社交媒体在决定是否进入医师助理项目中起作用吗?

Q2 Health Professions
Patrick Heagey, Shannon Jackson, Anuradha Anu Mathur, Joy Moverley, Pauline Papapietro, Kathryn P Bell, Amanda Lois
{"title":"社交媒体在决定是否进入医师助理项目中起作用吗?","authors":"Patrick Heagey, Shannon Jackson, Anuradha Anu Mathur, Joy Moverley, Pauline Papapietro, Kathryn P Bell, Amanda Lois","doi":"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study examined how social media content from physician assistant (PA) programs influences students' attitudes and decisions regarding matriculation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 16-question anonymous survey was distributed via email to PA programs across the United States. Contact information from PA program Web sites was used to email faculty, encouraging distribution to PA students and recent graduates who matriculated between January 2021 and January 2024. The survey aimed to understand PA student demographics, social media usage patterns, and their influence on program matriculation decisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 374 PA students from 28 programs (11% of all programs) completed the survey, with an average age of 25.7 years. Social media played a minor role in students' enrollment decisions. Top factors were accreditation status, location and cost of living, and first-time Physician Assistant National Certifying Examination pass rate. While 51% were aware of their program's social media presence, over 75% reported it was \"not at all important\" in their decision. However, 366 students used social media at least 3 times a week, with Instagram, Facebook, and TikTok being the most visited platforms. The most impactful posts were \"Day in the Life of a PA student\" videos, clinical year curriculum, and classroom technology, while posts about preceptors and faculty were least impactful.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite frequent social media use, 78% of respondents indicated social media presence had little to no impact on their program choice. However, targeted social media posts, such as \"A Day in the Life of a PA Student\" could impact their decision-making process.</p>","PeriodicalId":39231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Social Media Have a Role in the Decision to Matriculate Into a Physician Assistant Program?\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Heagey, Shannon Jackson, Anuradha Anu Mathur, Joy Moverley, Pauline Papapietro, Kathryn P Bell, Amanda Lois\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study examined how social media content from physician assistant (PA) programs influences students' attitudes and decisions regarding matriculation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 16-question anonymous survey was distributed via email to PA programs across the United States. Contact information from PA program Web sites was used to email faculty, encouraging distribution to PA students and recent graduates who matriculated between January 2021 and January 2024. The survey aimed to understand PA student demographics, social media usage patterns, and their influence on program matriculation decisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 374 PA students from 28 programs (11% of all programs) completed the survey, with an average age of 25.7 years. Social media played a minor role in students' enrollment decisions. Top factors were accreditation status, location and cost of living, and first-time Physician Assistant National Certifying Examination pass rate. While 51% were aware of their program's social media presence, over 75% reported it was \\\"not at all important\\\" in their decision. However, 366 students used social media at least 3 times a week, with Instagram, Facebook, and TikTok being the most visited platforms. The most impactful posts were \\\"Day in the Life of a PA student\\\" videos, clinical year curriculum, and classroom technology, while posts about preceptors and faculty were least impactful.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite frequent social media use, 78% of respondents indicated social media presence had little to no impact on their program choice. However, targeted social media posts, such as \\\"A Day in the Life of a PA Student\\\" could impact their decision-making process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physician Assistant Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physician Assistant Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000684\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:本研究考察了来自医师助理(PA)项目的社交媒体内容如何影响学生对入学的态度和决定。方法:一份包含16个问题的匿名调查通过电子邮件分发给美国各地的PA项目。PA项目网站上的联系信息被用来给教员发电子邮件,鼓励分发给2021年1月至2024年1月之间入学的PA学生和应届毕业生。该调查旨在了解PA学生的人口统计、社交媒体使用模式,以及它们对项目入学决定的影响。结果:共有来自28个专业的374名PA学生(占所有专业的11%)完成了调查,平均年龄为25.7岁。社交媒体在学生的入学决定中扮演了次要角色。最重要的因素是认证状态、地点和生活成本,以及首次医师助理国家认证考试的通过率。虽然51%的人知道他们的项目在社交媒体上的存在,但超过75%的人表示,这在他们的决定中“一点也不重要”。然而,366名学生每周至少使用3次社交媒体,其中Instagram、Facebook和TikTok是访问量最大的平台。最有影响力的帖子是“一个私人助理学生的一天”视频、临床年度课程和课堂技术,而关于导师和教师的帖子影响力最小。讨论:尽管频繁使用社交媒体,78%的受访者表示社交媒体的存在对他们的节目选择几乎没有影响。然而,有针对性的社交媒体帖子,比如“PA学生的一天”,可能会影响他们的决策过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Social Media Have a Role in the Decision to Matriculate Into a Physician Assistant Program?

Introduction: This study examined how social media content from physician assistant (PA) programs influences students' attitudes and decisions regarding matriculation.

Methods: A 16-question anonymous survey was distributed via email to PA programs across the United States. Contact information from PA program Web sites was used to email faculty, encouraging distribution to PA students and recent graduates who matriculated between January 2021 and January 2024. The survey aimed to understand PA student demographics, social media usage patterns, and their influence on program matriculation decisions.

Results: A total of 374 PA students from 28 programs (11% of all programs) completed the survey, with an average age of 25.7 years. Social media played a minor role in students' enrollment decisions. Top factors were accreditation status, location and cost of living, and first-time Physician Assistant National Certifying Examination pass rate. While 51% were aware of their program's social media presence, over 75% reported it was "not at all important" in their decision. However, 366 students used social media at least 3 times a week, with Instagram, Facebook, and TikTok being the most visited platforms. The most impactful posts were "Day in the Life of a PA student" videos, clinical year curriculum, and classroom technology, while posts about preceptors and faculty were least impactful.

Discussion: Despite frequent social media use, 78% of respondents indicated social media presence had little to no impact on their program choice. However, targeted social media posts, such as "A Day in the Life of a PA Student" could impact their decision-making process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信