波兰内科患者血液感染的经验性和靶向抗生素治疗:使用AWaRe分类在单一中心进行的三年分析。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Piotr Piekiełko, Dariusz A Hareza, Ewa Stawowczyk, Estera Jachowicz-Matczak, Jadwiga Wójkowska-Mach
{"title":"波兰内科患者血液感染的经验性和靶向抗生素治疗:使用AWaRe分类在单一中心进行的三年分析。","authors":"Piotr Piekiełko, Dariusz A Hareza, Ewa Stawowczyk, Estera Jachowicz-Matczak, Jadwiga Wójkowska-Mach","doi":"10.1007/s43440-025-00753-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bloodstream infection (BSI), defined as bacteraemia accompanied by sepsis or septic shock, is a frequent cause of hospitalization in departments of internal medicine (DIM). This study aimed to characterize the epidemiology, microbiological profile, and antibiotic treatment patterns of BSIs in a DIM setting in 2021-2023 in Polish hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-year, single-centre retrospective analysis was conducted at a DIM in Southern Poland. Medical records from 2021 to 2023 were reviewed for patients diagnosed with sepsis (ICD-10 codes A40-A41) with microbiological confirmation. Antibiotic use was assessed using Days of Therapy (DOT) and Length of Therapy (LOT). Empiric and targeted therapies were classified according to the WHO AWaRe (Access, Watch, Reserve) framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 124 BSI cases were identified, with an incidence rate of 5.8%. Community-acquired BSIs accounted for 84.3% of cases, while 15.7% were hospital-acquired. The predominant pathogens were Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. The median LOT for empiric therapy was 3 days (IQR 2-4), with third-generation cephalosporins being the most frequently used agents (78 patients; 43.3%, 228 DOTs; 43.9%). Targeted therapy had a median LOT of 8 days (IQR 5-10), most commonly involving penicillins (33 patients; 28.4%, 291 DOTs; 34.5%). Access group antibiotics were significantly more prevalent in targeted therapy compared to empiric therapy (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Microbiological confirmation of BSI facilitates a safe de-escalation from broad-spectrum empiric antibiotics to narrow-spectrum targeted therapy, supporting antimicrobial stewardship in internal medicine settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19947,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empiric and targeted antibiotic therapy for bloodstream infections in internal medicine patients in Poland: a three-year analysis in a single centre using the AWaRe classification.\",\"authors\":\"Piotr Piekiełko, Dariusz A Hareza, Ewa Stawowczyk, Estera Jachowicz-Matczak, Jadwiga Wójkowska-Mach\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43440-025-00753-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bloodstream infection (BSI), defined as bacteraemia accompanied by sepsis or septic shock, is a frequent cause of hospitalization in departments of internal medicine (DIM). This study aimed to characterize the epidemiology, microbiological profile, and antibiotic treatment patterns of BSIs in a DIM setting in 2021-2023 in Polish hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-year, single-centre retrospective analysis was conducted at a DIM in Southern Poland. Medical records from 2021 to 2023 were reviewed for patients diagnosed with sepsis (ICD-10 codes A40-A41) with microbiological confirmation. Antibiotic use was assessed using Days of Therapy (DOT) and Length of Therapy (LOT). Empiric and targeted therapies were classified according to the WHO AWaRe (Access, Watch, Reserve) framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 124 BSI cases were identified, with an incidence rate of 5.8%. Community-acquired BSIs accounted for 84.3% of cases, while 15.7% were hospital-acquired. The predominant pathogens were Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. The median LOT for empiric therapy was 3 days (IQR 2-4), with third-generation cephalosporins being the most frequently used agents (78 patients; 43.3%, 228 DOTs; 43.9%). Targeted therapy had a median LOT of 8 days (IQR 5-10), most commonly involving penicillins (33 patients; 28.4%, 291 DOTs; 34.5%). Access group antibiotics were significantly more prevalent in targeted therapy compared to empiric therapy (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Microbiological confirmation of BSI facilitates a safe de-escalation from broad-spectrum empiric antibiotics to narrow-spectrum targeted therapy, supporting antimicrobial stewardship in internal medicine settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacological Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacological Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43440-025-00753-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43440-025-00753-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血流感染(BSI)被定义为伴随脓毒症或脓毒性休克的菌血症,是内科住院(DIM)的常见原因。本研究旨在描述2021-2023年波兰医院DIM环境中bsi的流行病学、微生物学特征和抗生素治疗模式。方法:在波兰南部的一家DIM进行了为期三年的单中心回顾性分析。回顾了2021年至2023年诊断为败血症(ICD-10代码A40-A41)并经微生物学证实的患者的医疗记录。使用治疗天数(DOT)和治疗时间(LOT)评估抗生素使用情况。根据世卫组织AWaRe(获取、观察、储备)框架对经验性治疗和靶向治疗进行分类。结果:共发现BSI病例124例,发病率5.8%。社区获得性脑损伤占84.3%,15.7%为医院获得性脑损伤。主要病原菌为大肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌。经验性治疗的中位LOT为3天(IQR 2-4),第三代头孢菌素是最常用的药物(78例;43.3%, 228个DOTs;43.9%)。靶向治疗的LOT中位数为8天(IQR 5-10),最常见的是青霉素类药物(33例;29.4%, 291个DOTs;34.5%)。与经验性治疗相比,可及组抗生素在靶向治疗中明显更普遍(p结论:BSI的微生物学确认有助于从广谱经验性抗生素安全降格到窄谱靶向治疗,支持内科环境中的抗菌药物管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empiric and targeted antibiotic therapy for bloodstream infections in internal medicine patients in Poland: a three-year analysis in a single centre using the AWaRe classification.

