抗割伤防护手套的人体工程学标准和可用性测试:实验研究。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sahar Heydarnia, Mahdi Jalali, Saied Sabzehali, Majid Zarrin, Ehsanollah Habibi
{"title":"抗割伤防护手套的人体工程学标准和可用性测试:实验研究。","authors":"Sahar Heydarnia, Mahdi Jalali, Saied Sabzehali, Majid Zarrin, Ehsanollah Habibi","doi":"10.23749/mdl.v116i3.16641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although hand and arm injuries can be prevented with protective gloves, their use may reduce hand dexterity and muscle strength. This study examined the ergonomic criteria and usability of four cut-resistant protective gloves (CRPGs) types to identify the optimal glove choice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this experimental study, 22 male participants were tested under five conditions: barehanded, wearing nitrile-coated gloves, gel-coated gloves, material-coated gloves, and foam nitrile-coated gloves. Dexterity was assessed using the Bennett and O'Connor tests; grip and pinch force were measured with a dynamometer, and a goniometer assessed the range of motion. The gloves' usability was evaluated through the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire. At the same time, localized discomfort in different areas of the hand was assessed using the Local Perceived Discomfort (LPD) questionnaire. Finally, glove comparisons were made using appropriate statistical tests analyzed with SPSS version 24 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All examined CRPGs significantly lowered finger dexterity scores (p < 0.001). However, the effects of different gloves on hand dexterity varied. Wearing all four gloves reduced grip force, but statistically significant differences in grip force were noted only between the barehanded condition and Glove B (p = 0.004). Using all four gloves increased pinch force, though this increase was statistically significant only between the barehanded condition and Glove D (p = 0.005). Wearing all gloves caused a statistically significant reduction in wrist, palm, and finger range of motion compared to the barehanded condition (p < 0.005). Lastly, there was a significant statistical difference between the gloves regarding usability (p = 0.001) and LPD (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CRPGs can greatly influence hand skills. Glove D, featuring a foam nitrile coating, exhibited the highest finger dexterity compared to the other gloves studied. Considering aspects like sweat resistance and anatomical design, this foam nitrile-coated glove is appropriate for cutting-resistant tasks within various industries.</p>","PeriodicalId":49833,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Del Lavoro","volume":"116 3","pages":"16641"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12199023/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ergonomic Criteria and Usability Testing of Cut-Resistant Protective Gloves: An Experimental Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sahar Heydarnia, Mahdi Jalali, Saied Sabzehali, Majid Zarrin, Ehsanollah Habibi\",\"doi\":\"10.23749/mdl.v116i3.16641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although hand and arm injuries can be prevented with protective gloves, their use may reduce hand dexterity and muscle strength. This study examined the ergonomic criteria and usability of four cut-resistant protective gloves (CRPGs) types to identify the optimal glove choice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this experimental study, 22 male participants were tested under five conditions: barehanded, wearing nitrile-coated gloves, gel-coated gloves, material-coated gloves, and foam nitrile-coated gloves. Dexterity was assessed using the Bennett and O'Connor tests; grip and pinch force were measured with a dynamometer, and a goniometer assessed the range of motion. The gloves' usability was evaluated through the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire. At the same time, localized discomfort in different areas of the hand was assessed using the Local Perceived Discomfort (LPD) questionnaire. Finally, glove comparisons were made using appropriate statistical tests analyzed with SPSS version 24 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All examined CRPGs significantly lowered finger dexterity scores (p < 0.001). However, the effects of different gloves on hand dexterity varied. Wearing all four gloves reduced grip force, but statistically significant differences in grip force were noted only between the barehanded condition and Glove B (p = 0.004). Using all four gloves increased pinch force, though this increase was statistically significant only between the barehanded condition and Glove D (p = 0.005). Wearing all gloves caused a statistically significant reduction in wrist, palm, and finger range of motion compared to the barehanded condition (p < 0.005). Lastly, there was a significant statistical difference between the gloves regarding usability (p = 0.001) and LPD (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CRPGs can greatly influence hand skills. Glove D, featuring a foam nitrile coating, exhibited the highest finger dexterity compared to the other gloves studied. Considering aspects like sweat resistance and anatomical design, this foam nitrile-coated glove is appropriate for cutting-resistant tasks within various industries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina Del Lavoro\",\"volume\":\"116 3\",\"pages\":\"16641\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12199023/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina Del Lavoro\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v116i3.16641\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Del Lavoro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v116i3.16641","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然防护手套可以防止手部和手臂受伤,但使用防护手套可能会降低手部的灵活性和肌肉力量。本研究考察了四种抗割伤防护手套(crpg)类型的人体工程学标准和可用性,以确定最佳手套选择。方法:在本实验研究中,22名男性受试者分别在徒手、戴涂丁腈手套、涂凝胶手套、涂材料手套和泡沫涂丁腈手套五种情况下进行测试。使用Bennett和O'Connor测试评估灵活性;用测力仪测量握力和夹紧力,用测角仪评估运动范围。手套的可用性通过系统可用性量表(SUS)问卷进行评估。同时,采用局部感知不适感(LPD)问卷对手部不同区域的局部不适感进行评估。最后,采用SPSS version 24软件进行相应的统计检验进行手套比较。结果:所有检测的crpg均显著降低了手指灵巧性评分(p < 0.001)。然而,不同的手套对手灵巧的影响是不同的。戴上所有四副手套会减少握力,但只有在赤手和手套B组之间握力有统计学上的显著差异(p = 0.004)。使用所有四种手套都增加了捏力,尽管这种增加仅在赤手和手套D之间具有统计学意义(p = 0.005)。与赤手空拳相比,戴所有手套导致手腕、手掌和手指活动范围的统计学显著减少(p < 0.005)。最后,手套在可用性(p = 0.001)和LPD (p = 0.001)方面存在显著的统计差异。结论:crpg对手部技能有显著影响。与其他被研究的手套相比,具有泡沫腈涂层的手套D显示出最高的手指灵活性。考虑到防汗性和解剖设计等方面,这种泡沫腈涂层手套适用于各种行业的抗切割任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ergonomic Criteria and Usability Testing of Cut-Resistant Protective Gloves: An Experimental Study.

