分形分析评价植骨和无植骨上颌窦提升术再生骨。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ayşe Gül Öner Talmaç, Alaettin Koç, Ahmet Cemil Talmaç, Levent Ciğerim, Metin Çalışır, Emre Gürkan Eroğlu
{"title":"分形分析评价植骨和无植骨上颌窦提升术再生骨。","authors":"Ayşe Gül Öner Talmaç, Alaettin Koç, Ahmet Cemil Talmaç, Levent Ciğerim, Metin Çalışır, Emre Gürkan Eroğlu","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b6309977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to quantitatively calculate and compare the changes in regenerated bone around the implant in graftless and grafted sinus elevation procedures using fractal dimension analysis, and to provide an additional criterion for clinical preference.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>The study included 65 patients (29 graftless and 36 grafted) at the Faculty of Dentistry in Van Yüzüncü Yıl University. Graftless and grafted sinus elevation techniques were compared in terms of fractal dimension and bone density on panoramic radiographs. The Student t test was used to compare the mean values of fractal dimension and bone density in patients with graftless and grafted sinus elevation. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation of fractal dimension and bone density data with age. Statistical significance was accepted at P .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The fractal dimension and bone density were not statistically significant between the two groups (P > .05). The fractal dimension and bone density parameters were higher in men for both sinus elevation techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results showed that the graftless and grafted sinus elevation techniques had similar fractal dimension and bone density outcomes. Therefore, it was concluded that the graftless technique is preferable for maxillary sinus elevation because of its relatively simple technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":"0 0","pages":"574-580"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fractal analysis evaluation of regenerated bone in grafted and graftless maxillary sinus elevation procedures.\",\"authors\":\"Ayşe Gül Öner Talmaç, Alaettin Koç, Ahmet Cemil Talmaç, Levent Ciğerim, Metin Çalışır, Emre Gürkan Eroğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.qi.b6309977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to quantitatively calculate and compare the changes in regenerated bone around the implant in graftless and grafted sinus elevation procedures using fractal dimension analysis, and to provide an additional criterion for clinical preference.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>The study included 65 patients (29 graftless and 36 grafted) at the Faculty of Dentistry in Van Yüzüncü Yıl University. Graftless and grafted sinus elevation techniques were compared in terms of fractal dimension and bone density on panoramic radiographs. The Student t test was used to compare the mean values of fractal dimension and bone density in patients with graftless and grafted sinus elevation. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation of fractal dimension and bone density data with age. Statistical significance was accepted at P .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The fractal dimension and bone density were not statistically significant between the two groups (P > .05). The fractal dimension and bone density parameters were higher in men for both sinus elevation techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results showed that the graftless and grafted sinus elevation techniques had similar fractal dimension and bone density outcomes. Therefore, it was concluded that the graftless technique is preferable for maxillary sinus elevation because of its relatively simple technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quintessence international\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"574-580\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quintessence international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b6309977\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b6309977","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利用分形维数(FD)分析定量计算和比较无瓣和有瓣鼻窦提升术中种植体周围再生骨的变化,为临床选择提供附加标准。方法和材料:本研究纳入了牙科学院的65例患者(29例未移植,36例移植)。比较无骨和有骨鼻窦提升技术在全景x线片上的FD和骨密度(BD)。采用学生t检验比较无移植物和移植物窦抬高患者FD和BD的平均值。采用Pearson相关系数分析FD和BD数据与年龄的相关性。差异有统计学意义,p < 0.05。结果:两组FD、BD差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。两种鼻窦提升技术的男性FD和BD参数均较高。结论:本研究表明,无移植物和移植物窦提升技术具有相似的FD和BD结果。因此,我们认为无移植物技术是上颌窦提升术的首选技术,因为它的技术相对简单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fractal analysis evaluation of regenerated bone in grafted and graftless maxillary sinus elevation procedures.

Objective: The aim of this study was to quantitatively calculate and compare the changes in regenerated bone around the implant in graftless and grafted sinus elevation procedures using fractal dimension analysis, and to provide an additional criterion for clinical preference.

Method and materials: The study included 65 patients (29 graftless and 36 grafted) at the Faculty of Dentistry in Van Yüzüncü Yıl University. Graftless and grafted sinus elevation techniques were compared in terms of fractal dimension and bone density on panoramic radiographs. The Student t test was used to compare the mean values of fractal dimension and bone density in patients with graftless and grafted sinus elevation. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation of fractal dimension and bone density data with age. Statistical significance was accepted at P .05.

Results: The fractal dimension and bone density were not statistically significant between the two groups (P > .05). The fractal dimension and bone density parameters were higher in men for both sinus elevation techniques.

Conclusions: The results showed that the graftless and grafted sinus elevation techniques had similar fractal dimension and bone density outcomes. Therefore, it was concluded that the graftless technique is preferable for maxillary sinus elevation because of its relatively simple technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quintessence international
Quintessence international 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信