妊娠至产后纵向PSQI与活动描记睡眠的比较。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-06-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0323489
Ryan L Brown, Chloe M Beverly Hery, Aric A Prather, Lisa M Christian
{"title":"妊娠至产后纵向PSQI与活动描记睡眠的比较。","authors":"Ryan L Brown, Chloe M Beverly Hery, Aric A Prather, Lisa M Christian","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0323489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the importance of sleep for perinatal health, there is limited research examining whether different measurement modalities may yield inconsistent data from pregnancy through postpartum. We aimed to: 1) describe how sleep patterns change across pregnancy and postpartum using self-report PSQI and actigraphy measures and 2) determine the level of correspondence between these two measurement modalities. Pregnant women from the Stress and Health in Pregnancy and Postpartum (SHIPP) study completed visits during the 3rd trimester, 4-6 weeks postpartum, and 4 months, 8 months, and 12 months postpartum. At each study visit, participants completed questionnaires and wore wrist-actigraphy (Actiwatch 2) for one week prior to each visit. Self-reported global sleep quality was measured with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Actigraphy and self-reported PSQI sleep characteristics were summarized at each of the five study visits. Using generalized linear mixed modeling, we examined if there were differences by sleep measurement (actigraphy vs. PSQI) for the overlapping sleep outcomes: total sleep time, time in bed, sleep latency, and sleep efficiency. Participants (n = 74; 28.9 years ± 4.6) were mostly white (73%), non-Hispanic (96%), married (78.5%) and over 60% had at least one child previously. Average PSQI global score was > 5 (cutoff for poor sleep) at each study visit. Total sleep time, sleep efficiency, and sleep latency measurements were significantly different between self-report and actigraphy throughout pregnancy and postpartum. Actigraphy-assessed sleep may reflect longer total sleep times, shorter sleep latency, and greater sleep efficiency compared to self-reported sleep among pregnant and postpartum women. This may be due to measurement error in actigraphy or recall bias when completing self-reported sleep measures. These factors should be taken into consideration both at the time of study design and when comparing results from different studies to facilitate the highest quality research and clinical decision-making in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 6","pages":"e0323489"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12176231/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of longitudinal PSQI and actigraphy-assessed sleep from pregnancy to postpartum.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan L Brown, Chloe M Beverly Hery, Aric A Prather, Lisa M Christian\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0323489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite the importance of sleep for perinatal health, there is limited research examining whether different measurement modalities may yield inconsistent data from pregnancy through postpartum. We aimed to: 1) describe how sleep patterns change across pregnancy and postpartum using self-report PSQI and actigraphy measures and 2) determine the level of correspondence between these two measurement modalities. Pregnant women from the Stress and Health in Pregnancy and Postpartum (SHIPP) study completed visits during the 3rd trimester, 4-6 weeks postpartum, and 4 months, 8 months, and 12 months postpartum. At each study visit, participants completed questionnaires and wore wrist-actigraphy (Actiwatch 2) for one week prior to each visit. Self-reported global sleep quality was measured with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Actigraphy and self-reported PSQI sleep characteristics were summarized at each of the five study visits. Using generalized linear mixed modeling, we examined if there were differences by sleep measurement (actigraphy vs. PSQI) for the overlapping sleep outcomes: total sleep time, time in bed, sleep latency, and sleep efficiency. Participants (n = 74; 28.9 years ± 4.6) were mostly white (73%), non-Hispanic (96%), married (78.5%) and over 60% had at least one child previously. Average PSQI global score was > 5 (cutoff for poor sleep) at each study visit. Total sleep time, sleep efficiency, and sleep latency measurements were significantly different between self-report and actigraphy throughout pregnancy and postpartum. Actigraphy-assessed sleep may reflect longer total sleep times, shorter sleep latency, and greater sleep efficiency compared to self-reported sleep among pregnant and postpartum women. This may be due to measurement error in actigraphy or recall bias when completing self-reported sleep measures. These factors should be taken into consideration both at the time of study design and when comparing results from different studies to facilitate the highest quality research and clinical decision-making in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 6\",\"pages\":\"e0323489\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12176231/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323489\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323489","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管睡眠对围产期健康很重要,但关于从怀孕到产后不同测量方式是否会产生不一致数据的研究有限。我们的目的是:1)使用自我报告的PSQI和活动描记测量来描述睡眠模式在怀孕和产后的变化;2)确定这两种测量方式之间的对应程度。来自妊娠和产后压力与健康(SHIPP)研究的孕妇在妊娠第3个月、产后4-6周、产后4个月、8个月和12个月完成了访问。在每次研究访问中,参与者完成问卷调查,并在每次访问前一周佩戴手腕活动记录仪(Actiwatch 2)。自我报告的全球睡眠质量用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)来衡量。在五次研究访问中,每次都总结了活动记录仪和自我报告的PSQI睡眠特征。使用广义线性混合模型,我们通过睡眠测量(活动描记与PSQI)检查重叠睡眠结果(总睡眠时间、卧床时间、睡眠潜伏期和睡眠效率)是否存在差异。参与者(n = 74;28.9岁±4.6岁),主要为白人(73%),非西班牙裔(96%),已婚(78.5%),60%以上以前至少有一个孩子。在每次研究访问时,PSQI总体平均得分为bb50(睡眠质量差的截止值)。总睡眠时间、睡眠效率和睡眠潜伏期测量在怀孕期间和产后的自我报告和活动记录仪之间存在显著差异。与孕妇和产后妇女自我报告的睡眠相比,活动记录仪评估的睡眠可能反映出更长的总睡眠时间,更短的睡眠潜伏期和更高的睡眠效率。这可能是由于在完成自我报告睡眠测量时,活动记录仪的测量误差或回忆偏差造成的。在设计研究和比较不同研究的结果时,应考虑这些因素,以便在该人群中进行最高质量的研究和临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of longitudinal PSQI and actigraphy-assessed sleep from pregnancy to postpartum.

