萨斯喀彻温省的虚拟医疗服务:多方利益相关者对实施、适当性和评估的看法。

Q3 Medicine
Sarah-Marie Durr, Abd Alras, Stacey Lovo, Hamza Dani, Laureen McIntyre, Amy Zarzeczny, Paul Babyn, Scott J Adams, Ivar Mendez
{"title":"萨斯喀彻温省的虚拟医疗服务:多方利益相关者对实施、适当性和评估的看法。","authors":"Sarah-Marie Durr, Abd Alras, Stacey Lovo, Hamza Dani, Laureen McIntyre, Amy Zarzeczny, Paul Babyn, Scott J Adams, Ivar Mendez","doi":"10.1177/08404704251348858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to provide an update on patients', clinicians', and health administrators' experiences and perspectives on opportunities, barriers, and priorities for virtual care to inform health policy and planning as virtual care programs continue to mature and develop. Three surveys were developed and distributed in Saskatchewan, Canada. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-squared tests, and free-text responses were analyzed using thematic analysis. Chronic disease management and mental health disorders were identified as highly suitable for virtual care. Health administrators underscored cost savings and improved patient access as key advantages, though they lacked consistent frameworks to assess virtual care effectiveness. Key barriers included digital literacy, technology constraints, and compensation models not aligned with virtual service provision. Participants called for greater infrastructure investment, technical support, and integrated electronic platforms. These insights may inform policy and practice to strengthen virtual health delivery and support health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":39854,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Management Forum","volume":" ","pages":"8404704251348858"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual care delivery in Saskatchewan: Multi-stakeholder perspectives on implementation, appropriateness, and evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah-Marie Durr, Abd Alras, Stacey Lovo, Hamza Dani, Laureen McIntyre, Amy Zarzeczny, Paul Babyn, Scott J Adams, Ivar Mendez\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08404704251348858\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to provide an update on patients', clinicians', and health administrators' experiences and perspectives on opportunities, barriers, and priorities for virtual care to inform health policy and planning as virtual care programs continue to mature and develop. Three surveys were developed and distributed in Saskatchewan, Canada. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-squared tests, and free-text responses were analyzed using thematic analysis. Chronic disease management and mental health disorders were identified as highly suitable for virtual care. Health administrators underscored cost savings and improved patient access as key advantages, though they lacked consistent frameworks to assess virtual care effectiveness. Key barriers included digital literacy, technology constraints, and compensation models not aligned with virtual service provision. Participants called for greater infrastructure investment, technical support, and integrated electronic platforms. These insights may inform policy and practice to strengthen virtual health delivery and support health equity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare Management Forum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8404704251348858\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare Management Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704251348858\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Management Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704251348858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是提供患者、临床医生和卫生管理人员对虚拟医疗的机会、障碍和优先事项的最新经验和观点,以便在虚拟医疗项目不断成熟和发展的同时,为卫生政策和规划提供信息。在加拿大萨斯喀彻温省编制和分发了三份调查报告。定量数据采用描述性统计和卡方检验进行分析,自由文本回复采用专题分析进行分析。慢性病管理和精神健康障碍被确定为非常适合虚拟护理。卫生管理人员强调,节约成本和改善患者可及性是主要优势,尽管他们缺乏一致的框架来评估虚拟护理的有效性。主要障碍包括数字素养、技术限制和与虚拟服务提供不一致的补偿模式。与会者呼吁加大基础设施投资、技术支持和综合电子平台建设。这些见解可为加强虚拟卫生服务和支持卫生公平的政策和实践提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Virtual care delivery in Saskatchewan: Multi-stakeholder perspectives on implementation, appropriateness, and evaluation.

The purpose of this study was to provide an update on patients', clinicians', and health administrators' experiences and perspectives on opportunities, barriers, and priorities for virtual care to inform health policy and planning as virtual care programs continue to mature and develop. Three surveys were developed and distributed in Saskatchewan, Canada. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-squared tests, and free-text responses were analyzed using thematic analysis. Chronic disease management and mental health disorders were identified as highly suitable for virtual care. Health administrators underscored cost savings and improved patient access as key advantages, though they lacked consistent frameworks to assess virtual care effectiveness. Key barriers included digital literacy, technology constraints, and compensation models not aligned with virtual service provision. Participants called for greater infrastructure investment, technical support, and integrated electronic platforms. These insights may inform policy and practice to strengthen virtual health delivery and support health equity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare Management Forum
Healthcare Management Forum Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Healthcare Management Forum is the official journal of the Canadian College of Health Service Executives. It is the only peer-reviewed journal that covers issues related to advances in health services management, theory and practice in a Canadian context. The quality of its contributors, the rigorous review process and the leading-edge topics make it truly unique!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信