使用机器学习复制鼻外科手术笔记的现行程序术语代码分配。

Q2 Medicine
World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2024-05-28 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1002/wjo2.188
Christopher P Cheng, Ryan Sicard, Dragan Vujovic, Vikram Vasan, Chris Choi, David K Lerner, Alfred-Marc Iloreta
{"title":"使用机器学习复制鼻外科手术笔记的现行程序术语代码分配。","authors":"Christopher P Cheng, Ryan Sicard, Dragan Vujovic, Vikram Vasan, Chris Choi, David K Lerner, Alfred-Marc Iloreta","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Documentation and billing are important and time-consuming parts of an otolaryngologist's work. Given advancements in machine learning (ML), we evaluated the ability of ML algorithms to use operative notes to classify rhinology procedures by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) code. We aimed to assess the potential for ML to replicate rhinologists' completion of their administrative tasks.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Urban tertiary hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 594 operative notes from rhinological procedures across six CPT codes performed from 3/2017 to 4/2022 were collected from 22 otolaryngologists. Text was preprocessed and then vectorized using CountVectorizer (CV), term frequency-inverse document frequency, and Word2Vec. The Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression and Naïve Bayes (NB) algorithms were used to train and test models on operative notes. Model-classified CPT codes were compared to codes assigned by operating surgeons. Model performance was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), precision, recall, and F1-score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Performance varied across vectorizers and ML algorithms. Across all performance metrics, CV and NB was most overall the best combination of vectorizer and ML algorithm across CPT codes and produced the single best AUC, 0.984.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In otolaryngology applications, the performance of basic ML algorithms varies depending on the context in which they are used. All algorithms demonstrated their ability to classify CPT codes well as well as the potential for using ML to replicate rhinologists' completion of their administrative tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":"11 2","pages":"198-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12172127/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Replicating Current Procedural Terminology code assignment of rhinology operative notes using machine learning.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher P Cheng, Ryan Sicard, Dragan Vujovic, Vikram Vasan, Chris Choi, David K Lerner, Alfred-Marc Iloreta\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wjo2.188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Documentation and billing are important and time-consuming parts of an otolaryngologist's work. Given advancements in machine learning (ML), we evaluated the ability of ML algorithms to use operative notes to classify rhinology procedures by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) code. We aimed to assess the potential for ML to replicate rhinologists' completion of their administrative tasks.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Urban tertiary hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 594 operative notes from rhinological procedures across six CPT codes performed from 3/2017 to 4/2022 were collected from 22 otolaryngologists. Text was preprocessed and then vectorized using CountVectorizer (CV), term frequency-inverse document frequency, and Word2Vec. The Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression and Naïve Bayes (NB) algorithms were used to train and test models on operative notes. Model-classified CPT codes were compared to codes assigned by operating surgeons. Model performance was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), precision, recall, and F1-score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Performance varied across vectorizers and ML algorithms. Across all performance metrics, CV and NB was most overall the best combination of vectorizer and ML algorithm across CPT codes and produced the single best AUC, 0.984.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In otolaryngology applications, the performance of basic ML algorithms varies depending on the context in which they are used. All algorithms demonstrated their ability to classify CPT codes well as well as the potential for using ML to replicate rhinologists' completion of their administrative tasks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"198-206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12172127/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:文件和账单是耳鼻喉科医生工作中重要且耗时的部分。鉴于机器学习(ML)的进步,我们评估了ML算法使用手术笔记根据当前程序术语(CPT®)代码对鼻外科手术进行分类的能力。我们的目的是评估机器学习复制鼻医生完成其管理任务的潜力。研究设计:回顾性队列研究。单位:城市三级医院。方法:从22名耳鼻喉科医生那里收集2017年3月至2022年4月6个CPT代码中鼻外科手术的594份手术记录。对文本进行预处理,然后使用CountVectorizer (CV)、词频逆文档频率和Word2Vec对文本进行矢量化。使用决策树、支持向量机、逻辑回归和Naïve贝叶斯(NB)算法对手术笔记模型进行训练和测试。将模型分类的CPT代码与外科医生分配的代码进行比较。通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积(ROC-AUC)、准确率、召回率和f1评分来评估模型的性能。结果:不同矢量器和ML算法的性能不同。在所有性能指标中,CV和NB是CPT代码中矢量化器和ML算法的最佳组合,并产生最佳的单一AUC,为0.984。结论:在耳鼻喉科应用中,基本ML算法的性能取决于它们使用的上下文。所有算法都证明了它们对CPT代码进行分类的能力,以及使用ML复制鼻医生完成管理任务的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Replicating Current Procedural Terminology code assignment of rhinology operative notes using machine learning.

Objectives: Documentation and billing are important and time-consuming parts of an otolaryngologist's work. Given advancements in machine learning (ML), we evaluated the ability of ML algorithms to use operative notes to classify rhinology procedures by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) code. We aimed to assess the potential for ML to replicate rhinologists' completion of their administrative tasks.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Urban tertiary hospital.

Methods: A total of 594 operative notes from rhinological procedures across six CPT codes performed from 3/2017 to 4/2022 were collected from 22 otolaryngologists. Text was preprocessed and then vectorized using CountVectorizer (CV), term frequency-inverse document frequency, and Word2Vec. The Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression and Naïve Bayes (NB) algorithms were used to train and test models on operative notes. Model-classified CPT codes were compared to codes assigned by operating surgeons. Model performance was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), precision, recall, and F1-score.

Results: Performance varied across vectorizers and ML algorithms. Across all performance metrics, CV and NB was most overall the best combination of vectorizer and ML algorithm across CPT codes and produced the single best AUC, 0.984.

Conclusions: In otolaryngology applications, the performance of basic ML algorithms varies depending on the context in which they are used. All algorithms demonstrated their ability to classify CPT codes well as well as the potential for using ML to replicate rhinologists' completion of their administrative tasks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信