Lu Meng, Hui Wang, Junto Otsuka, Yumi Okamoto, Shotaro Yokoyama, Shoma Oshima, Hanano Kato, Tze-Huan Lei, Tatsuro Amano
{"title":"经皮给药α1和α2肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂是否能调节高温运动中年轻女性的出汗?","authors":"Lu Meng, Hui Wang, Junto Otsuka, Yumi Okamoto, Shotaro Yokoyama, Shoma Oshima, Hanano Kato, Tze-Huan Lei, Tatsuro Amano","doi":"10.1159/000546961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adrenergic modulation of sweating remains equivocal in females. We investigated whether α1- and α2-adrenergic receptors can modulate sweating during active heat stress in healthy female participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty young adults (15 females) cycled at 50% peak oxygen uptake for 30 min at 32°C and 40% relative humidity. Sweat rates (ventilated capsule technique) on both forearms were assessed following pretreatment with terazosin (α1-adrenergic receptor antagonist), rauwolscine (α2 antagonist), or control (NaCl) using transdermal iontophoresis procedure. The efficacy of α1 blockade was confirmed postexercise with phenylephrine (α1-adrenergic agonist)-induced sweating, while α2 antagonist efficacy was verified in a separate follow-up study assessing clonidine (α2 agonist)-induced cutaneous vasoconstriction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants sweated by 0.32 ± 0.13 and 0.54 ± 0.26 mg∙cm-2∙min-1 at the end of exercise for females and males, respectively. Neither terazosin nor rauwolscine affected sweating during exercise in males (p ≥ 0.125, interaction and treatment effect) or females (p ≥ 0.277) as compared to control sites. However, the reduction in sweat rate at the terazosin-treated site was negatively correlated with sweat rate at control sites in both sexes (all p ≤ 0.050, r ≤ -0.514), while no such correlation was observed for rauwolscine. Successful α1-blockade was confirmed by attenuated phenylephrine-induced sweating during postexercise (p ≤ 0.025). Rauwolscine effectively abolished clonidine-induced cutaneous vasoconstriction in a follow-up study, verifying successful transdermal delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The α1- and α2-adrenergic receptors do not alter sweating during moderate-intensity exercise in males and females, at least among individuals with relatively low sweat production.</p>","PeriodicalId":21748,"journal":{"name":"Skin Pharmacology and Physiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Transdermal Administration of α1- and α2-Adrenergic Receptor Antagonists Modulate Sweating in Exercising Young Females in the Heat?\",\"authors\":\"Lu Meng, Hui Wang, Junto Otsuka, Yumi Okamoto, Shotaro Yokoyama, Shoma Oshima, Hanano Kato, Tze-Huan Lei, Tatsuro Amano\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000546961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adrenergic modulation of sweating remains equivocal in females. We investigated whether α1- and α2-adrenergic receptors can modulate sweating during active heat stress in healthy female participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty young adults (15 females) cycled at 50% peak oxygen uptake for 30 min at 32°C and 40% relative humidity. Sweat rates (ventilated capsule technique) on both forearms were assessed following pretreatment with terazosin (α1-adrenergic receptor antagonist), rauwolscine (α2 antagonist), or control (NaCl) using transdermal iontophoresis procedure. The efficacy of α1 blockade was confirmed postexercise with phenylephrine (α1-adrenergic agonist)-induced sweating, while α2 antagonist efficacy was verified in a separate follow-up study assessing clonidine (α2 agonist)-induced cutaneous vasoconstriction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants sweated by 0.32 ± 0.13 and 0.54 ± 0.26 mg∙cm-2∙min-1 at the end of exercise for females and males, respectively. Neither terazosin nor rauwolscine affected sweating during exercise in males (p ≥ 0.125, interaction and treatment effect) or females (p ≥ 0.277) as compared to control sites. However, the reduction in sweat rate at the terazosin-treated site was negatively correlated with sweat rate at control sites in both sexes (all p ≤ 0.050, r ≤ -0.514), while no such correlation was observed for rauwolscine. Successful α1-blockade was confirmed by attenuated phenylephrine-induced sweating during postexercise (p ≤ 0.025). Rauwolscine effectively abolished clonidine-induced cutaneous vasoconstriction in a follow-up study, verifying successful transdermal delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The α1- and α2-adrenergic receptors do not alter sweating during moderate-intensity exercise in males and females, at least among individuals with relatively low sweat production.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Skin Pharmacology and Physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Skin Pharmacology and Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546961\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin Pharmacology and Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546961","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Do Transdermal Administration of α1- and α2-Adrenergic Receptor Antagonists Modulate Sweating in Exercising Young Females in the Heat?
Introduction: Adrenergic modulation of sweating remains equivocal in females. We investigated whether α1- and α2-adrenergic receptors can modulate sweating during active heat stress in healthy female participants.
Methods: Thirty young adults (15 females) cycled at 50% peak oxygen uptake for 30 min at 32°C and 40% relative humidity. Sweat rates (ventilated capsule technique) on both forearms were assessed following pretreatment with terazosin (α1-adrenergic receptor antagonist), rauwolscine (α2 antagonist), or control (NaCl) using transdermal iontophoresis procedure. The efficacy of α1 blockade was confirmed postexercise with phenylephrine (α1-adrenergic agonist)-induced sweating, while α2 antagonist efficacy was verified in a separate follow-up study assessing clonidine (α2 agonist)-induced cutaneous vasoconstriction.
Results: Participants sweated by 0.32 ± 0.13 and 0.54 ± 0.26 mg∙cm-2∙min-1 at the end of exercise for females and males, respectively. Neither terazosin nor rauwolscine affected sweating during exercise in males (p ≥ 0.125, interaction and treatment effect) or females (p ≥ 0.277) as compared to control sites. However, the reduction in sweat rate at the terazosin-treated site was negatively correlated with sweat rate at control sites in both sexes (all p ≤ 0.050, r ≤ -0.514), while no such correlation was observed for rauwolscine. Successful α1-blockade was confirmed by attenuated phenylephrine-induced sweating during postexercise (p ≤ 0.025). Rauwolscine effectively abolished clonidine-induced cutaneous vasoconstriction in a follow-up study, verifying successful transdermal delivery.
Conclusion: The α1- and α2-adrenergic receptors do not alter sweating during moderate-intensity exercise in males and females, at least among individuals with relatively low sweat production.
期刊介绍:
In the past decade research into skin pharmacology has rapidly developed with new and promising drugs and therapeutic concepts being introduced regularly. Recently, the use of nanoparticles for drug delivery in dermatology and cosmetology has become a topic of intensive research, yielding remarkable and in part surprising results. Another topic of current research is the use of tissue tolerable plasma in wound treatment. Stimulating not only wound healing processes but also the penetration of topically applied substances into the skin, this novel technique is expected to deliver very interesting results.