[喉内干预后发声障碍和良性喉病理患者的生物反馈治疗]。

Q3 Medicine
S G Romanenko, O G Pavlikhin, D I Kurbanova, E V Lesogorova, O V Eliseev, E A Safyannikova, E N Krasilnikova
{"title":"[喉内干预后发声障碍和良性喉病理患者的生物反馈治疗]。","authors":"S G Romanenko, O G Pavlikhin, D I Kurbanova, E V Lesogorova, O V Eliseev, E A Safyannikova, E N Krasilnikova","doi":"10.17116/otorino20259003130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To increase the effectiveness of voice restoration in patients with benign organic laryngeal pathology and functional dysphonia after endolaryngeal interventions.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>360 patients who underwent surgery for benign organic pathology of the vocal folds were examined. The examination was performed using videolaryngoscopy, videolaryngostroboscopy, computer acoustic analysis of the voice, and a subjective assessment of vocal function by a doctor on the N. Yanagihara scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 58 patients in the postoperative period, after the relief of inflammatory phenomena, the voice did not recover, due to the pathological type of phonation: nodular, hypotonic or hypertonic. Voice restoration measures were carried out: phonotherapy for patients of the 1st group, phonotherapy and biofeedback therapy sessions for patients of the 2nd group. According to subjective and objective assessments, biofeedback therapy significantly accelerated voice recovery in patients with hypertonic phonation. Biofeedback therapy had no significant effect on the restoration of vocal function in patients with nodular and hypotonic phonation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In cases where the voice does not fully recover after endolaryngeal interventions, additional therapeutic measures are required: phonotherapy and biofeedback therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23575,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik otorinolaringologii","volume":"90 3","pages":"30-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Biofeedback therapy in patients with dysphonia and benign laryngeal pathology after endolaryngeal interventions].\",\"authors\":\"S G Romanenko, O G Pavlikhin, D I Kurbanova, E V Lesogorova, O V Eliseev, E A Safyannikova, E N Krasilnikova\",\"doi\":\"10.17116/otorino20259003130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To increase the effectiveness of voice restoration in patients with benign organic laryngeal pathology and functional dysphonia after endolaryngeal interventions.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>360 patients who underwent surgery for benign organic pathology of the vocal folds were examined. The examination was performed using videolaryngoscopy, videolaryngostroboscopy, computer acoustic analysis of the voice, and a subjective assessment of vocal function by a doctor on the N. Yanagihara scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 58 patients in the postoperative period, after the relief of inflammatory phenomena, the voice did not recover, due to the pathological type of phonation: nodular, hypotonic or hypertonic. Voice restoration measures were carried out: phonotherapy for patients of the 1st group, phonotherapy and biofeedback therapy sessions for patients of the 2nd group. According to subjective and objective assessments, biofeedback therapy significantly accelerated voice recovery in patients with hypertonic phonation. Biofeedback therapy had no significant effect on the restoration of vocal function in patients with nodular and hypotonic phonation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In cases where the voice does not fully recover after endolaryngeal interventions, additional therapeutic measures are required: phonotherapy and biofeedback therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik otorinolaringologii\",\"volume\":\"90 3\",\"pages\":\"30-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik otorinolaringologii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino20259003130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik otorinolaringologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino20259003130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:提高良性器质性喉部病变合并功能性发声障碍患者经喉内干预后嗓音恢复的有效性。材料与方法:对360例声带良性器质性病变手术患者进行检查。检查采用视频喉镜检查、视频喉镜检查、声音的计算机声学分析,并由医生根据N. Yanagihara量表对声音功能进行主观评估。结果:术后58例患者,炎症现象缓解后,嗓音未恢复,原因为发声病理类型:结节状、低渗或高渗。进行语音恢复措施:第一组患者进行语音治疗,第二组患者进行语音治疗和生物反馈治疗。根据主观和客观评价,生物反馈疗法显著加速了高渗发声患者的语音恢复。生物反馈疗法对结节性和低张力发声患者的声带功能恢复无显著影响。结论:对于经咽内干预后声音不能完全恢复的病例,需要额外的治疗措施:语音治疗和生物反馈治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Biofeedback therapy in patients with dysphonia and benign laryngeal pathology after endolaryngeal interventions].

Objective: To increase the effectiveness of voice restoration in patients with benign organic laryngeal pathology and functional dysphonia after endolaryngeal interventions.

Material and methods: 360 patients who underwent surgery for benign organic pathology of the vocal folds were examined. The examination was performed using videolaryngoscopy, videolaryngostroboscopy, computer acoustic analysis of the voice, and a subjective assessment of vocal function by a doctor on the N. Yanagihara scale.

Results: In 58 patients in the postoperative period, after the relief of inflammatory phenomena, the voice did not recover, due to the pathological type of phonation: nodular, hypotonic or hypertonic. Voice restoration measures were carried out: phonotherapy for patients of the 1st group, phonotherapy and biofeedback therapy sessions for patients of the 2nd group. According to subjective and objective assessments, biofeedback therapy significantly accelerated voice recovery in patients with hypertonic phonation. Biofeedback therapy had no significant effect on the restoration of vocal function in patients with nodular and hypotonic phonation.

Conclusion: In cases where the voice does not fully recover after endolaryngeal interventions, additional therapeutic measures are required: phonotherapy and biofeedback therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vestnik otorinolaringologii
Vestnik otorinolaringologii Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信