Andrew S Franklin, Paul M Putnam, Meghana C Chanamolu, Chad A Nieri, M Boyd Gillespie
{"title":"通过投票评分确定气道阻塞的表型差异。","authors":"Andrew S Franklin, Paul M Putnam, Meghana C Chanamolu, Chad A Nieri, M Boyd Gillespie","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective if this study was to investigate phenotypic differences in airway obstruction, as determined by VOTE score, in a cohort of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients older than 18 years of age scheduled for DISE by one surgeon at a tertiary care center from July 2016 to July 2022 were included in a single-center retrospective cohort study. Patient demographics, body mass index (BMI), apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), and VOTE scores were extracted. Spearman correlation tests were utilized to determine the relationship between variables, and statistical analyses were performed using R.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 165 patients (61.24 years, SD 11.57; BMI 31.04 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, SD 6.05). Due to several significant relationships between VOTE scores and patient demographics, a cluster analysis was performed, in which two distinct clusters (phenotype 1 and phenotype 2) arose. Phenotype 1 patients had lower overall VOTE scores (<i>p</i> < 0.001), less obstruction at the velum (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and oropharynx (<i>p</i> < 0.001), significantly more tongue obstruction (<i>p</i> = 0.031), and a significantly lower BMI (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Though not reaching significance, phenotype 1 patients also had more epiglottic obstruction (<i>p</i> = 0.0841) and were older (<i>p</i> = 0.2775).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients suffering from OSA may be categorized into one of two distinct phenotypes of clinical significance. Phenotype 1 patients who are nonobese and have less significant obstruction overall, with increased obstruction at the tongue, may benefit greatly from targeted surgical modalities. Conversely, phenotype 2 patients with worse obstruction on DISE and increased velum and oropharynx obstruction may represent a phenotype of OSA that is increasingly difficult to treat surgically, due to body habitus and severe, multi-level obstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":"11 2","pages":"213-219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12172117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phenotypic differences in airway obstruction as determined by VOTE score.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew S Franklin, Paul M Putnam, Meghana C Chanamolu, Chad A Nieri, M Boyd Gillespie\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wjo2.202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective if this study was to investigate phenotypic differences in airway obstruction, as determined by VOTE score, in a cohort of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients older than 18 years of age scheduled for DISE by one surgeon at a tertiary care center from July 2016 to July 2022 were included in a single-center retrospective cohort study. Patient demographics, body mass index (BMI), apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), and VOTE scores were extracted. Spearman correlation tests were utilized to determine the relationship between variables, and statistical analyses were performed using R.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 165 patients (61.24 years, SD 11.57; BMI 31.04 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, SD 6.05). Due to several significant relationships between VOTE scores and patient demographics, a cluster analysis was performed, in which two distinct clusters (phenotype 1 and phenotype 2) arose. Phenotype 1 patients had lower overall VOTE scores (<i>p</i> < 0.001), less obstruction at the velum (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and oropharynx (<i>p</i> < 0.001), significantly more tongue obstruction (<i>p</i> = 0.031), and a significantly lower BMI (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Though not reaching significance, phenotype 1 patients also had more epiglottic obstruction (<i>p</i> = 0.0841) and were older (<i>p</i> = 0.2775).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients suffering from OSA may be categorized into one of two distinct phenotypes of clinical significance. Phenotype 1 patients who are nonobese and have less significant obstruction overall, with increased obstruction at the tongue, may benefit greatly from targeted surgical modalities. Conversely, phenotype 2 patients with worse obstruction on DISE and increased velum and oropharynx obstruction may represent a phenotype of OSA that is increasingly difficult to treat surgically, due to body habitus and severe, multi-level obstruction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"213-219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12172117/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究的目的是在一组接受药物性睡眠内窥镜检查(DISE)的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者中,通过投票评分来确定气道阻塞的表型差异。方法:将2016年7月至2022年7月在某三级保健中心由一名外科医生安排行DISE的年龄大于18岁的患者纳入单中心回顾性队列研究。提取患者人口统计资料、体重指数(BMI)、呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)和投票评分。采用Spearman相关检验确定变量间的关系,采用r进行统计学分析。结果:纳入165例患者(61.24岁,SD 11.57;BMI 31.04 kg/m2, SD 6.05)。由于投票得分与患者人口统计学之间存在一些重要关系,因此进行了聚类分析,其中出现了两个不同的聚类(表型1和表型2)。表型1患者的总体VOTE评分较低(p p p = 0.031), BMI显著较低(p = 0.001)。表型1型患者会厌梗阻发生率较高(p = 0.0841),年龄较大(p = 0.2775),但未达到统计学意义。结论:OSA患者可分为两种具有临床意义的不同表型之一。表型1型患者非肥胖,总体梗阻不明显,但舌部梗阻加重,可从靶向手术方式中获益。相反,由于身体习惯和严重的、多层次的阻塞,表型2患者在DISE上梗阻更严重,膜和口咽部梗阻增加,可能代表一种越来越难以手术治疗的OSA表型。
Phenotypic differences in airway obstruction as determined by VOTE score.
Objective: The objective if this study was to investigate phenotypic differences in airway obstruction, as determined by VOTE score, in a cohort of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE).
Methods: Patients older than 18 years of age scheduled for DISE by one surgeon at a tertiary care center from July 2016 to July 2022 were included in a single-center retrospective cohort study. Patient demographics, body mass index (BMI), apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), and VOTE scores were extracted. Spearman correlation tests were utilized to determine the relationship between variables, and statistical analyses were performed using R.
Results: The study included 165 patients (61.24 years, SD 11.57; BMI 31.04 kg/m2, SD 6.05). Due to several significant relationships between VOTE scores and patient demographics, a cluster analysis was performed, in which two distinct clusters (phenotype 1 and phenotype 2) arose. Phenotype 1 patients had lower overall VOTE scores (p < 0.001), less obstruction at the velum (p < 0.001) and oropharynx (p < 0.001), significantly more tongue obstruction (p = 0.031), and a significantly lower BMI (p = 0.001). Though not reaching significance, phenotype 1 patients also had more epiglottic obstruction (p = 0.0841) and were older (p = 0.2775).
Conclusions: Patients suffering from OSA may be categorized into one of two distinct phenotypes of clinical significance. Phenotype 1 patients who are nonobese and have less significant obstruction overall, with increased obstruction at the tongue, may benefit greatly from targeted surgical modalities. Conversely, phenotype 2 patients with worse obstruction on DISE and increased velum and oropharynx obstruction may represent a phenotype of OSA that is increasingly difficult to treat surgically, due to body habitus and severe, multi-level obstruction.