Background: Bloodstream infection (BSI), defined as bacteraemia accompanied by sepsis or septic shock, is a frequent cause of hospitalization in departments of internal medicine (DIM). This study aimed to characterize the epidemiology, microbiological profile, and antibiotic treatment patterns of BSIs in a DIM setting in 2021-2023 in Polish hospital.

Methods: A three-year, single-centre retrospective analysis was conducted at a DIM in Southern Poland. Medical records from 2021 to 2023 were reviewed for patients diagnosed with sepsis (ICD-10 codes A40-A41) with microbiological confirmation. Antibiotic use was assessed using Days of Therapy (DOT) and Length of Therapy (LOT). Empiric and targeted therapies were classified according to the WHO AWaRe (Access, Watch, Reserve) framework.

Results: A total of 124 BSI cases were identified, with an incidence rate of 5.8%. Community-acquired BSIs accounted for 84.3% of cases, while 15.7% were hospital-acquired. The predominant pathogens were Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. The median LOT for empiric therapy was 3 days (IQR 2-4), with third-generation cephalosporins being the most frequently used agents (78 patients; 43.3%, 228 DOTs; 43.9%). Targeted therapy had a median LOT of 8 days (IQR 5-10), most commonly involving penicillins (33 patients; 28.4%, 291 DOTs; 34.5%). Access group antibiotics were significantly more prevalent in targeted therapy compared to empiric therapy (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Microbiological confirmation of BSI facilitates a safe de-escalation from broad-spectrum empiric antibiotics to narrow-spectrum targeted therapy, supporting antimicrobial stewardship in internal medicine settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacological Reports
Pharmacological Reports 医学-药学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Pharmacological Reports publishes articles concerning all aspects of pharmacology, dealing with the action of drugs at a cellular and molecular level, and papers on the relationship between molecular structure and biological activity as well as reports on compounds with well-defined chemical structures. Pharmacological Reports is an open forum to disseminate recent developments in: pharmacology, behavioural brain research, evidence-based complementary biochemical pharmacology, medicinal chemistry and biochemistry, drug discovery, neuro-psychopharmacology and biological psychiatry, neuroscience and neuropharmacology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, molecular biology, cell biology, toxicology. Studies of plant extracts are not suitable for Pharmacological Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信