Ergonomic Criteria and Usability Testing of Cut-Resistant Protective Gloves: An Experimental Study.

Ergonomic Criteria and Usability Testing of Cut-Resistant Protective Gloves: An Experimental Study.

Ergonomic Criteria and Usability Testing of Cut-Resistant Protective Gloves: An Experimental Study.

Background: Although hand and arm injuries can be prevented with protective gloves, their use may reduce hand dexterity and muscle strength. This study examined the ergonomic criteria and usability of four cut-resistant protective gloves (CRPGs) types to identify the optimal glove choice.

Methods: In this experimental study, 22 male participants were tested under five conditions: barehanded, wearing nitrile-coated gloves, gel-coated gloves, material-coated gloves, and foam nitrile-coated gloves. Dexterity was assessed using the Bennett and O'Connor tests; grip and pinch force were measured with a dynamometer, and a goniometer assessed the range of motion. The gloves' usability was evaluated through the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire. At the same time, localized discomfort in different areas of the hand was assessed using the Local Perceived Discomfort (LPD) questionnaire. Finally, glove comparisons were made using appropriate statistical tests analyzed with SPSS version 24 software.

Results: All examined CRPGs significantly lowered finger dexterity scores (p < 0.001). However, the effects of different gloves on hand dexterity varied. Wearing all four gloves reduced grip force, but statistically significant differences in grip force were noted only between the barehanded condition and Glove B (p = 0.004). Using all four gloves increased pinch force, though this increase was statistically significant only between the barehanded condition and Glove D (p = 0.005). Wearing all gloves caused a statistically significant reduction in wrist, palm, and finger range of motion compared to the barehanded condition (p < 0.005). Lastly, there was a significant statistical difference between the gloves regarding usability (p = 0.001) and LPD (p = 0.001).

Conclusions: CRPGs can greatly influence hand skills. Glove D, featuring a foam nitrile coating, exhibited the highest finger dexterity compared to the other gloves studied. Considering aspects like sweat resistance and anatomical design, this foam nitrile-coated glove is appropriate for cutting-resistant tasks within various industries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina Del Lavoro
Medicina Del Lavoro 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: La Medicina del Lavoro is a bimonthly magazine founded in 1901 by L. Devoto, and then directed by L. Prieti, E. Vigliani, V. Foà, P.A. Bertazzi (Milan). Now directed by A. Mutti (Parma), the magazine is the official Journal of the Italian Society of Occupational Medicine (SIML), aimed at training and updating all professionals involved in prevention and cure of occupational diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信