Comparison of longitudinal PSQI and actigraphy-assessed sleep from pregnancy to postpartum.

Comparison of longitudinal PSQI and actigraphy-assessed sleep from pregnancy to postpartum.

Comparison of longitudinal PSQI and actigraphy-assessed sleep from pregnancy to postpartum.

Despite the importance of sleep for perinatal health, there is limited research examining whether different measurement modalities may yield inconsistent data from pregnancy through postpartum. We aimed to: 1) describe how sleep patterns change across pregnancy and postpartum using self-report PSQI and actigraphy measures and 2) determine the level of correspondence between these two measurement modalities. Pregnant women from the Stress and Health in Pregnancy and Postpartum (SHIPP) study completed visits during the 3rd trimester, 4-6 weeks postpartum, and 4 months, 8 months, and 12 months postpartum. At each study visit, participants completed questionnaires and wore wrist-actigraphy (Actiwatch 2) for one week prior to each visit. Self-reported global sleep quality was measured with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Actigraphy and self-reported PSQI sleep characteristics were summarized at each of the five study visits. Using generalized linear mixed modeling, we examined if there were differences by sleep measurement (actigraphy vs. PSQI) for the overlapping sleep outcomes: total sleep time, time in bed, sleep latency, and sleep efficiency. Participants (n = 74; 28.9 years ± 4.6) were mostly white (73%), non-Hispanic (96%), married (78.5%) and over 60% had at least one child previously. Average PSQI global score was > 5 (cutoff for poor sleep) at each study visit. Total sleep time, sleep efficiency, and sleep latency measurements were significantly different between self-report and actigraphy throughout pregnancy and postpartum. Actigraphy-assessed sleep may reflect longer total sleep times, shorter sleep latency, and greater sleep efficiency compared to self-reported sleep among pregnant and postpartum women. This may be due to measurement error in actigraphy or recall bias when completing self-reported sleep measures. These factors should be taken into consideration both at the time of study design and when comparing results from different studies to facilitate the highest quality research and clinical decision-making in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信