potentials (CMEPs) via electrical stimulation of the spinal cord, and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) via magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex. Mean torque following stretch was significantly increased by 7 ± 3% (P = 0.029) compared with the fixed-end reference (REF) contraction, and mean torque during shortening of SSC compared with SHO was significantly increased by 12 ± 24% (P = 0.046). Mean steady-state torque was significantly lower by 13 ± 3% (P = 0.006) and 9 ± 12% (P = 0.011) following SSC compared with REF and SHO, respectively. Mean steady-state torque was not significantly different following SHO compared with REF (7 ± 8%, P = 0.456). CMEPs and MEPs were also not significantly different during shortening of SSC compared with SHO (P ≥ 0.885) or during the steady state of SSC, SHO and REF (P ≥ 0.727). Therefore, our results indicate that SSC performance was not associated with cortical or spinal excitability modulations during or after shortening, but rather driven by mechanical mechanisms triggered during active stretch. KEY POINTS: A stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) effect of 12% was observed during EMG-matched submaximal voluntary contractions of the human plantar flexors. The SSC effect was neither associated with cortical or spinal excitability modulations nor with stretch-reflex activity. The SSC effect was likely driven by mechanical mechanisms related to active muscle stretch, which have long-lasting effects during shortening. Residual force depression following SSC was not attenuated by the long-lasting mechanical mechanisms triggered during active muscle stretch. Steady-state torques were lower following shortening of SSCs versus pure shortening and fixed-end contractions at the same final ankle joint angle, but the torque differences were not correlated with cortical or spinal excitability modulations.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Physiology publishes full-length original Research Papers and Techniques for Physiology, which are short papers aimed at disseminating new techniques for physiological research. Articles solicited by the Editorial Board include Perspectives, Symposium Reports and Topical Reviews, which highlight areas of special physiological interest. CrossTalk articles are short editorial-style invited articles framing a debate between experts in the field on controversial topics. Letters to the Editor and Journal Club articles are also published. All categories of papers are subjected to peer reivew.
The Journal of Physiology welcomes submitted research papers in all areas of physiology. Authors should present original work that illustrates new physiological principles or mechanisms. Papers on work at the molecular level, at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs and on systems physiology are all acceptable. Theoretical papers and papers that use computational models to further our understanding of physiological processes will be considered if based on experimentally derived data and if the hypothesis advanced is directly amenable to experimental testing. While emphasis is on human and mammalian physiology, work on lower vertebrate or invertebrate preparations may be suitable if it furthers the understanding of the functioning of other organisms including mammals.